Literature DB >> 30244174

Alarming decline in recognition of anatomical structures amongst medical students and physicians.

Mateusz K Hołda1, Tomasz Stefura2, Mateusz Koziej3, Oksana Skomarovska2, Katarzyna A Jasińska2, Wojciech Sałabun4, Wiesława Klimek-Piotrowska3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insufficient anatomical training can put patients' safety at risk. The aim of this study was to assess the proficiency of medical students and physicians in identifying labeled anatomical structures. The second aim of the study was to evaluate factors that can affect this recognition.
METHODS: An internet-based survey where participants had to correctly identify labeled anatomical structures on cadaveric specimens was designed.
RESULTS: The study group included 1186 participants (58.7% females): 931 medical students and 255 medical graduates from all twelve Polish medical schools. The mean total survey score for the entire study group was 65.6%. Students gained significantly higher results than graduates (total: 67.3% vs. 59.5%, P<0.001); 331 (27.9%) participants did not pass the test (<60). There was a correlation observed between points gained in this survey and grade obtained in the gross anatomy course (P<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression found that participation in cadaver laboratory classes most strongly increases anatomical competencies (OR=5.30, 95%CI=1.20-23.40, P=0.03). Other significant factors boosting anatomical proficiency were membership in students' scientific clubs, being male, and having a high grade (≥80%) in initial gross anatomy course. The time since anatomy course completion was negatively correlated with the total survey score (OR=0.86, 95%CI=0.81-0.92, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical knowledge of Polish medical students is moderate (<70%) and it significantly decreases with time. Anatomical structure recognition can be up to 25% lower in highly trained physicians when compared to pre-clinical medical students. This trend may be reversed by replacing subject-based anatomy courses with system-based (integrated) curricula at the undergraduate level or introducing short refresher anatomical courses during postgraduate training.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cadaver dissection; Clinical anatomy; Gross anatomy education; Medical education; Surgical anatomy; Undergraduate education

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30244174     DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2018.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Anat        ISSN: 0940-9602            Impact factor:   2.698


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review.

Authors:  Dorothea Maria Koppes; Charlotte Petronella Robertus Triepels; Kim Josephina Bernadette Notten; Carlijn Franscisca Anna Smeets; Rutgerus Franciscus Petrus Maria Kruitwagen; Toon Van Gorp; Fedde Scheele; Sander Martijn Job Van Kuijk
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 2.  What is the real cardiac anatomy?

Authors:  Shumpei Mori; Justin T Tretter; Diane E Spicer; David L Bolender; Robert H Anderson
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 3.  Addressing the failures of undergraduate anatomy education: Dissecting the issue and innovating a solution.

Authors:  Karam Ahmad; Tahir Khaleeq; Umar Hanif; Nadia Ahmad
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-12-25

4.  Rethinking gross anatomy in a compressed time frame: Clinical symptoms, not case studies, as the basis for introductory instruction.

Authors:  Sasha N Zill
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.414

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.