Literature DB >> 30238781

Guidelines and clinical practice at the primary level of healthcare in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without kidney disease in five European countries.

Susanne Eder1, Johannes Leierer1, Julia Kerschbaum1, Laszlo Rosivall2, Andrzej Wiecek3, Dick de Zeeuw4, Patrick B Mark5, Georg Heinze6, Peter Rossing7, Hiddo L Heerspink4, Gert Mayer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetes mellitus-associated chronic kidney disease varies considerably between countries. Next to differences in genetic as well as life style risk factors, varying practices in medical care delivery might cause this diversity.
METHOD: The PROVALID study recruited 4000 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at the primary level of healthcare in five European countries (Austria, Hungary, The Netherlands, Poland and Scotland). Baseline data were used to describe patient characteristics and compare the adherence to ADA (American Diabetes Association) and KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines with respect to metabolic and blood pressure control, use of renin-angiotensin system-blocking agents, statins and acetylsalicylic acid between the countries.
RESULTS: About 34.8% of the population had evidence of diabetes mellitus-associated chronic kidney disease. The median HbA1c level of the cohort was 6.8% (ranging from 6.5 in Poland to 7.0% in Scotland). Mean blood pressure was 136/79 (±17/10) and significantly higher in subjects with elevated albuminuria. These individuals also were more often treated with renin-angiotensin system-blocking agents (74.1% vs 84.6%), whereas the use of statins was driven by cardiovascular comorbidity. Acetylsalicylic acid was used in only 28.9% subjects. Despite similar cardiovascular comorbidities and renal function, the use of renin-angiotensin system-blocking agents varied significantly between the countries from 66.7% to 87.4%. An even higher variability was observed for patients >40 years of age using statins (39.8%-82.7%) and administration of acetylsalicylic acid in patients older than 50 years (5.2%-43.8%).
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that medical practice in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with and without renal disease is different in European countries. Longitudinal follow-up will reveal if this diversity affects clinical endpoints.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADA guideline adherence; Diabetes mellitus; KDIGO guideline adherence; diabetic kidney disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30238781     DOI: 10.1177/1479164118795559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diab Vasc Dis Res        ISSN: 1479-1641            Impact factor:   3.291


  5 in total

1.  Still Asking "Which Rate Is Right?" Years Later.

Authors:  Tyler B Woodell; Dena E Rifkin
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Association between physical activity and the utilization of general practitioners in different age groups.

Authors:  Thomas E Dorner; Julia Wilfinger; Kathryn Hoffman; Christian Lackinger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Annual and Post-Exacerbation Follow-Up of Asthma Patients in Clinical Practice - A Large Population-Based Study in Sweden.

Authors:  Hanna Sandelowsky; Björn Ställberg; Fredrik Wiklund; Gunilla Telg; Sofie de Fine Licht; Christer Janson
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2022-04-13

4.  Influence of guideline adherence and parameter control on the clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Jingru Lu; Wei Zhao; Tingyu Chen; Zhuoyang Xu; Xingzhi Sun; Honglang Xie; Yu An; Caihong Zeng; Gang Hu; Guotong Xie; Zhihong Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-07

5.  Impact of the KidneyWise toolkit on chronic kidney disease referral practices in Ontario primary care: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Kenneth Scott Brimble; Philip Boll; Allan K Grill; Amber Molnar; Danielle M Nash; Amit Garg; Ayub Akbari; Peter G Blake; David Perkins
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.