PURPOSE: Tumor trailing is a treatment delivery technique that continuously adjusts the beam aperture according to the last available time-averaged position of the target. This study investigates whether tumor trailing on a magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerator (linac) can improve target coverage in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the case of baseline motion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 17 patients with oligometastatic liver disease, midposition SBRT treatment plans (3 × 20 Gy, 11-beam intensity modulated radiotherapy) were created for the Elekta Unity MR-Linac. Treatment was simulated using an in-house-developed delivery emulator. Respiratory motion was modelled as the superposition of periodic motion (patient-specific amplitude, 4-second period) and the following baseline motion scenarios: a continuous linear drift (0.5 mm/min), (2) a single shift halfway through treatment (10 mm), (3) a periodic drift (amplitude: 5 mm, period: 5 minutes), or (4) MR imaging-measured baseline drifts. Delivered dose was calculated under full consideration of the patient and machine motion interplay. In addition, trailing was experimentally validated on the MR-Linac using a programmable motion phantom. RESULTS: The average simulated delivery and beam-on times were 15.9 and 8.7 minutes, respectively. An imaging frequency of ≥1 Hz was deemed necessary for trailing. Trailing increased the median gross tumor volume D98% dose by 1.9 Gy (linear drift), 1.2 Gy (single shift), 0.7 Gy (periodic drift), and 0.5 to 1.5 Gy (measured drifts) per fraction, compared with a conventional delivery. In the phantom experiments, the 3%/2 mm local gamma pass rate nearly doubled to 98% when using trailing. CONCLUSION: Tumor trailing on the MR-Linac restores target dose in liver SBRT in the case of baseline motion for the presented patient cohort.
PURPOSE:Tumor trailing is a treatment delivery technique that continuously adjusts the beam aperture according to the last available time-averaged position of the target. This study investigates whether tumor trailing on a magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerator (linac) can improve target coverage in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the case of baseline motion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 17 patients with oligometastatic liver disease, midposition SBRT treatment plans (3 × 20 Gy, 11-beam intensity modulated radiotherapy) were created for the Elekta Unity MR-Linac. Treatment was simulated using an in-house-developed delivery emulator. Respiratory motion was modelled as the superposition of periodic motion (patient-specific amplitude, 4-second period) and the following baseline motion scenarios: a continuous linear drift (0.5 mm/min), (2) a single shift halfway through treatment (10 mm), (3) a periodic drift (amplitude: 5 mm, period: 5 minutes), or (4) MR imaging-measured baseline drifts. Delivered dose was calculated under full consideration of the patient and machine motion interplay. In addition, trailing was experimentally validated on the MR-Linac using a programmable motion phantom. RESULTS: The average simulated delivery and beam-on times were 15.9 and 8.7 minutes, respectively. An imaging frequency of ≥1 Hz was deemed necessary for trailing. Trailing increased the median gross tumor volume D98% dose by 1.9 Gy (linear drift), 1.2 Gy (single shift), 0.7 Gy (periodic drift), and 0.5 to 1.5 Gy (measured drifts) per fraction, compared with a conventional delivery. In the phantom experiments, the 3%/2 mm local gamma pass rate nearly doubled to 98% when using trailing. CONCLUSION:Tumor trailing on the MR-Linac restores target dose in liver SBRT in the case of baseline motion for the presented patient cohort.
Authors: Rosie J Goodburn; Marielle E P Philippens; Thierry L Lefebvre; Aly Khalifa; Tom Bruijnen; Joshua N Freedman; David E J Waddington; Eyesha Younus; Eric Aliotta; Gabriele Meliadò; Teo Stanescu; Wajiha Bano; Ali Fatemi-Ardekani; Andreas Wetscherek; Uwe Oelfke; Nico van den Berg; Ralph P Mason; Petra J van Houdt; James M Balter; Oliver J Gurney-Champion Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-09-21 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Naoyuki Shono; Brian Ninni; Franklin King; Takahisa Kato; Junichi Tokuda; Takahiro Fujimoto; Kemal Tuncali; Nobuhiko Hata Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-03-28 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Somayeh Gholami; Francesco Longo; Sara Shahzadeh; Hassan Ali Nedaie; Ryan Sharp; Ali S Meigooni Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2020-09-29
Authors: Maureen Lee; Anna Simeonov; Teo Stanescu; Laura A Dawson; Kristy K Brock; Michael Velec Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Samuel L Mulder; Jolien Heukelom; Brigid A McDonald; Lisanne Van Dijk; Kareem A Wahid; Keith Sanders; Travis C Salzillo; Mehdi Hemmati; Andrew Schaefer; Clifton D Fuller Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-04-10 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Christopher Kurz; Giulia Buizza; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Moritz Rabe; Chiara Paganelli; Guido Baroni; Michael Reiner; Paul J Keall; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Marco Riboldi Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Elena H Tran; Björn Eiben; Andreas Wetscherek; Uwe Oelfke; Gustav Meedt; David J Hawkes; Jamie R McClelland Journal: Biomed Phys Eng Express Date: 2020-06-12