Mazyar Ghanaat1, Andrew G Winer2, Daniel D Sjoberg3, Bing Ying Poon3, Mahyar Kashan4, Amy L Tin3, John P Sfakianos5, Eugene K Cha6, Timothy F Donahue6, Guido Dalbagni6, Harry W Herr6, Bernard H Bochner6, Andrew J Vickers3, S Machele Donat6. 1. Urology Service at the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: ghanaatm@mskcc.org. 2. SUNY Downstate College of Medicine and Kings County Hospital Center, New York, NY. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 4. Urology Service at the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; SUNY Downstate College of Medicine and Kings County Hospital Center, New York, NY. 5. Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. 6. Urology Service at the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact on recovery of bowel function using an 80 mm versus 60 mm gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) stapler following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (RC/UD) for bladder cancer. METHODS: We identified 696 patients using a prospectively maintained RC/UD database from January 2006 to November 2010. Two nonrandomized consecutive cohorts were compared. Patients between January 2006- and December 2007 (n = 180) were treated using a 60 mm GIA stapler, and 331 patients between January 2008 and December 2010 were subject to an 80 mm GIA stapler. All patients were treated on the same standardized postoperative recovery pathway. After accounting for baseline patient and perioperative characteristics, using a multivariable logistic regression model, we directly compared rates of postoperative ileus using a standardized definition. RESULTS: Of 511 evaluable patients, ileus was observed in 32% (57/180) for 60 mm GIA versus 33% (110/331) for the 80 mm GIA. Preoperative renal function, age, gender, body mass index, and type of diversion were comparable between cohorts. On multivariate analysis, stapler size was not significantly associated with the development of ileus (GIA-60 vs GIA-80: OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.75, 1.66; P = .6). Positive fluid balance was associated with an increased risk (P = .019) and female sex a decreased risk (P = .008) of developing ileus compared to patients with negative fluid balance. CONCLUSION: The size of the intestinal bowel anastomosis (GIA 80 mm vs 60 mm) does not independently impact the time to bowel recovery following RC/UD.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact on recovery of bowel function using an 80 mm versus 60 mm gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) stapler following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (RC/UD) for bladder cancer. METHODS: We identified 696 patients using a prospectively maintained RC/UD database from January 2006 to November 2010. Two nonrandomized consecutive cohorts were compared. Patients between January 2006- and December 2007 (n = 180) were treated using a 60 mm GIA stapler, and 331 patients between January 2008 and December 2010 were subject to an 80 mm GIA stapler. All patients were treated on the same standardized postoperative recovery pathway. After accounting for baseline patient and perioperative characteristics, using a multivariable logistic regression model, we directly compared rates of postoperative ileus using a standardized definition. RESULTS: Of 511 evaluable patients, ileus was observed in 32% (57/180) for 60 mm GIA versus 33% (110/331) for the 80 mm GIA. Preoperative renal function, age, gender, body mass index, and type of diversion were comparable between cohorts. On multivariate analysis, stapler size was not significantly associated with the development of ileus (GIA-60 vs GIA-80: OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.75, 1.66; P = .6). Positive fluid balance was associated with an increased risk (P = .019) and female sex a decreased risk (P = .008) of developing ileus compared to patients with negative fluid balance. CONCLUSION: The size of the intestinal bowel anastomosis (GIA 80 mm vs 60 mm) does not independently impact the time to bowel recovery following RC/UD.