Literature DB >> 30243217

Interference of engineered nanomaterials in flow cytometry: A case study.

Nils Bohmer1, Alexandra Rippl1, Sarah May1, Aurélie Walter2, Min Beom Heo3, Minjeong Kwak3, Matthias Roesslein1, Nam Woong Song3, Peter Wick1, Cordula Hirsch4.   

Abstract

Nanotechnology is regarded as the enabling technology of the 21st century. However, only a relatively small number of nano-enabled medical and healthcare products finally made their way to the market. There are several reasons why such innovative approaches fail in translation, with one key factor being the uncertainty surrounding their safety assessment. Although well described, interference reactions of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) with classical cytotoxicity assays remain a major source of uncertainty. Flow cytometry is a powerful, widely used, in vitro technique. Its readout is based on the detection of refracted laser light and fluorescence signals. It is therefore susceptible to ENM interference. Here we investigated possible interferences of ENM in the Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) assay, which quantifies apoptotic and necrotic cell populations by flow cytometry. Two case studies were conducted using either silica or gold nanoparticles differing in size, specific surface area and surface chemistry. Both ENM types were found to cause distinct interference reactions at realistic concentrations. Silica particles induced false-positive signals; however only in the absence of a protein corona and in conjunction with a particular fluorophore combination (FITC/PI). In contrast, gold particles led to complex quenching effects which were only marginally influenced by the presence of proteins and occurred for both fluorophore combinations analyzed. We present a versatile spike-in approach which is applicable to all ENM and cell types. It further allows for the identification of a broad range of different interference phenomena, thereby increasing the reliability and quality of flow cytometry and ENM hazard assessment.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flow cytometry; Fluorescence; Human cells; In vitro assay; Interference; Nanomaterials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30243217     DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces        ISSN: 0927-7765            Impact factor:   5.268


  9 in total

1.  Strategies for robust and accurate experimental approaches to quantify nanomaterial bioaccumulation across a broad range of organisms.

Authors:  Elijah J Petersen; Monika Mortimer; Robert M Burgess; Richard Handy; Shannon Hanna; Kay T Ho; Monique Johnson; Susana Loureiro; Henriette Selck; Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand; David Spurgeon; Jason Unrine; Nico van den Brink; Ying Wang; Jason White; Patricia Holden
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2019

Review 2.  Understanding nanoparticle endocytosis to improve targeting strategies in nanomedicine.

Authors:  Mauro Sousa de Almeida; Eva Susnik; Barbara Drasler; Patricia Taladriz-Blanco; Alke Petri-Fink; Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Evaluating the Apoptotic Cell Death Modulatory Activity of Nanoparticles in Men and Women Neutrophils and Eosinophils.

Authors:  Marion Vanharen; Isabelle Durocher; Abdelaziz Saafane; Denis Girard
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 4.  A Systematic Review on the Hazard Assessment of Amorphous Silica Based on the Literature From 2013 to 2018.

Authors:  Harald F Krug
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  In Vitro Research Reproducibility: Keeping Up High Standards.

Authors:  Cordula Hirsch; Stefan Schildknecht
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Label-Free Digital Holographic Microscopy for In Vitro Cytotoxic Effect Quantification of Organic Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Kai Moritz Eder; Anne Marzi; Álvaro Barroso; Steffi Ketelhut; Björn Kemper; Jürgen Schnekenburger
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  U.S. Federal Agency interests and key considerations for new approach methodologies for nanomaterials.

Authors:  Elijah J Petersen; Patricia Ceger; David G Allen; Jayme Coyle; Raymond Derk; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; John Gordon; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Joanna Matheson; Danielle McShan; Bryant C Nelson; Anil K Patri; Penelope Rice; Liying Rojanasakul; Abhilash Sasidharan; Louis Scarano; Xiaoqing Chang
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 6.250

8.  Long-Term Exposure to Nanosized TiO2 Triggers Stress Responses and Cell Death Pathways in Pulmonary Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Mayes Alswady-Hoff; Johanna Samulin Erdem; Santosh Phuyal; Oskar Knittelfelder; Animesh Sharma; Davi de Miranda Fonseca; Øivind Skare; Geir Slupphaug; Shanbeh Zienolddiny
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Assessing Genotoxicity of Ten Different Engineered Nanomaterials by the Novel Semi-Automated FADU Assay and the Alkaline Comet Assay.

Authors:  Sarah May; Cordula Hirsch; Alexandra Rippl; Alexander Bürkle; Peter Wick
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.076

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.