Literature DB >> 30240751

MOF-derived Cobalt Sulfide Grown on 3D Graphene Foam as an Efficient Sulfur Host for Long-Life Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.

Jiarui He1, Yuanfu Chen2, Arumugam Manthiram3.   

Abstract

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are an appealing candidate for advanced energy storage systems because of their high theoretical energy density and low cost. However, rapid capacity decay and short cycle life, mainly resulting from polysulfide dissolution, remains a great challenge for practical applications. Herein, we present a metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived Co9S8 array anchored onto a chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-grown three-dimensional graphene foam (Co9S8-3DGF) as an efficient sulfur host for long-life Li-S batteries with good performance. Without polymeric binders, conductive additives, or metallic current collectors, the free-standing Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode achieves a high areal capacity of 10.9 mA hr cm-2 even at a very high sulfur loading (10.4 mg cm-2) and sulfur content (86.9 wt%). These results are attributed to the unique hierarchical nanoarchitecture of Co9S8-3DGF/S. This work is expected to open up a promising direction for the practical viability of high-energy Li-S batteries.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy Materials; Inorganic Chemistry; Porous Material

Year:  2018        PMID: 30240751      PMCID: PMC6146594          DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  iScience        ISSN: 2589-0042


Introduction

With the advances in portable electronics and interest in electric vehicles, the demand for high-performance energy storage devices is exponentially growing (Ji et al., 2016, Ji et al., 2017, Cao et al., 2014, He et al., 2016a, He et al., 2016b, He et al., 2016c, He et al., 2017a, He et al., 2017b). Rechargeable lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are appealing as one of the most attractive candidates for energy storage because of their high theoretical energy density and capacity (Manthiram et al., 2014, Manthiram et al., 2015, Wu et al., 2016, He et al., 2017a, He et al., 2017b, Zhou et al., 2015a, Zhou et al., 2015b, Zhong et al., 2018). However, Li-S batteries still face serious drawbacks toward practical applications, including the insulating nature of sulfur and the migration of soluble lithium polysulfides (LiPSs), which give rise to low capacity and rapid capacity decay (Chung and Manthiram, 2018, Kim et al., 2014, He et al., 2016a, He et al., 2016b, He et al., 2016c, Xia et al., 2017). Extensive strategies have been proposed to address these issues. A combination of sulfur and conductive carbonaceous materials, such as reduced graphene oxide, three-dimensional graphene foam (3DGF), carbon nanotube, or conducting polymers, has been considered as an effective approach to improve the electrical conductivity of the electrode and physically confine the soluble LiPSs (He et al., 2015, Chen et al., 2013, Sun et al., 2014). However, due to the weak physical interaction between nonpolar carbonaceous materials and polar LiPSs, the severe capacity degradation still remains during long-term cycling (Zhou et al., 2017, Li et al., 2015, Liu et al., 2017a, Liu et al., 2017b, Xia et al., 2018). Recently, it has been illustrated that polar materials can significantly improve the chemical adsorption capability for LiPSs, and strenuous efforts have been pursued to develop polar sulfur hosts with strong chemical interaction toward polysulfides species. For example, metal-organic frameworks (MOF) with strong Lewis acid-base interactions for LiPSs are efficient in entrapping polar LiPSs (Zheng et al., 2014, He et al., 2016a, He et al., 2016b, He et al., 2016c) and improving cycling stability when used in the cathodes of Li-S batteries. Polar oxides, such as TiO2, MnO2, SiO2, and V2O5, have also been explored as host materials for Li-S batteries owing to their strong affinity to LiPSs (Zhou et al., 2015a, Zhou et al., 2015b, Kong et al., 2017, Liu et al., 2017a, Liu et al., 2017b). However, these oxides usually have relatively poor electrical conductivity, which tends to slow down the electrode kinetics and thus compromises the utilization of sulfur and the rate capability (Pu et al., 2017). Therefore, metal sulfides (Co9S8, CoS2, and Co3S4) and metal nitride (TiN) with high conductivity and strong chemical interaction for LiPSs have been proposed as hosts for sulfur in Li-S batteries (Pang et al., 2016, Yuan et al., 2016, Chen et al., 2017, Li et al., 2017). However, rational nanoarchitecture designs to improve the utilization of sulfur particularly at higher sulfur loading and content is still challenging, and most of such sulfur composite cathodes still require polymer binders, conductive additives, and metallic current collectors, which not only reduce the power density of the cell but also degrade the long-term cycling. Herein, we choose a chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-grown 3DGF with high conductivity and excellent flexibility as a binder-free, free-standing skeleton and the conductive hollow polar cobalt sulfide (Co9S8) arrays directly grown on 3DGF skeleton as an efficient sulfur host for Li-S batteries. Benefiting from the well-designed hierarchical Co9S8-3DGF nanoarchitecture, the hollow Co9S8 nanowall arrays anchored onto 3DGF offer abundant nanoporous space to accommodate a large amount of sulfur, allow sufficient electrolyte penetration, and facilitate the transport of ions/electrons. The binder-free, free-standing Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode without polymer binders, conductive additives, and metallic current collectors delivers a remarkably high areal capacity of 10.9 mA hr cm−2 even with a very high sulfur loading (10.4 mg cm−2) and sulfur content (86.9 wt%) and exhibits significant improvement in the specific capacity, rate capability, and long-term cycling stability.

