Esben Nielsen1,2, Mats Lundström3, Konrad Pesudovs4, Jesper Hjortdal2,5. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 2. Friklinikken, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark. 3. Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 4. Australian College of Optometry, Carlton, Victoria, Australia. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The primary goal was to validate a Danish translated version of the Catquest-9SF by Rasch analysis. The secondary goal was to investigate whether preoperative Catquest-9SF scores, best-corrected visual acuity, comorbidity, gender, age or corneal astigmatism could predict improvements in subjective outcome. METHODS: In a prospective trial, 250 patients eligible for cataract surgery were included. Patients filled out the translated Catquest-9SF questionnaire before surgery and again 3 months after surgery. Both preoperative and postoperative questionnaires were included in the Rasch analysis. A multiple reverse stepwise regression model was used to investigate the correlation between preoperative measurements and subjective improvement. RESULTS: The preliminary Rasch analysis showed misfit of items 4 and 6. These items were removed, and the remaining seven items demonstrated a measurement precision of 2.78, a person reliability coefficient of 0.89, ordered response categories, infit of 0.69-1.22, outfit of 0.73-1.14, observed raw variance explained by measures of 70.4% and an eigenvalue of 1.7. Item 7 showed a mild DIF for gender (0.54 logits), and person mean Rasch score targeting was -1.69 logits. Preoperative Catquest score was the only parameter with a significant correlation to a gain in subjective outcome (p < 0.001). A preoperative Catquest-9SF score of 0.5 carried a 95% likelihood of an increase in subjective outcome. CONCLUSION: The Danish version of the Catquest-9SF fit the Rasch model. Only preoperative Catquest-9SF score was correlated to subjective improvement, and a cut-off value of 0.5 predicted an improvement in subjective outcome with 95% probability.
PURPOSE: The primary goal was to validate a Danish translated version of the Catquest-9SF by Rasch analysis. The secondary goal was to investigate whether preoperative Catquest-9SF scores, best-corrected visual acuity, comorbidity, gender, age or corneal astigmatism could predict improvements in subjective outcome. METHODS: In a prospective trial, 250 patients eligible for cataract surgery were included. Patients filled out the translated Catquest-9SF questionnaire before surgery and again 3 months after surgery. Both preoperative and postoperative questionnaires were included in the Rasch analysis. A multiple reverse stepwise regression model was used to investigate the correlation between preoperative measurements and subjective improvement. RESULTS: The preliminary Rasch analysis showed misfit of items 4 and 6. These items were removed, and the remaining seven items demonstrated a measurement precision of 2.78, a person reliability coefficient of 0.89, ordered response categories, infit of 0.69-1.22, outfit of 0.73-1.14, observed raw variance explained by measures of 70.4% and an eigenvalue of 1.7. Item 7 showed a mild DIF for gender (0.54 logits), and person mean Rasch score targeting was -1.69 logits. Preoperative Catquest score was the only parameter with a significant correlation to a gain in subjective outcome (p < 0.001). A preoperative Catquest-9SF score of 0.5 carried a 95% likelihood of an increase in subjective outcome. CONCLUSION: The Danish version of the Catquest-9SF fit the Rasch model. Only preoperative Catquest-9SF score was correlated to subjective improvement, and a cut-off value of 0.5 predicted an improvement in subjective outcome with 95% probability.
Authors: Julia F-M Gilmartin-Thomas; Andrew Forbes; Danny Liew; John J McNeil; Flavia M Cicuttini; Alice J Owen; Michael E Ernst; Mark R Nelson; Jessica Lockery; Stephanie A Ward; Ljoudmila Busija Journal: Pain Pract Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Gregory Katz; Alexandra Rouquette; François Lignereux; Thierry Mourgues; Michel Weber; Mats Lundström Journal: Eye Vis (Lond) Date: 2021-04-01