Literature DB >> 30238025

A survey of sequences of KT-HAK-KUP transporters in green algae and basal land plants.

Guillermo E Santa María1, Sonia Oliferuk1, Jorge I Moriconi1.   

Abstract

In this data article, information is provided on sequences of KT-HAK-KUP transporters from green algae and basal land plants. A data set is offered containing sequences corresponding to the chlorophyte algae Chlamydomonas eustigma, Gonium pectorale and Coccomyxa subellipsoidea, the charophyte algae Coleochaete orbicularis and Klebsormidium flaccidum, the bryophyte Sphagnum fallax, the marchantophyte Marchantia polymorpha and the gymnosperm Pinus taeda, which have been not formerly analyzed. In addition, an analysis of similarity scores among representatives of the clusters recognized in photosynthetic green organisms (namely, chlorophyte algae, charophyte algae, basal embryophytes and higher embryophytes) is performed as well as an analysis of membrane topology for them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algae; HAK; KT; KUP; Transporter

Year:  2018        PMID: 30238025      PMCID: PMC6144887          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data Data presented correspond to sequences of KT-HAK-KUP transporters retrieved from public databases which have been not formerly analyzed for the organisms Coccomyxa subellipsoidea, Chlamydomonas eustigma, Gonium pectorale, Sphagnum fallax, Marchantia polymorpha, Pinus taeda, Coleochaete orbicularis and Klebsormidium flaccidum and a new sequence for Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The data set is complemented with sequences already examined for Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Physcomitrella patients, Selaginella moellendorffii, Picea abies, Amborella trichopoda, Arabidopsis thaliana, Prunus persica, Oryza sativa and Zea mays. These sequences can be used to build up phylogenetic trees and to perform complementary analyses based on them. In this data article, they have been used to analyze the similarity scores in pair comparisons among members of different KT-HAK-KUP clades as well as to predict their possible topology.

Data

Data introduced correspond to new KT-HAK-KUP sequences derived from public databases and the analysis performed for them. The description of the sources for all the sequences used for Coccomyxa subellipsoidea, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlamydomonas eustigma, Gonium pectorale, Sphagnum fallax, Marchantia polymorpha, Pinus taeda, Coleochaete orbicularis and Klebsormidium flaccidum is provided in Table 1, while the corresponding sequences are provided in the accompanying data set (Appendix A. Supplementary material, Table, mentioned as Table 6 in reference [1]). The data set also contains the KT-HAK-KUP sequences already posted by Nieves-Cordones et al. [2] for Physcomitrella patients, Selaginella moellendorffii, Picea abies, Amborella trichopoda, Arabidopsis thaliana, Prunus persica, Oryza sativa and Zea mays (Supplementary material Table), which have been used to construct a phylogenetic tree of KT-HAK-KUPs in green algae and land plants [1]. The data set includes only full length sequences that contain a region with homology to the first putative first transmembrane domain as well as the highly conserved GGT(A/L/I/P/S)F(L/A)A(S)L(V/I/M/A)YS(T/A) motif as determined following their alignment with MAFFT. An alignment of chlorophyte and charophyte algae sequences together with those corresponding to Arabidopsis thaliana is provided (Appendix A. Supplementary material, Fig. 1). Percent similarity scores among representatives of KT-HAK-KUPs corresponding to the 12 clades identified in green photosynthetic organisms were estimated (Table 2). In the same way percent similarity scores among the members identified in each green algal clade are shown (Table 3). The capacity of four topology prediction services to generate satisfactory topological models for the bacterial KUP transporter, for which the topology has been experimentally determined [3], is summarized in Appendix A. Supplementary material, Fig. 2. It was found that all the services (TOPCONS, TOPCONS-single, THMHH 2.0 and TMPred) provided an accurate agreement with the topology of KUP. Therefore, these four services were used to analyze the number and orientation of transmembrane domains in selected members of the above mentioned clades of green photosynthetic organisms. The predicted molecular weights of these representative KT-HAK-KUP transporters are given along with a prediction of the number of transmembrane domains derived from the use of the four topology prediction services (Table 4). In Table 5 a more detailed analysis of the residues involved in each transmembrane domain is provided for canonical members of the KT-HAK-KUP family of transporters, namely HvHAK1, AtHAK5, AtKUP4(TRH1) and AtKUP7.
Table 1

List of sequences retrieved from data-bases, indicating their accession number and source. Sequences are provided in Supplementary Table.

