Literature DB >> 30239903

Keel bone differences in laying hens housed in enriched colony cages.

Nicholas J Chargo1, Cara I Robison1, Hope O Akaeze2, Sydney L Baker3,4, Michael J Toscano5, Maja M Makagon3,4, Darrin M Karcher6.   

Abstract

Keel bone damage may be painful to birds and affect their production. In order to better understand the frequency, position, and timepoint of keel bone damage that occur during production, the integrity of W-36 laying hen keel bones housed in enriched colony cages at 748.4 cm2 (116 in2) was evaluated. At four time points, 120 birds (10 per cage; three cages per each of four rooms) had keel bones evaluated. Each hen was placed in a motion limiting restraint, scanned using computed tomography (CT), fitted in vests containing tri-axial accelerometers, and placed back in their cages for 21 d. After 21 d, the hens were rescanned and returned to their cages. This process was repeated after 133 d. The CT scans were imported into Mimics analysis software (Materialise, Plymouth, MI, USA); 3D models were made of each keel bone at each time point and exported to 3-matic analysis software (Materialise, Plymouth, MI, USA). Each laying hen's keel bone model was superimposed onto scans from multiple time points resulting in four bone pairings representative of each 21-d period, the 133-d period, and the entire duration of the project. Next, the proximal portion of each bone pairing was edited to normalize bone shape according to a strict protocol. Additionally, each pairing was divided into three portions: distal aspect (3 cm), proximal aspect (2 cm), and middle portion (remaining). Whole bone pairing and each bone portion was analyzed using the Part Comparison tool in 3-matic. Raw data were compiled into three datasets and analyzed in SAS 9.3 using the GLIMMIX procedure using a three-level random intercept model. The model controlled for time, part, part(time), and system with random intercepts of bird(cage) and cage. Overall, results revealed that the greatest morphological changes occurred during the first 21-d period with regards to time (P = 0.03) and in the distal aspect of the keel with regards to part (P < 0.0001).
© 2018 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; computed tomography; enriched colony; keel; laying hen

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30239903     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  3 in total

1.  Micro-computed tomography high resolution evaluation of dimensional and morphological changes of 3 root-end filling materials in simulated physiological conditions.

Authors:  Fernanda Ferrrari Esteves Torres; Reinhilde Jacobs; Mostafa EzEldeen; Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru; Bernardo Camargo Dos Santos; Éverton Lucas-Oliveira; Tito José Bonagamba; Mario Tanomaru-Filho
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens-Its Relation to Bone Mineral Density, Body Growth Rate and Laying Performance.

Authors:  Christin Habig; Martina Henning; Ulrich Baulain; Simon Jansen; Armin Manfred Scholz; Steffen Weigend
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Explanations for keel bone fractures in laying hens: are there explanations in addition to elevated egg production?

Authors:  Michael J Toscano; Ian C Dunn; Jens-Peter Christensen; Stefanie Petow; Kathe Kittelsen; Reiner Ulrich
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.