| Literature DB >> 30240606 |
Shumeng Wang1, Lei Zhao1, Baohua Zhang2, Junqiao Ding3, Zhiyuan Xie4, Lixiang Wang4, Wai-Yeung Wong5.
Abstract
A high-energy-level blue phosphorEntities:
Keywords: Inorganic Materials; Optoelectronics; Organometallic Chemistry
Year: 2018 PMID: 30240606 PMCID: PMC6137322 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.07.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: iScience ISSN: 2589-0042
Figure 1Design of High-Energy-Level Blue Phosphors
(A) Molecular structures of blue phosphors (FIrpic, FIr-m-OC8 and FIr-p-OC8).
(B) UV-Vis absorption spectra in dichloromethane (DCM) together with photoluminescent (PL) spectra in toluene (The black circles and arrows indicate the corrsponding vertical axis for each data curves).
(C) PL decay curves in toluene.
(D) Cyclic voltammograms in solution using 0.1M n-Bu4NClO4 as supporting electrolyte at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1.
(E) HOMO/LUMO level alignment of the blue phosphors.
Also see Scheme S1 and Figure S1.
Figure 3Analysis of the Hole Scattering-Induced Influence
(A) Working mechanism of FIrpic-based blue device.
(B) Current density-voltage characteristics of FIrpic-based hole-only devices with different doping concentration of 0, 1, 5, and 15 wt.%.
(C) Transient EL decay curves for FIrpic-based blue device with a doping concentration of 15 wt. %.
(D) Working mechanism of FIr-p-OC8-based blue device.
(E) Current density-voltage characteristics of FIr-p-OC8-based hole-only devices with different doping concentration of 0, 1, 5, and 15 wt.%.
(F) Transient EL decay curves for FIr-p-OC8-based blue device with a doping concentration of 15 wt.%.
Also see Figure S4 and Table S1.
Summary of Photophysical, Electrochemical, and Thermal Properties for the Dendritic Host and Blue Phosphors
| Material | λabs(logɛ) | λem | PLQY | τ(μs) | Eox | Ered | HOMO | LUMO (eV) | T1 | Tm/Td (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2 | 242 (5.5), 268 (5.1), 288 (5.1), 298 (5.2), 350 (4.5) | 391, 408 | – | – | 0.48 | – | −5.28 | −1.91 | 2.86 | −/− |
| FIrpic | 256 (4.7), 381 (3.8), 412 (3.5), 427 (3.3), 456 (2.8) | 472, 499 | 0.60 | 1.02 | 0.84 | −2.18 | −5.64 | −2.62 | 2.63 | ND/330 |
| FIr- | 244 (4.7), 263 (4.6), 323 (4.2), 371 (3.8), 379 (3.7) | 481, 497 | 0.23 | 1.96 | 0.64 | −2.43 | −5.44 | −2.37 | 2.58 | 155/337 |
| FIr- | 265 (4.8), 347 (4.1), 381 (3.9), 417 (3.4), 448 (2.9) | 462, 485 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.48 | −2.56 | −5.28 | −2.24 | 2.69 | 222/341 |
Also see Figures S2–S4, and Table S1.
Measured in DCM at 298 K with a concentration of 10−5 M.
Measured in toluene at 298 K with a concentration of 10−5 M.
Measured in degassed toluene at 298 K excited at 350 nm with a concentration of 10−5 M using a calibrated integrating sphere.
Measured in degassed toluene at 298 K, and the lifetimes were obtained by a monoexponential fit of PL decay curves.
Eox is the first oxidation onset measured in DCM, and Ered is the first reduction onset measured in DMF.
The HOMO and LUMO energy levels were calculated according to the equations: HOMO = -e(Eox+ 4.8 V) and LUMO = -e(Ered+ 4.8 V).
The LUMO levels are calculated according to the equation: LUMO = HOMO + Eg, where Eg is the optical bandgap estimated from the absorption onset.
The triplet energy levels were calculated according to the phosphorescence peak wavelength positioned on the shortest wavelength side measured in toluene solution with a concentration of 10−5 M.
Figure 2Performance Comparison between FIrpic- and FIr-p-OC8-Based Blue Devices with the Same Doping Concentration (15 wt. %)
(A) Current density-voltage-luminance characteristics (The black circles and arrows indicate the corrsponding vertical axis for each data curves).
(B) Power efficiency-luminance characteristics.
Also see Figures S5 and S6, and Table S2.