Results

The synthetic strategy of the Co9S8-3DGF/S is schematically shown in Figure 1A; for detailed synthesis procedure, see the Transparent Methods. First, a facile solution method was used to grow cobalt-based MOF solid nanowall arrays onto a piece of 3DGF. Then, through a subsequent solvothermal reaction with thioacetamide (TAA) in ethanol, the Co-MOF solid nanowall arrays were transformed to hollow Co9S8 arrays. The color of Co-MOF/3DGF changed from purple to black after the transformation to Co9S8-3DGF (Figure S1). After this sulfurization treatment, the obtained Co9S8-3DGF was mixed with an appropriate amount of sulfur, and the sulfur was impregnated into the Co9S8-3DGF by a modified melt-diffusion strategy. Benefiting from the efficient surface bonding between the Co9S8 nanowall arrays and the sulfur species, the dissolution and migration of LiPSs were effectively alleviated during the charge/discharge process (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Schematic Diagram of the Co9S8-3DGF/S Composite

(A) Schematic of the synthetic procedure of the Co9S8-3DGF/S composite.

(B) Advantages of the Co9S8-3DGF/S composite over 3DGF/S.

Schematic Diagram of the Co9S8-3DGF/S Composite (A) Schematic of the synthetic procedure of the Co9S8-3DGF/S composite. (B) Advantages of the Co9S8-3DGF/S composite over 3DGF/S. Through a facile solution method, the solid Co-MOF nanowall arrays are uniformly grown onto the 3DGF. The scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images in Figures 2A–2C show that the skeleton of 3DGF is homogenously coated by a solid Co-MOF with nanowall morphology. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the Co-MOF in Figure S2 are in agreement with previous reports (Guan et al., 2017). Figure 2D illustrates that the typical array morphology and a uniform coating on 3DGF are maintained after sulfurization treatment with TAA. As shown in Figures 2E, 2F, and S3, a hollow structure is formed in Co9S8-3DGF, which can be attributed to the Kirkendall effect (Liu et al., 2016). Specific surface area results further confirm the high specific area of Co9S8-3DGF (Figure S4). The absence of the Co-MOF peaks in the XRD pattern of Co9S8-3DGF (Figure S5A) confirms the successful transformation from Co-MOF to Co9S8. After the sulfur impregnation into Co9S8-3DGF, the architecture of Co9S8-3DGF/S still remains as nanowall arrays, as shown in Figure 2G. It is worth noticing that those nanowall arrays are solid, indicating that the sulfur has been effectively confined into the hollow Co9S8 nanowall arrays (Figures 2H and 2I). Such a unique architecture with an excellent interfacial contact between sulfur-Co9S8 and 3DGF can help realize the fast diffusion of LiPSs on the Co9S8 surface to the highly conductive graphene surface. As a result, strong entrapment (by Co9S8) and fast electron transfer (by 3DGF) for LiPS conversion can be simultaneously realized, avoiding the accumulation of LiPSs and improving their utilization. The XRD pattern of Co9S8-3DGF/S (Figure S5A) also suggests the successful introduction of sulfur. The SEM images and the corresponding elemental mappings in Figures S6A–S6F evidently indicate a uniform distribution of Co9S8 and S in Co9S8-3DGF/S. The TGA curves (Figure S5B) show that the content of sulfur in Co9S8-3DGF/S is 79.2 wt.% (6.2 mg cm−2). For comparison, 3DGF/S was also prepared. Owing to the hydrophobic nature of the 3DGF, the hosted sulfur on 3DGF tends to severely aggregate into bulk particles (Figure S7).
Figure 2

