Khatia Gabisonia1, Fabio A Recchia2,3. 1. Institute of Life Sciences, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Liberta` 33, 56127, Pisa, Italy. 2. Institute of Life Sciences, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Liberta` 33, 56127, Pisa, Italy. f.recchia@santannapisa.it. 3. Cardiovascular Research Center, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. f.recchia@santannapisa.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current knowledge of pathophysiological and molecular mechanisms responsible for the genesis and development of heart failure (HF) is absolutely vast. Nonetheless, the hiatus between experimental findings and therapeutic options remains too deep, while the available pharmacological treatments are mostly seasoned and display limited efficacy. The necessity to identify new, non-pharmacological strategies to target molecular alterations led investigators, already many years ago, to propose gene therapy for HF. Here, we will review some of the strategies proposed over the past years to target major pathogenic mechanisms/factors responsible for severe cardiac injury developing into HF and will provide arguments in favor of the necessity to keep alive research on this topic. RECENT FINDINGS: After decades of preclinical research and phases of enthusiasm and disappointment, clinical trials were finally launched in recent years. The first one to reach phase II and testing gene delivery of sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase did not yield encouraging results; however, other trials are ongoing, more efficient viral vectors are being developed, and promising new potential targets have been identified. For instance, recent research is focused on gene repair, in vivo, to treat heritable forms of HF, while strong experimental evidence indicates that specific microRNAs can be delivered to post-ischemic hearts to induce regeneration, a result that was previously thought possible only by using stem cell therapy. Gene therapy for HF is aging, but exciting perspectives are still very open.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current knowledge of pathophysiological and molecular mechanisms responsible for the genesis and development of heart failure (HF) is absolutely vast. Nonetheless, the hiatus between experimental findings and therapeutic options remains too deep, while the available pharmacological treatments are mostly seasoned and display limited efficacy. The necessity to identify new, non-pharmacological strategies to target molecular alterations led investigators, already many years ago, to propose gene therapy for HF. Here, we will review some of the strategies proposed over the past years to target major pathogenic mechanisms/factors responsible for severe cardiac injury developing into HF and will provide arguments in favor of the necessity to keep alive research on this topic. RECENT FINDINGS: After decades of preclinical research and phases of enthusiasm and disappointment, clinical trials were finally launched in recent years. The first one to reach phase II and testing gene delivery of sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase did not yield encouraging results; however, other trials are ongoing, more efficient viral vectors are being developed, and promising new potential targets have been identified. For instance, recent research is focused on gene repair, in vivo, to treat heritable forms of HF, while strong experimental evidence indicates that specific microRNAs can be delivered to post-ischemic hearts to induce regeneration, a result that was previously thought possible only by using stem cell therapy. Gene therapy for HF is aging, but exciting perspectives are still very open.
Authors: Christopher E Nelson; Chady H Hakim; David G Ousterout; Pratiksha I Thakore; Eirik A Moreb; Ruth M Castellanos Rivera; Sarina Madhavan; Xiufang Pan; F Ann Ran; Winston X Yan; Aravind Asokan; Feng Zhang; Dongsheng Duan; Charles A Gersbach Journal: Science Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Patrick Most; Hanna Seifert; Erhe Gao; Hajime Funakoshi; Mirko Völkers; Jörg Heierhorst; Andrew Remppis; Sven T Pleger; Brent R DeGeorge; Andrea D Eckhart; Arthur M Feldman; Walter J Koch Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-09-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Katharine Bushby; Richard Finkel; David J Birnkrant; Laura E Case; Paula R Clemens; Linda Cripe; Ajay Kaul; Kathi Kinnett; Craig McDonald; Shree Pandya; James Poysky; Frederic Shapiro; Jean Tomezsko; Carolyn Constantin Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2009-11-27 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Aravind Asokan; Julia C Conway; Jana L Phillips; Chengwen Li; Julia Hegge; Rebecca Sinnott; Swati Yadav; Nina DiPrimio; Hyun-Joo Nam; Mavis Agbandje-McKenna; Scott McPhee; Jon Wolff; R Jude Samulski Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2009-12-27 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: David G Ousterout; Pablo Perez-Pinera; Pratiksha I Thakore; Ami M Kabadi; Matthew T Brown; Xiaoxia Qin; Olivier Fedrigo; Vincent Mouly; Jacques P Tremblay; Charles A Gersbach Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Lilian Grigorian Shamagian; Rosalinda Madonna; Doris Taylor; Andreu M Climent; Felipe Prosper; Luis Bras-Rosario; Antoni Bayes-Genis; Péter Ferdinandy; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte; Valentin Fuster; Roberto Bolli Journal: Circ Res Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Jinxi Wang; Qian Shi; Yihui Wang; Logan W Dawson; Grace Ciampa; Weiyang Zhao; Guangqin Zhang; Biyi Chen; Robert M Weiss; Chad E Grueter; Duane D Hall; Long-Sheng Song Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 23.213
Authors: Chukwuemeka G Anene-Nzelu; Mick C J Lee; Wilson L W Tan; Albert Dashi; Roger S Y Foo Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 32.419