Figure 4Performance of FIr-p-OC8-Based Blue and White Devices with an EML Composed of H2, 25 wt.%; FIr-p-OC8, x wt.% Ir(Flpy-CF3)3
(A–C) EL spectra at 1,000 cd m−2; current density-voltage-luminance characteristics; and power efficiency as a function of luminance for devices without out-coupling (The black circles and arrows indicate the corrsponding vertical axis for each data curves).
(D–F) EL spectra at 1,000 cd m−2; current density-voltage-luminance characteristics; and power efficiency as a function of luminance for devices with light out-coupling (The black circles and arrows indicate the corrsponding vertical axis for each data curves).
Also see Figures S5 and S7–S15, and Tables S3 and S4.
Summary of Device Performance for FIr-p-OC8-Based Blue and White Light-Emitting Devices with an EML Composed of H2: 25 wt.% and FIr-p-OC8: x wt.% Ir(Flpy-CF3)3
| Content of Ir(Flpy-CF3)3 | Von (V) | Max Performance | Device Performance at 1000/5000 cd m−2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L (cd m−2) | LE (cd A−1) | PE (lm W−1) | EQE (%) | Vd (V) | LE (cd A−1) | PE (lm W−1) | EQE (%) | CIE (x, y) at 1000 cd m−2 | ||
| x = 0 (Without out-coupling) | 2.9 | 17,655 | 37.8 | 34.2 | 19.6 | 4.1/4.7 | 34.9/27.1 | 26.9/17.5 | 18.1/14.1 | (0.15, 0.26) |
| x = 0 (With out-coupling) | 2.9 | 38,580 | 70.9 | 63.0 | 34.2 | 4.1/4.6 | 66.9/56.2 | 50.9/38.6 | 32.2/27.0 | (0.16, 0.28) |
| x = 0.4 wt.% (Without out-coupling) | 2.9 | 23,392 | 60.4 | 59.4 | 21.8 | 4.1/4.6 | 52.7/37.7 | 40.2/25.8 | 19.6/14.5 | (0.34, 0.39) |
| x = 0.4 wt.% (With out-coupling) | 2.8 | 44,177 | 120.3 | 117.5 | 42.8 | 3.9/4.3 | 110.5/85.0 | 88.7/61.9 | 41.0/32.2 | (0.36, 0.40) |
| x = 0.7 wt.% (Without out-coupling) | 2.8 | 23,085 | 69.1 | 68.5 | 23.6 | 4.1/4.6 | 59.7/43.1 | 47.0/29.8 | 20.6/15.4 | (0.43, 0.44) |
| x = 0.7 wt.% (With out-coupling) | 2.8 | 44,485 | 131.5 | 130.1 | 44.6 | 3.9/4.3 | 119.5/95.0 | 96.3/69.0 | 40.9/33.0 | (0.44, 0.44) |
Also see Figures S10 and S13, and Table S4.
Performance Comparison of the Phosphorescent WOLEDs
| Year | Reference | PE at the Maximum (lm W−1) | PE at 1,000 cd m−2 (lm W−1) | CIE (x, y) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 10.0 | – | (0.30, 0.47) | |
| 2009 | 23.4 | – | (0.38, 0.38) | |
| 2009 | 20.3 | 16.8 | (0.40, 0.45) | |
| 2011 | 37.4 | 20.7 | (0.31, 0.50) | |
| 2012 | – | 23.3 | (0.38, 0.43) | |
| 2013 | – | 22.6 | (0.35, 0.41) | |
| 2014 | 45 | 18 | (0.45, 0.42) | |
| 2015 | 41.8 | 22.8 | (0.43, 0.43) | |
| 2018 | This work | 59.4 (w/o) | 40.2 | (0.34, 0.39) |
| 2018 | This work | 68.5 (w/o) | 47 | (0.43, 0.44) |
| 2008 | – | 44 | (0.34, 0.40) | |
| 2009 | -- (w/o) | 33 | (0.45, 0.47) | |
| 2011 | 40.7 | 37.1 | (0.42, 0.44) | |
| 2013 | – | 33.8 | (0.44, 0.46) | |
| 2014 | 63.2 | 53.4 | (0.35, 0.42) | |
| 2014 | 68.8 (w/o) | 60.0 | (0.35, 0.46) | |
| 2015 | 64.9 | 49.6 | (0.35, 0.46) | |
| 2015 | 46.6 | 41.3 | (0.45, 0.44) | |
| 2017 | 105.0 | 59.5 | (0.40,0.48) | |
w/o, without out-coupling; w/-, with out-coupling.