Morphology and Microstructure Analysis of the Co9S8-3DGF/S Cathode

Various magnification SEM inspections of (A–C) Co-MOF-3DGF, (D–F) Co9S8-3DGF, and (G–I) Co9S8-3DGF/S.

Morphology and Microstructure Analysis of the Co9S8-3DGF/S Cathode Various magnification SEM inspections of (A–C) Co-MOF-3DGF, (D–F) Co9S8-3DGF, and (G–I) Co9S8-3DGF/S.

Discussion

To demonstrate that such a rational architecture of Co9S8-3DGF is beneficial for the electrochemical properties of Li-S batteries, the Co9S8-3DGF/S was cut and directly used as a binder-free, free-standing cathode. As shown in Figure 3A, the cyclic voltammetry (CV) profiles in the first four cycles of the cell with Co9S8-3DGF/S are obtained with a sulfur loading of 6.2 mg cm−2 at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in the voltage range of 1.8–2.8 V. Compared with our previous reports, Co9S8-3DGF/S shows a similar electrochemical reaction (Qie and Manthiram, 2016, Su and Manthiram, 2012, Xu and Manthiram, 2017, Xu et al., 2016). The two main reduction peaks at 2.34 and 1.97 V in the initial cathodic sweep reflect the transformation of S to long-chain LiPSs and ultimately to Li2S. The oxidation peak located at 2.41 V corresponds to the conversion of Li2S to LiPSs and finally to sulfur. The overlapped CV profiles after the initial cycles evidence the highly reversible electrochemical process. As shown in Figure S8, the rate-dependent CV curves of Co9S8-3DGF/S were obtained and the corresponding Li-ion diffusion coefficient (D) was calculated. The D values of C1, C2, and A peaks are, respectively, 1.72 ×10−8, 4.85 × 10−8, and 2.91 × 10−8 cm2 s−1. These D values are close to the values in our previous report (Chung et al., 2016). Importantly, the polarization of the Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode with a high sulfur loading (6.2 mg cm−2) and high sulfur content (79.6 wt.%) remains low during the electrochemical process. Considering the above structural analyses on Co9S8-3DGF/S, such low polarization is due to the unique architecture of Co9S8-3DGF/S offering excellent trapping-diffusion conversion process. Such results were further confirmed by the impedance values of Co9S8-3DGF/S relative to those of 3DGF/S (Figure S9). The charge/discharge curves of the cell with Co9S8-3DGF/S at C/10 rate (1C = 1,675 mA g−1) well coincide with its CV behavior. (Figure 3B) Remarkably, the potential plateaus remain the same even after 200 cycles, implying an excellent immobilization of Co9S8-3DGF/S for sulfur species.
Figure 3

Electrochemical Performance of the Co9S8-3DGF/S Cathode

(A) CV curves of the Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode at 0.1 mV s−1 at 1.8–2.8 V.

(B) Charge/discharge profiles of the Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode.

(C) Cycling stability of the Co9S8-3DGF/S and 3DGF/S cathodes at C/10 rate for 200 cycles.