OrganismIdentificationRetrieved fromNamePrevious description
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiCre17.g714200.t1.1PhytozomeCrHAK1He et al. [4]
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiCre17.g714450.t1.2PhytozomeCrHAK2He et al. [4]
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiCre17.g714150.t1.1PhytozomeCrHAK3He et al. [4]
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiCre04.g217350.t1.2PhytozomeCrHAK4He et al. [4]
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiCre04.g214657.t1.1PhytozomeCrHAK5None
Chlamydomonas eustigmaGAX79004.1NCBICeuHAK1None
Chlamydomonas eustigmaGAX81809.1NCBICeuHAK2None
Chlamydomonas eustigmaGAX85040.1NCBICeuHAK3None
Coccomyxa subellipsoidea C-16946832 PrimaryPhytozomeCosubHAK2None
Gonium pectoraleKXZ41691.1NCBIGpHAK1None
Klebsormidium flaccidumkfl00150_0260_v1.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseKflHAK1None
Klebsormidium flaccidumkfl00335_0050_v1.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseKflHAK2None
Klebsormidium flaccidumkfl00663_0030_v1.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseKflHAK3None
Klebsormidium flaccidumkfl00971_0030_v1.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseKflHAK4None
Klebsormidium flaccidumkfl00236_0145_v1.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseKflHAK5None
Coleochaete orbicularisGBSL01056787.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseColorbHAK1None
Coleochaete orbicularisGBSL01029532.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseColorbHAK2None
Coleochaete orbicularisGBSL01029531.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseColorbHAK3None
Coleochaete orbicularisGBSL01051607.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseColorbHAK4None
Coleochaete orbicularisGBSL01046951.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseColorbHAK5None
Coleochaete orbicularisGBSL01051393.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseColorbHAK6None
Coleochaete orbicularisGBSL01030503.1Transcriptome shotgun assembly databaseColorbHAK7None
Marchantia polymorphaMapoly0070s0079.1PhytozomeMapolHAK1None
Marchantia polymorphaMapoly0076s0088.1PhytozomeMapolHAK2None
Marchantia polymorphaMapoly0011s0118.1PhytozomeMapolHAK3None
Marchantia polymorphaMapoly0046s0054.1PhytozomeMapolHAK4None
Marchantia polymorphaMapoly0317s0002.1PhytozomeMapolHAK5None
Marchantia polymorphaMapoly0045s0071.1PhytozomeMapolHAK6None
Marchantia polymorphaMapoly0014s0103.1PhytozomeMapolHAK7None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0105s0022.1PhytozomeSphfalHAK1None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0153s0001.1PhytozomeSphfalHAK2None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0008s0191.1PhytozomeSphfalHAK3None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0147s0026.1PhytozomeSphfalHAK4None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0017s0013.1PhytozomeSphfalHAK5None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0076s0081.2PhytozomeSphfalHAK6None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0162s0051.1PhytozomeSphfalHAK7None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0100s0051.1PhytozomeSphfalHAK8None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0001s0210.1PhytozomeSphfalHAK9None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0045s0071.1PhytozomeSphfalHAK10None
Sphagnum fallaxSphfalx0049s0008.1PhytozomeSphfalHAK12None
Pinus Taedalcl|PITA_000007335CongeniePtHAK1None
Pinus Taedalcl|PITA_000007338CongeniePtHAK2None
Pinus Taedalcl|PITA_000021914CongeniePtHAK3None
Pinus Taedalcl|PITA_000022279CongeniePtHAK4None
Pinus Taedalcl|PITA_000005025CongeniePtHAK5None
Pinus Taedalcl|PITA_000022280CongeniePtHAK6None
Pinus Taedalcl|PITA_000092317CongeniePtHAK7None

As stated, the remaining sequences used were retrieved from Nieves-Cordones et al. [2].

Subject areaPlant Biology
More specific subject areaPlant ion transport, transporter phylogeny
Type of dataProtein sequences retrieved from public databases, analysis of similarity and topological models
How data was acquiredRetrieved from public databases and further bioinformatic analysis
Data formatRaw data in fasta (for sequence data set), analyzed data (Tables and Figures)
Experimental factorsNo applicable
Experimental featuresNo applicable
Data source locationChascomús, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Data accessibilityThe data are available within this article
Related articleKT-HAK-KUP transporters in major terrestrial photosynthetic organisms: a twenty years tale[1]
Table 2

Percent similarity scores, as determined by pair comparisons at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/psa/emboss_needle/, among selected transporters corresponding to clusters of KT-HAK-KUPs in photosynthetic green organisms. Clusters I to VI correspond to Embryophyta while clusters VII to XII correspond to Chlorophyta and Charophyta (Klebsormidiophyceae + Coleochaetophyceae). Taken in consideration the apparent diversity, Clusters II and XII are represented by three and two transporters, respectively.

