OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of virtual reality (VR) games on improving balance in different groups of neurological patients with a particular focus on the study quality and to determine the gold standard in VR training in these groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of controlled trials published between January 2009 and December 2017 was conducted. The PubMed, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, and Medline databases were searched. Studies involved patients with stroke or Parkinson's disease or children with cerebral palsy. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. The PEDro scores ranged from 4 to 8 points. Analysis of the rehabilitation programs revealed a very large discrepancy in the planned volume of exercises in different subgroups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the comparison of VR interventions between conventional rehabilitation and no intervention exhibited significantly better results. However, these results should be interpreted with great caution due to the large diversity of the systems, games, and training volume used in the VR therapy. In all included studies, only several articles included objective methods to assess the effect of VR. In addition, most of the articles showed a high risk of bias, such as a lack of randomization and blinding or a small sample size. That is why further well-designed randomized control trials are required to evaluate the influence of VR on balance in different groups of neurological patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of virtual reality (VR) games on improving balance in different groups of neurologicalpatients with a particular focus on the study quality and to determine the gold standard in VR training in these groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of controlled trials published between January 2009 and December 2017 was conducted. The PubMed, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, and Medline databases were searched. Studies involved patients with stroke or Parkinson's disease or children with cerebral palsy. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. The PEDro scores ranged from 4 to 8 points. Analysis of the rehabilitation programs revealed a very large discrepancy in the planned volume of exercises in different subgroups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the comparison of VR interventions between conventional rehabilitation and no intervention exhibited significantly better results. However, these results should be interpreted with great caution due to the large diversity of the systems, games, and training volume used in the VR therapy. In all included studies, only several articles included objective methods to assess the effect of VR. In addition, most of the articles showed a high risk of bias, such as a lack of randomization and blinding or a small sample size. That is why further well-designed randomized control trials are required to evaluate the influence of VR on balance in different groups of neurologicalpatients.
Authors: Jacek Jurkojć; Piotr Wodarski; Robert Michnik; Wojciech Marszałek; Kajetan J Słomka; Marek Gzik Journal: J Hum Kinet Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 2.193
Authors: Anna Akbaş; Wojciech Marszałek; Anna Kamieniarz; Jacek Polechoński; Kajetan J Słomka; Grzegorz Juras Journal: J Hum Kinet Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 2.193