Literature DB >> 30243663

Solubility and pH Value of 3 Different Root Canal Sealers: A Long-term Investigation.

Kent Urban1, Julian Neuhaus1, David Donnermeyer1, Edgar Schäfer2, Till Dammaschke3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the solubility and the change in pH of a tricalcium silicate-containing sealer (BioRoot RCS [BR]), a mineral trioxide aggregate-containing sealer (MTA Fillapex [MTA]), and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus [AH]) during a longer period of time. <br> METHODS: The solubility test was carried out in accordance with ISO6876:2012. Three hundred eighty sealer samples (n = 10 per group) were stored for 6 months in double distilled water (AD) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The solubility was determined on the basis of the mass difference in percent. The pH measurement was carried out on the basis of the experimental setup of the solubility test with the aid of an electrode pH meter. The results were evaluated for significance by using analysis of variance, Student-Newman-Keuls, and t test (P < .05). <br> RESULTS: The highest solubility was found for MTA in AD (4.65% ± 1.17%), followed by BR in AD (3.88% ± 0.42%) (P < .05). Also in PBS, MTA (3.24% ± 0.7%) showed a higher solubility than BR (1.78% ± 0.5%) (P < .05). AH was virtually insoluble during the entire period (0.5% ± 0.5%) (P < .05). The pH decreased continuously over time for all samples. After 6 months, BR showed the highest pH in AD (pH 10.3), followed by MTA in AD (pH 8.8), BR in PBS (pH 7.5), AH in PBS (pH 7.3), MTA in PBS (pH 7.2), and AH in AD (pH 6.3). <br> CONCLUSIONS: The solubility of MTA was significantly increased compared with BR and AH. Storage in PBS significantly reduced solubility of MTA and BR. BR showed a higher pH in both AD and PBS than MTA in AD and PBS. AH did not cause any significant pH change.
Copyright © 2018 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AH Plus; BioRoot RCS; MTA Fillapex; long-term solubility; pH value

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30243663     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  10 in total

1.  Esterases affect the physical properties of materials used to seal the endodontic space.

Authors:  M Q Marashdeh; S Friedman; C Lévesque; Y Finer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Influence of acidic pH on antimicrobial activity of different calcium silicate based-endodontic sealers.

Authors:  Fatima Bosaid; Hacer Aksel; Adham A Azim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use.

Authors:  Josette Camilleri; Amre Atmeh; Xin Li; Nastaran Meschi
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Flow characteristics and alkalinity of novel bioceramic root canal sealers.

Authors:  Anastasios Katakidis; Konstantinos Sidiropoulos; Elisabeth Koulaouzidou; Christos Gogos; Nikolaos Economides
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2020-08-18

5.  Medium- and Long-Term Re-Treatment of Root Canals Filled with a Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer: An Experimental Ex Vivo Study.

Authors:  Giulia Bardini; Elisabetta Cotti; Terenzio Congiu; Claudia Caria; Davide Aru; Montse Mercadè
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.748

6.  Impact of Immersion Media on Physical Properties and Bioactivity of Epoxy Resin-Based and Bioceramic Endodontic Sealers.

Authors:  Thais Gomes de Moraes; Alan Silva de Menezes; Renata Grazziotin-Soares; Rafael Ubaldo Moreira E Moraes; Paulo Vitor Campos Ferreira; Ceci Nunes Carvalho; Jose Bauer; Edilausson Moreno Carvalho
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.329

7.  In vitro physicochemical characterization of five root canal sealers and their influence on an ex vivo oral multi-species biofilm community.

Authors:  Flavia M Saavedra; Lauter E Pelepenko; William S Boyle; Anqi Zhang; Christopher Staley; Mark C Herzberg; Marina A Marciano; Bruno P Lima
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  A comprehensive in vitro comparison of the biological and physicochemical properties of bioactive root canal sealers.

Authors:  Sabina Noreen Wuersching; Christian Diegritz; Reinhard Hickel; Karin Christine Huth; Maximilian Kollmuss
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.606

9.  Duration of Immersion and Type of Immersion Solution Distort the Outcome of Push-Out Bond Strength Testing Protocols.

Authors:  David Donnermeyer; Lena Göbell; Sebastian Bürklein; Till Dammaschke; Edgar Schäfer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Interfacial Biomaterial-Dentin Bacterial Biofilm Proliferation and Viability Is Affected by the Material, Aging Media and Period.

Authors:  Muna Q Marashdeh; Celine Lévesque; Shimon Friedman; Cameron A Stewart; Yoav Finer
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.