(D) Rate performances at various cycling rates of the Co9S8-3DGF/S and 3DGF/S electrodes.

(E) Cycling performances of the Co9S8-3DGF/S electrodes for long-term cycling at 1C rate.

Electrochemical Performance of the Co9S8-3DGF/S Cathode (A) CV curves of the Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode at 0.1 mV s−1 at 1.8–2.8 V. (B) Charge/discharge profiles of the Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode. (C) Cycling stability of the Co9S8-3DGF/S and 3DGF/S cathodes at C/10 rate for 200 cycles. (D) Rate performances at various cycling rates of the Co9S8-3DGF/S and 3DGF/S electrodes. (E) Cycling performances of the Co9S8-3DGF/S electrodes for long-term cycling at 1C rate. The cyclic performances at C/10 rate in the voltage range of 1.8–2.8 V for the Co9S8-3DGF/S and 3DGF/S cathodes were measured with the same sulfur loading of 6.2 mg cm−2. Co9S8-3DGF/S exhibits pronounced cycling stability with a high capacity retention of 84.9% after 200 cycles, as shown in Figure 3C. Importantly, even after 200 cycles, Co9S8-3DGF/S still can maintain its nanowall array morphology (Figure S10). By sharp contrast, the 3DGF/S cathode shows a rapid capacity degradation after 200 cycles with a poor capacity retention of 42.8%. The fast capacity decay of 3DGF/S is attributed to the weak affinity of 3DGF to sulfur species and poor physical entrapment. To better understand the synergistic effect of each component and to optimize the electrochemical performances, the electrochemical performance of Co9S8-3DGF/S with a Co9S8 loading of 2.3 mg cm−2 was obtained. As shown in Figure S11, although a higher content of Co9S8 can improve the adsorption toward LiPSs, it will decrease the conductivity of the electrode. As a result, the utilization of active materials decreases and the specific capacity of the cathode is low. The visual observations of Co9S8-3DGF/S and 3DGF/S confirm that polysulfide dissolution is effectively mitigated in Co9S8-3DGF/S during the charge/discharge process (Figure S12). The rate capabilities of the cells with Co9S8-3DGF/S at various rates from C/20 to 2C are shown in Figures 3D and S13. At a C/20 rate, the cell with Co9S8-3DGF/S delivers a high specific capacity of 1,306 mA hr g−1. Even at a high rate of 2C, the capacity of the cell with Co9S8-3DGF/S still remains stable at 670 mA hr g−1, which is significantly better than that of the cell with 3DGF/S (74.9 mA hr g−1) under the same conditions. Furthermore, when the C-rate is switched back to C/20, the capacity of the cell with Co9S8-3DGF/S recovers to the original value, indicating the excellent mechanical stability within the cathode. It is known that the long-term charge/discharge process is still a challenge for high-sulfur-loading cathodes. To further illustrate the structural advantages of Co9S8-3DGF/S, the prolonged cycling performance was evaluated at 1C rate for 500 cycles. As shown in Figure 3E, the Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode exhibits an extraordinary cyclic stability with a high capacity retention of 77.2%. Even at a high rate of 1C after 500 cycles, the Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode still delivers 736 mA hr g−1. The areal capacity of the Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode was also assessed. As shown in Figure 4, the Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode with a sulfur loading of 6.2 mg cm−2 delivers at C/10 rate a high areal capacity of 7.6 mA hr cm−2, which is much higher than that of commercial lithium-ion batteries (typically 4 mA hr cm−2) (Hu et al., 2016). Furthermore, an even higher areal capacity of 10.9 mA hr cm−2 could be realized at a rate of C/10 by increasing the sulfur loading to 10.4 mg cm−2 (86.9 wt.%). It is obvious that the areal capacity of our Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode is much higher compared with those of recently reported high-areal-capacity Li-S cathodes with higher sulfur loading (Table S1). This value is nearly three times more than that of commercial Li-ion batteries, indicating the promise of Co9S8-3DGF/S cathodes. In addition, even with such a high sulfur loading of 10.4 mg cm−2, the Co9S8-3DGF/S cathode still exhibits good cycling stability for 200 cycles. Such impressive features imply that the Co9S8-3DGF/S is an attractive cathode for the practical Li-S batteries.
Figure 4

