Literature DB >> 30243037

Sensitivity to pain expectations: A Bayesian model of individual differences.

R Hoskin1, C Berzuini2, D Acosta-Kane3, W El-Deredy4, H Guo2, D Talmi5.   

Abstract

The thoughts and feelings people have about pain (referred to as 'pain expectations') are known to alter the perception of pain. However little is known about the cognitive processes that underpin pain expectations, or what drives the differing effect that pain expectations have between individuals. This paper details the testing of a model of pain perception which formalises the response to pain in terms of a Bayesian prior-to-posterior updating process. Using data acquired from a short and deception-free predictive cue task, it was found that this Bayesian model predicted ratings of pain better than other, simpler models. At the group level, the results confirmed two core predictions of predictive coding; that expectation alters perception, and that increased uncertainty in the expectation reduces its impact on perception. The addition of parameters relating to trait differences in pain expectation improved the fit of the model, suggesting that such traits play a significant role in perception above and beyond the influence of expectations triggered by predictive cues. When the model parameters were allowed to vary by participant, the model's fit improved further. This final model produced a characterisation of each individual's sensitivity to pain expectations. This model is relevant for the understanding of the cognitive basis of pain expectations and could potentially act as a useful tool for guiding patient stratification and clinical experimentation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes; Expectation; Pain; Perception; Placebo effect; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30243037     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  9 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual variability: Implications for learning and generalization.

Authors:  Jonas Zaman; Anastasia Chalkia; Ann-Kathrin Zenses; Antoine Selim Bilgin; Tom Beckers; Bram Vervliet; Yannick Boddez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02

Review 2.  The neuroscience of vision and pain: evolution of two disciplines.

Authors:  Barbara L Finlay
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Computational psychiatry: from synapses to sentience.

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 13.437

4.  Therapeutic Alliance as Active Inference: The Role of Therapeutic Touch and Biobehavioural Synchrony in Musculoskeletal Care.

Authors:  Zoe McParlin; Francesco Cerritelli; Giacomo Rossettini; Karl J Friston; Jorge E Esteves
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Perceptual sensory attenuation in chronic pain subjects and healthy controls.

Authors:  David McNaughton; Alissa Beath; Julia Hush; Michael Jones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Predictive coding models for pain perception.

Authors:  Yuru Song; Mingchen Yao; Helen Kemprecos; Aine Byrne; Zhengdong Xiao; Qiaosheng Zhang; Amrita Singh; Jing Wang; Zhe S Chen
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Effect of Combined Thoracic Paravertebral Block and General Anesthesia vs General Anesthesia Alone on Postoperative Stress and Pain in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Tao Tang; Fengjiao Lang; Shoulin Gao; Li Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-01-09

8.  The effect of uncertainty on pain decisions for self and others.

Authors:  Leyla Loued-Khenissi; Sandra Martin-Brevet; Luis Schumacher; Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.651

9.  Pessimistic dairy calves are more vulnerable to pain-induced anhedonia.

Authors:  Benjamin Lecorps; Emeline Nogues; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.