Literature DB >> 30239140

Primary angle closure and primary angle closure glaucoma in retinal vein occlusion.

Ke Xu1, Lingling Wu1, Zhizhong Ma1, Yuling Liu1, Fang Qian1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the frequency of primary angle closure (PAC) and primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) based on a hospital population.
METHODS: A total of 375 consecutive cases newly diagnosed with RVO by fluorescein fundus angiography at a single eye centre in Peking were reviewed. Gonioscopy was performed in all patients. Glaucoma was diagnosed according to the criteria of the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology. Retinal vein occlusion was classified as central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), hemicentral retinal vein occlusion (HRVO), or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and as arteriovenous crossing RVO (AV-RVO), optic cup RVO (OC-RVO), optic nerve RVO without optical nerve head swelling (NONHS-RVO), or RVO with optical nerve head swelling (ONHS-RVO) based on the site of venous occlusion. Percentage of PAC or PACG for each type of RVO were calculated.
RESULTS: PACG had a frequency of 4.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-6.9%] in 317 RVO patients [5.3% (95% CI 2.0-11.2%) in CRVO, 8.8% (95% CI 1.9-23.7%) in HRVO, and 1.9% (95% CI 0.4-5.4%) in BRVO]. Primary angle closure (PAC) had a frequency of 2.9% (95% CI 1.4-5.5%) in RVO. PAC/PACG had a frequency of 11.5% (95% CI 6.3-18.9%) in CRVO, 8.8% (95% CI 1.9-23.7%) in HRVO and 3.1% (95% CI 1.0-7.1%) in BRVO. PAC/PACG was significantly more prevalent in NONHS-RVO [18.9% (95% CI 9.4-32.0%)] than in ONHS-RVO [6.5% (95% CI 2.1-14.5%)], AV-RVO [3.1% (95% CI 0.9-7.8%)], and OC-RVO [2.3% (95% CI 0.1-12.3%)].
CONCLUSION: The overall frequency of PAC/PACG was much higher in patients with RVO (especially CRVO) than that in the general population. Eyes with PAC/PACG may undergo mechanical changes in the lamina cribrosa of the optic disc, resulting in RVO. Angle-closure conditions should be borne in mind when investigating Chinese patients with RVO.
© 2018 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angle closure; glaucoma; retinal vein; retinal vein occlusion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30239140     DOI: 10.1111/aos.13879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  6 in total

Review 1.  Intraocular pressure modifications in patients with acute central/hemicentral retinal vein occlusions.

Authors:  Dan Călugăru; Mihai Călugăru
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Review: The Development of Risk Factors and Cytokines in Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Authors:  Yi Tang; Yan Cheng; Shuo Wang; Yongjie Wang; Pengjia Liu; Hong Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 3.  Clinical Features of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in Young Patients.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Zhang; Yi-Fan Zhong; Yan-Qi Xue; Si-Qi Li; Bing-Yu Wang; Gui-Qi Zhang; Iko Hidasa; Han Zhang
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  Patients with unilateral retinal vein occlusion show reduced radial peripapillary capillary density in their fellow eyes.

Authors:  Lingling Fan; Yazhou Zhu; Xiaomei Sun; Jinguo Yu; Hua Yan
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Mapping research trends of retinal vein occlusion from 2009 to 2018: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Fangkun Zhao; Fengkun Du; Dong Shi; Wenkai Zhou; Youhong Jiang; Liwei Ma
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  [Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on a cohort of patients with vein occlusion].

Authors:  J D García Palacios; N Puente Ruiz; J J Napal Lecumberri; J L Hernández Hernández
Journal:  Rev Clin Esp       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.