The Electrochemical Performance of Co9S8-3DGF/S Cathode with High Sulfur Loading

(A) Cycling performances of the Co9S8-3DGF/S electrodes with 6.2, 8.1, and 10.4 mg cm−2 sulfur loadings and (B) the corresponding areal capacities.

The Electrochemical Performance of Co9S8-3DGF/S Cathode with High Sulfur Loading (A) Cycling performances of the Co9S8-3DGF/S electrodes with 6.2, 8.1, and 10.4 mg cm−2 sulfur loadings and (B) the corresponding areal capacities. The SEM images of the lithium foils and the photographs of the separators recovered from the cells with the Co9S8-3DGF/S and 3DGF/S cathodes after 200 cycles were further analyzed to elucidate the excellent confinement of the sulfur species within Co9S8-3DGF/S (Figures S14 and S15). Severe corrosion observed on the surface of lithium foil with the 3DGF/S cathode indicates that the 3DGF can only provide weak protection for lithium foil from LiPSs. The obvious color changes of the separator in the cell with 3DGF/S further imply the existence of severe shuttle effects. In addition, the photographs of the absorption experiments of 3DGF and Co9S8-3DGF visually demonstrate that Co9S8 can provide strong interaction for LiPSs (Figure 5). Correspondingly, a dramatic decrease can also be detected in the ultraviolet (UV)-visible absorption spectra. The peak intensity of the S62− species is much lower for Co9S8-3DGF than for 3DGF, implying that Co9S8-3DGF has better affinity and strong adsorption. Moreover, to further quantitatively evaluate the chemical adsorption of Co9S8 for LiPSs, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was carried out. After contacting with Li2S6 for 1 hr, the peaks of Co 2p3/2 shifts toward higher binding energies and the satellite peaks become obvious, implying electron transfer from Li2S6 molecules to Co, as shown in Figure S16 (Pu et al., 2017). Such an analysis directly indicates a strong chemical interaction between Co9S8 and Li2S6 and evidently provides insights on the electrochemical improvement offered by Co9S8-3DGF/S.
Figure 5

Adsorption of Co9S8-3DGF toward Lithium Polysulfides

UV-visible spectra of the Li2S6 solution with 3DGF and Co9S8-3DGF. Inset: the photograph of the sealed vials of a Li2S6 solution with a solvent of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) after contacting with 3DGF and Co9S8-3DGF for 1 hr.

Adsorption of Co9S8-3DGF toward Lithium Polysulfides UV-visible spectra of the Li2S6 solution with 3DGF and Co9S8-3DGF. Inset: the photograph of the sealed vials of a Li2S6 solution with a solvent of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) after contacting with 3DGF and Co9S8-3DGF for 1 hr. In summary, the rational design and fabrication of MOF-derived cobalt sulfide arrays anchored onto 3DGF (Co9S8-3DGF) has been presented as an efficient sulfur host for long-life, highly efficient Li-S batteries. The Co9S8-3DGF/S can be directly used as a binder-free, free-standing cathode. Moreover, the Co9S8-3DGF/S exhibits pronounced electrochemical performance owing to its unique 3D hierarchical nanoarchitecture, which can synergistically realize a strong chemical entrapment of LiPSs (by Co9S8) and fast transport of electrons (by 3DGF), avoid the accumulation of LiPSs, and improve the utilization of sulfur. As a result, Co9S8-3DGF/S with a very high sulfur loading of 10.4 mg cm−2 delivers excellent electrochemical performance. This work provides new insights into the rational design of binder-free, free-standing cathodes for highly efficient Li-S batteries.

