Literature DB >> 30238377

The Romanian experience and perspective on the commercial cultivation of genetically modified crops in Europe.

Mihael Cristin Ichim1.   

Abstract

Romania was the third country in Europe and the tenth in the world, to commercially adopt genetically modified crops in 1999, only 3 years after they were first marketed globally. Half a million hectares of transgenic herbicide resistant soybean and insect resistant maize were grown in Romania during an uninterrupted 17-year period. After several years of continued declining area, the commercial cultivation of transgenic plants recently ended. The commercial cultivation of transgenic crops in Romania remains legally and technically possible, according to the EU and national regulations. However, the declining area cultivated with these crops in Romania seems to be the result of farmers' conscious decision, while waiting for more profitable genetically modified crops to become available that better fit their needs. This expectation would be a logical result of the EU GMO opt-out Directive 2015/412 and the advent of the new plant breeding techniques. The GMO opt-out mechanism is still expected to unblock the EU authorization process after the large majority of the EU member states have already prohibited the cultivation of genetically modified organisms in their territory. As the new plant breeding techniques offer significant technical and economic advantages, they could be rapidly adopted by commercial breeders and farmers outside Europe. The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that plants obtained with the new gene editing techniques must go through the same authorization procedure as transgenic plants. This decision is expected to delay the approval and availability of these new plant varieties on the EU market and their commercial cultivation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; GM crops; GMOs; Genome editing; NPBTs; Transgenic plants

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30238377     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-018-0095-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  14 in total

1.  Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops.

Authors:  Janet E Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Report claims no yield advantage for Bt crops.

Authors:  Cormac Sheridan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Bt corn in Spain--the performance of the EU's first GM crop.

Authors:  Manuel Gómez-Barbero; Julio Berbel; Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  The 2010 Eurobarometer on the life sciences.

Authors:  George Gaskell; Agnes Allansdottir; Nick Allum; Paula Castro; Yilmaz Esmer; Claude Fischler; Jonathan Jackson; Nicole Kronberger; Jurgen Hampel; Niels Mejlgaard; Alex Quintanilha; Andu Rammer; Gemma Revuelta; Sally Stares; Helge Torgersen; Wolfgang Wager
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  The assessment of field trials in GMO research around the world and their possible integration in field trials for variety registration.

Authors:  M M Slot; C C M van de Wiel; G A Kleter; R G F Visser; E J Kok
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 6.  Surge in insect resistance to transgenic crops and prospects for sustainability.

Authors:  Bruce E Tabashnik; Yves Carrière
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Correction: Sixteen Years of Bt Maize in the EU Hotspot: Why Has Resistance Not Evolved?

Authors:  Pedro Castañera; Gema P Farinós; Félix Ortego; David A Andow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Economic impact of GM crops: the global income and production effects 1996-2012.

Authors:  Graham Brookes; Peter Barfoot
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.074

9.  Impact of genetically engineered maize on agronomic, environmental and toxicological traits: a meta-analysis of 21 years of field data.

Authors:  Elisa Pellegrino; Stefano Bedini; Marco Nuti; Laura Ercoli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Biotech crop planting resumes high adoption in 2016.

Authors:  Rhodora R Aldemita; Randy A Hautea
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.074

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Various Soybean Allergen Levels in Genetically and Non-Genetically Modified Soybeans.

Authors:  Ayato Matsuo; Kaho Matsushita; Ayano Fukuzumi; Naoki Tokumasu; Erika Yano; Nobuhiro Zaima; Tatsuya Moriyama
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-04-21

2.  The more favorable attitude of the citizens toward GMOs supports a new regulatory framework in the European Union.

Authors:  Mihael Cristin Ichim
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.074

3.  CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Targeted Mutagenesis of GmUGT Enhanced Soybean Resistance Against Leaf-Chewing Insects Through Flavonoids Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Yongxing Zhang; Wei Guo; Limiao Chen; Xinjie Shen; Hongli Yang; Yisheng Fang; Wenqi Ouyang; Sihua Mai; Haifeng Chen; Shuilian Chen; Qingnan Hao; Songli Yuan; Chanjuan Zhang; Yi Huang; Zhihui Shan; Zhonglu Yang; Dezhen Qiu; Xinan Zhou; Dong Cao; Xia Li; Yongqing Jiao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.753

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.