Literature DB >> 30238038

Data on the estimating the risk of cancer due to some common radiographs in Tehran city.

Mohammad Mirdoraghi1, Amin Banaei2, Jafar Fatahi Asl3.   

Abstract

The purpose of the data is to estimate the excessive risk of cancer due to some common radiographs in Tehran. The data were collected in 8 radiology centers in Tehran city and on 283 patients with eight radiographic views. To obtain the data, PCXMC 2.0 based on Monte Carlo calculations, has been used to calculate the effective dose of each organ, and annual effective dose. The effective dose, cumulative effective dose, number of radiographs per year and excessive cancer risk due to the type of radiographs calculated. The additional risk of lethal cancer resulting from these radiographs in the target population is about 14.81 cases of the total population of Tehran city in one year.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Common radiographs; PCXMC 2.0; Radiology; Risk estimation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30238038      PMCID: PMC6143744          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table Value of the data The data show that the number of excessive cancers due to the common radiographs for the entire population of Tehran city is 14.81 cases per year. Therefore, data can be used to reduce the number of unnecessary radiographs and ultimately reduce the amount of cancer in Tehran city. The data is useful in demonstrating that the optimization of exposure factors including FOV, KVP, MAS and FSD could diminish the effective dose of patients in common radiographs. Therefore, more researches is needed to adjust the mentioned parameters to decrease the excessive risk of radiation-induced cancer in the current population. The data can be used to show that a specialist in radiation protection and radiation biology should supervise the radiology ward in order to monitor patient safety, quality control and quality assurance of radiology machines; consequently, the effective dose and the number of excessive cancers due to the common radiographs would be decreased.

Data

In Table 1, the ESD, the mean of the exposure parameters used for each type of radiography is presented.
Table 1

Exposure parameters in the common radiology procedures and ESD.

Radiology procedureMean KVPMean MASFSD (cm)ESD (mGy)
chest (Anterior-Posterior view)65201800.15
pelvic (Anterior-Posterior view)85481005.4
abdomen (Anterior-Posterior view)64441002.7
skull (Anterior-Posterior view)73171002.2
Thoracic spine (Anterior-Posterior view)76401004.6
lumbar (Anterior-Posterior view)76551005.8
lumbar spine (Lateral view)85691006.2
Thoracic spine (Lateral view)80541005.1
Exposure parameters in the common radiology procedures and ESD. Table 2 shows the effective dose, cumulative effective dose, the number of radiographs per year, and excessive risk of cancer.
Table 2

Effective dose, cumulative effective dose, number of radiographs per year, and excessive risk of cancer from each radiography in the population of Tehran city in a year.

Radiology Procedurethe annual number of X-ray examinations per 1000 populationNumber of radiographs in the total populationThe average effective doseAccumulative effective dose (Man-Sievert)The number of excessive cancers for the entire population of Tehran in one year
Chest90.12784,1720.02821.951.09
abdomen (Anterior-Posterior view)11.2898,0650.8785.34.26
pelvic (Anterior-Posterior view)14.91129,6230.6179.073.95
lumbar spine24.9216,4730.38583.344.167
skull25.77224,0360.0511.200.56
Thoracic spine7.6166,1590.2415.870.79
Effective dose, cumulative effective dose, number of radiographs per year, and excessive risk of cancer from each radiography in the population of Tehran city in a year.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Data collection

Data were collected on the 283 patients (65% male, 35% female) in eight common radiographs including, chest (Anterior-Posterior view), pelvic (Anterior-Posterior view), abdomen (Anterior-Posterior view), skull (Anterior-Posterior view), thoracic spine (Anterior-Posterior view), Thoracic spine (Lateral view), lumbar spine (Anterior-Posterior view), lumbar spine (Lateral view). At first, the accuracy tests of measuring half layer absorption, the accuracy of voltage of X-ray tube, time, Milliampere-seconds (mAs) were performed using Barracuda dosimeter (Multi-Purpose Detector). Then, the output of the X-ray machine was recorded at a distance of 100 cm and a voltage of 80 kV for 3 times in order to decrease the potential error. Also, all radiation parameters (voltage of tube, milliampere-seconds, focus to skin distance (FSD), filter thickness, field-of-view size (FOV) were recorded for all patients. To estimate Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) of the patients, the following equation used [1], [2]. A=The output of tube at a KV of 80 at 1 m distance from X-ray tube. B=Correction factor based on IAEA report no. 457. MAs=Milliampere-seconds applied. FSD=focus to skin distance (cm).

Calculating the effective dose

In order to estimate the annual effective dose and effective doses of organs the radiation parameters i.e. KV, MA-S, FSD, filter thickness, FOV entered in the PCXMC 2.0 software, manufactured by STUK–Radiation and Nuclear Authority, Helsinki, Finland.

Risk assessment

In order to estimate the excessive risk of radiation-induced cancer, the cumulative dose of the study population is required. The number of radiographs per year in the current society was extracted from previous studies [3], [4], [5]. Data on the cumulative effective dose for eight radiographs using of scientific relationships based on the acceptance of linear no-threshold model were obtained. Then, the risk of excessive cancer for each radiography was determined by standard equations [6], [7]. The population of Tehran city is around 8,693,706 by the 2016 census [8]. Assuming that the frequency of radiographs in Tehran city is equal to the radiographic frequency in the country [9], the annual cumulative effective dose can be calculated for a specific radiography. Consequently, according to the following formula, the excessive risk of lethal cancer is obtained per 100,000 people [10], [11].

Conflict of interest

None to declare.
Subject areaRadiation protection and radiation biology.
More specific subject areaCalculating the risk of cancer due to some common radiographs in Tehran city.
Type of dataTables
How data was acquiredThe data on the cumulative effective dose of the population was calculated by PCXMC 2.0 software, and then the excessive risk of cancer was determined by standard equations.
Data formatRaw, Analyzed.
Experimental factorsThe cumulative effective dose of the population was analyzed according to the equations for the excessive risk of radiation-induced cancer.
Experimental featuresThe excessive risk of radiation-induced cancer was determined.
Data source locationRadiology wards in educational hospitals affiliated to AJA university, Tehran province, Iran.
Data accessibilityThe data are available with this article.
  5 in total

Review 1.  The Birth of the Illegitimate Linear No-Threshold Model: An Invalid Paradigm for Estimating Risk Following Low-dose Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Jeffry A Siegel; Charles W Pennington; Bill Sacks; James S Welsh
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.339

2.  Cumulative effective dose and cancer risk for pediatric population in repetitive full spine follow-up imaging: How micro dose is the EOS microdose protocol?

Authors:  Martin Law; Wang-Kei Ma; Damian Lau; Kenneth Cheung; Janice Ip; Lawrance Yip; Wendy Lam
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Cancer Death Risk Related to Radiation Exposure from Computed Tomography Scanning Among Testicular Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Eeva Salminen; Hannele Niiniviita; Hannu Järvinen; Sirpa Heinävaara
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Doses to patients in some routine diagnostic X-ray examinations in Iran: proposed the first Iranian diagnostic reference levels.

Authors:  Mohsen Asadinezhad; Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni Toossi
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Data on excessive risk of cancer from gamma radiation in residents of Bojnurd city.

Authors:  Mohsen Khosroabadi; Seyed Abolghasem Haeri; Homa Rezaei Moghaddam; Mohammad Mirdoraghi
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-10-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.