ClusterIII bII cII aIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXXIXII a
TransporterAtHAK5AtKUP1AtKUP2AtKUP4AtKUP10PpHAK13AtKUP7PpHAK6ColorbHAK7KfHAK3KfHAK2ColorbHAK1KfHAK4CrHAK1
IAtHAK5
II bAtKUP159.6
II cAtKUP258.667
II aAtKUP45664.865.8
IIIAtKUP1061.763.562.158.9
IVPpHAK1354.752.849.648.651.2
VAtKUP758.354.155.152.760.352.3
VIPpHAK662.162.459.557.460.551.856.1
VIIColorbHAK73734.53833.237.835.535.238
VIIIKflHAK350.948.850.447.950.847.949.649.839.4
IXKflHAK247.849.146.445.147.845.446.148.233.748.5
XColorbHAK153.951.749.149.849.445.445.649.933.845.844.4
XIKflHAK448.847.549.65148.144.147.646.537.548.645.848.2
XII aCrHAK134.63335.734.131.628.933.635.331.53834.236.138.7
XII bCeuHAK237.836.637.23638.235.134.538.828.238.336.537.138.244.3
Table 3

Similarity scores (as %) within green algae clusters of KT-HAK-KUP transporters, determined as described in Table 2.

Group VIII
KflHAK3KflHAK5
KflHAK3
KflHAK554.7
Group IX
KflHAK2ColorbHAK4ColorbHAK5
KflHAK2
ColorbHAK461.4
ColorbHAK559.789.1
Group X
KflHAL1ColorbHAK1ColorbHAK2ColorbHAK3
KflHAL1
ColorbHAK151.4
ColorbHAK258.649.8
ColorbHAK35749.683.6
Group XI
KflHAK4ColorbHAK6CosubHAK2
KflHAK4
ColorbHAK657.5
CosubHAK260.656.1
Group XII
CrHAK1CrHAK2CrHAK3CrHAK4CrHAK5CeuHAK1CeuHAK2CeuHAK3GpHAK1
CrHAK1
CrHAK296.1
CrHAK395.895.3
CrHAK492.492.891.4
CrHAK536.837.836.737.2
CeuHAK145.345.745.64531.7
CeuHAK244.343.542.743.534.849.8
CeuHAK342.942.943.142.627.35162-
GpHAK15453.554.754.233.549.446.548.2
Table 4

Predicted topology for selected members of clades of KT-HAK-KUP transporters in green photosynthetic organisms. The number of residues of each protein, its predicted molecular weight (MW), the possible number of transmembrane domains (TMs), their putative orientation as predicted with four services (TOPCONS, TOPCONS-single, TMHMM 2.0 and TMPred) as well as the predicted number of amino acidic residues potentially situated between the TM II and TM III (as predicted with TMPred) are shown.

ClusterProteinResiduesPredicted MW (kD)Number TMs/ orientation
Residues between TMII and TMIII
TOPCONSTOPCONS-singleTMHMM 2.0TMPred(TMPred)
IAtHAK578587.86i12ii12io12oi13o67
II aAtKUP477586.85i14ii12ii14ii14i73
II bAtKUP279488.64i14ii12ii12ii14i66
II cAtKUP171279.14i14ii12ii13oi13o71
IIIAtKUP1079689.23i14ii13oi11oi14i66
IVPpHAK1379888.58i12ii12ii12ii13o75
VAtKUP785895.36i14ii12ii12ii12i67
VIPpHAK676885.2i14ii12ii11oi14i67
VIICoeloHAK7995108.74i14ii10io8oo11i71
VIIIKflHAK389597.56i13oi12ii11oi13o64
IXCoeloHAK572479.03i12ii12io10oi11o68
XIKflHAK489799.66i12ii12ii12ii12i73
XColorbHAK181189.25NCi10ii11oi12i66
XII aCrHAK11264131.01i13oi12ii11oi15o143
XII bCeuHAK21187127.25i13oi12ii11oi11o154

TOPCONS generates a consensus topology derived from that obtained through the use of OCTOPUS, Philius, PolyPhobius, Scampi and SPOCTOPUS.

TOPCONS-single generates a consensus topology derived from that obtained through the use of Scampi-seq, Stmhmm, Hmmtop and Memsat.

NC: no consensus prediction (The PolyPhobius algorithm does not predict TM regions).

It was observed that this algorithm does not predict TM regions for several algae KT-HAK-KUPs.

Table 5

Predicted position of putative transmembrane domains in AtHAK5, HvHAK1, AtKUP7 and AtKUP4 for which considerable structural information is available [1]. Prediction models used were TOPCONS, TOPCONS-single, TMHMM 2.0 and TMpred. Columns inform on the residue number included in the predicted transmembrane domains.