Methods

All methods can be found in the accompanying Transparent Methods supplemental file.
  23 in total

1.  Infiltrated Porous Polymer Sheets as Free-Standing Flexible Lithium-Sulfur Battery Electrodes.

Authors:  Feixiang Wu; Enbo Zhao; Daniel Gordon; Yiran Xiao; Chenchen Hu; Gleb Yushin
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Metal oxide-coated three-dimensional graphene prepared by the use of metal-organic frameworks as precursors.

Authors:  Xiehong Cao; Bing Zheng; Xianhong Rui; Wenhui Shi; Qingyu Yan; Hua Zhang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  A flexible sulfur-graphene-polypropylene separator integrated electrode for advanced Li-S batteries.

Authors:  Guangmin Zhou; Lu Li; Da-Wei Wang; Xu-Yi Shan; Songfeng Pei; Feng Li; Hui-Ming Cheng
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Self-Templated Formation of Interlaced Carbon Nanotubes Threaded Hollow Co3S4 Nanoboxes for High-Rate and Heat-Resistant Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Zewen Zhang; Baorui Cheng; Renpeng Chen; Yi Hu; Lianbo Ma; Guoyin Zhu; Jie Liu; Zhong Jin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Powering Lithium-Sulfur Battery Performance by Propelling Polysulfide Redox at Sulfiphilic Hosts.

Authors:  Zhe Yuan; Hong-Jie Peng; Ting-Zheng Hou; Jia-Qi Huang; Cheng-Meng Chen; Dai-Wei Wang; Xin-Bing Cheng; Fei Wei; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 11.189

6.  Confining Sulfur in N-Doped Porous Carbon Microspheres Derived from Microalgaes for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.

Authors:  Yang Xia; Ruyi Fang; Zhen Xiao; Hui Huang; Yongping Gan; Rongjun Yan; Xianghong Lu; Chu Liang; Jun Zhang; Xinyong Tao; Wenkui Zhang
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 9.229

7.  A Carbon-Cotton Cathode with Ultrahigh-Loading Capability for Statically and Dynamically Stable Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.

Authors:  Sheng-Heng Chung; Chi-Hao Chang; Arumugam Manthiram
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 15.881

8.  Graphene-based three-dimensional hierarchical sandwich-type architecture for high-performance Li/S batteries.

Authors:  Renjie Chen; Teng Zhao; Jun Lu; Feng Wu; Li Li; Junzheng Chen; Guoqiang Tan; Yusheng Ye; Khalil Amine
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  3D Graphene-Foam-Reduced-Graphene-Oxide Hybrid Nested Hierarchical Networks for High-Performance Li-S Batteries.

Authors:  Guangjian Hu; Chuan Xu; Zhenhua Sun; Shaogang Wang; Hui-Ming Cheng; Feng Li; Wencai Ren
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  Lithium-sulphur batteries with a microporous carbon paper as a bifunctional interlayer.

Authors:  Yu-Sheng Su; Arumugam Manthiram
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  A N-doped graphene-cobalt nickel sulfide aerogel as a sulfur host for lithium-sulfur batteries.

Authors:  Ping Wu; Hai-Yan Hu; Ning Xie; Chen Wang; Fan Wu; Ming Pan; Hua-Fei Li; Xiao-Di Wang; Zheling Zeng; Shuguang Deng; Gui-Ping Dai
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.036

2.  Transformation of ZIF-8 nanoparticles into 3D nitrogen-doped hierarchically porous carbon for Li-S batteries.

Authors:  Guiqiang Cao; Da Bi; Jingxiang Zhao; Jing Zheng; Zhikang Wang; Qingxue Lai; Yanyu Liang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.361

3.  N-doped graphene foam obtained by microwave-assisted exfoliation of graphite.

Authors:  Malgorzata Skorupska; Anna Ilnicka; Jerzy P Lukaszewicz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Lignin Nanoparticle-Coated Celgard Separator for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.

Authors:  Zengyao Zhang; Shun Yi; Yuejia Wei; Huiyang Bian; Ruibin Wang; Yonggang Min
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.329

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.