| Literature DB >> 30242738 |
Meenakshi Bhatia1, Megha Saini2.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to improve the release rate of curcumin by microsponges prepared through quasi-emulsion solvent diffusion technique using ethylcellulose and PVA as carriers. The microsponges were characterized by FTIR, DSC, XRD and SEM studies followed by determination of total drug content and entrapment efficiency. The prepared microsponges were further filled in hard gelatin capsule shell and then loaded in carbopol gel to evaluate its potential in oral and topical drug delivery. Further, it was observed from the studies on release rate that microsponges filled in hard gelatin capsule shells (batch MS4) showed 93.2% release of curcumin whereas pure curcumin filled in capsule showed only 11.7% release in 8 h study. Furthermore, the microsponges loaded in carbopol gel were evaluated for ex vivo drug deposition studies and it was found that 77.5% of the curcumin was released within 24 h. The estimated drug remained in the skin was 207.61 ± 5.03 μg/cm2 as determined by a Franz diffusion cell. The drug release profile data were found to be fitted best into the zero-order model with anomalous transport mechanism of drug release in both cases.Entities:
Keywords: Curcumin; Microsponges; Quasi-emulsion solvent diffusion technique
Year: 2018 PMID: 30242738 PMCID: PMC6173672 DOI: 10.1007/s40204-018-0099-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Biomater ISSN: 2194-0517
Composition of different batches of microsponge formulations
| Formulation | Curcumin (mg) | Ethyl cellulose (mg) | Dichloromethane (mL) | Polyvinyl alcohol (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS1 | 100 | 100 | 5 | 0.5 |
| MS2 | 200 | 100 | 5 | 0.5 |
| MS3 | 300 | 100 | 5 | 0.5 |
| MS4 | 400 | 100 | 5 | 0.5 |
| MS5 | 500 | 100 | 5 | 0.5 |
Effect of drug to polymer ratio on various parameters
| Formulation code | Drug/polymer ratio | Total drug content (%) | Production yield (% ± SD) | Mean particle size (µm) | Entrapment efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS1 | 1:1 | 24.5 ± 2.9 | 57.3 ± 1.5 | 97.4 ± 2.9 | 21.3 ± 2.7 |
| MS2 | 2:1 | 32.2 ± 3.5 | 66.6 ± 2.8 | 103.5 ± 1.8 | 30.2 ± 2.3 |
| MS3 | 3:1 | 59.8 ± 3.3 | 85.3 ± 2.3 | 163.4 ± 2.7 | 55.8 ± 2.5 |
| MS4 | 4:1 | 97.2 ± 1.5 | 95.2 ± 1.3 | 183.6 ± 2.3 | 93.2 ± 2.4 |
| MS5 | 5:1 | 64.7 ± 2.1 | 77.2 ± 3.2 | 196.9 ± 3.0 | 61.7 ± 2.2 |
Fig. 1FTIR spectra of (a) CUR, (b) EC and (c) CUR microsponges
Fig. 2DSC of curcumin, ethyl cellulose and microsponge
Fig. 3SEM image of CUR microsponges
Fig. 4XRD spectra of (a) CUR, (b) EC and (c) CUR microsponges
Fig. 5a In vitro drug release profile of curcumin, b viscosity of carbopol gel and curcumin microsponge gel, c ex vivo drug release profile of curcumin
Evaluation of spreadability, hardness and adhesiveness of gels
| Formulation | Spreadability (diameter in cm) | Hardness (g) | Adhesiveness (g.s.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbopol gel | 2.6 | 3.85 ± 0.36 | 17.43 |
| Formulation gel | 1.8 | 3.40 ± 0.1 | 16.08 |
Fig. 6Texture analysis of a carbopol gel and b CUR microsponges gel