Transmembrane Domain
TransporterServiceIIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXXIXIIXIIIXIV

AtHAK5TOPCONS5592183220248297328371420451477506nonenone
75115203240268317348391440471497526
TOPCONS-single6698185219248297325373420452478506nonenone
86118205239268317345393440472498526
TMHMM 2.06196185220249297326369420451477506nonenone
83118207239271316348391439473499528
TMPred5597185220251296328368425452475507566none
82117203239271316350388443473495529593
HvHAK1TOPCONS4282172211240287319361411442468497nonenone
62102192231260307339381431462488517
TOPCONS-single4885172210241289319364411443470496nonenone
68105192230261309339384431463490516
TMHMM 2.04883173216245288317360411440467496nonenone
70105195235267307339382433462489518
TMPred4284172211242287319359416438468497nonenone
60104192230263307340392434464485517
AtKUP7TOPCONS101142232271300348377419471502528557607629
121162252291320368397439491522548577627649
TOPCONS-single105143233271299348379413471506536556nonenone
125163253291319368399433491526550576
TMHMM 2.0105142233275300345379411475502529556nonenone
127164255293322367401433497524551578
TMPred105141232275301344377410470none526556none628
127164250296322367395434494546573644
AtKUP4TOPCONS1151141179206255285329378410436464504537
3171161199226275305349398430456484524557
TOPCONS-single1251141178207255287330378405436465nonenone
3271161198227275307350398425456485
TMHMM 2.01254144181207256285327375407436465504541
3476166198229278307349397429455484526560
TMPred852142181206253280326378405436465498540
3468160198229275302349399432455482518561
List of sequences retrieved from data-bases, indicating their accession number and source. Sequences are provided in Supplementary Table. As stated, the remaining sequences used were retrieved from Nieves-Cordones et al. [2]. Percent similarity scores, as determined by pair comparisons at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/psa/emboss_needle/, among selected transporters corresponding to clusters of KT-HAK-KUPs in photosynthetic green organisms. Clusters I to VI correspond to Embryophyta while clusters VII to XII correspond to Chlorophyta and Charophyta (Klebsormidiophyceae + Coleochaetophyceae). Taken in consideration the apparent diversity, Clusters II and XII are represented by three and two transporters, respectively. Similarity scores (as %) within green algae clusters of KT-HAK-KUP transporters, determined as described in Table 2. Predicted topology for selected members of clades of KT-HAK-KUP transporters in green photosynthetic organisms. The number of residues of each protein, its predicted molecular weight (MW), the possible number of transmembrane domains (TMs), their putative orientation as predicted with four services (TOPCONS, TOPCONS-single, TMHMM 2.0 and TMPred) as well as the predicted number of amino acidic residues potentially situated between the TM II and TM III (as predicted with TMPred) are shown. TOPCONS generates a consensus topology derived from that obtained through the use of OCTOPUS, Philius, PolyPhobius, Scampi and SPOCTOPUS. TOPCONS-single generates a consensus topology derived from that obtained through the use of Scampi-seq, Stmhmm, Hmmtop and Memsat. NC: no consensus prediction (The PolyPhobius algorithm does not predict TM regions). It was observed that this algorithm does not predict TM regions for several algae KT-HAK-KUPs. Predicted position of putative transmembrane domains in AtHAK5, HvHAK1, AtKUP7 and AtKUP4 for which considerable structural information is available [1]. Prediction models used were TOPCONS, TOPCONS-single, TMHMM 2.0 and TMpred. Columns inform on the residue number included in the predicted transmembrane domains.

Experimental design, materials, and methods description

Sequences corresponding to the chlorophytes C. reinhardtii and C. subellipsoidea, identified by performing Blast, were retrieved from Phytozome 12. It was also the source for sequences corresponding to the bryophyte S. fallax and to the marchantophyte M. polymorpha. Sequences from the gymnosperm P. taeda were retrieved from Congenie.org. In turn, sequences from the charophyte algae C. orbicularis and K. flaccidum were retrieved by performing Blast on the transcriptome shotgun assembly database. Sequences form C. eustigma and Gonium pectorale were retrieved from NCBI. The remaining sequences corresponding to the moss Physcomitrella patients, the lycopodiophyte S. moellendorffii, the gymnosperm P. abies, the basal angiosperm A. trichopoda, the dicots A. thaliana and P. persica and the monocots O. sativa and Z. mays were obtained from Nieves-Cordones et al. [2]. Sequences for C. reinhardtii were denoted as proposed by He et al. [4], being an additional sequence retrieved from Phytozome 12. Following retrieval of sequences a phylogenetic tree was built up, being 6 clades recognized in embryophytes and 6 corresponding to chlorophyte and charophyte algae [1]. A subset containing only green algae sequences and those of A. thaliana were aligned. The multiple alignment was generated with the MAFFT program (version 7) at https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/index.html. Pair comparisons of similarity among representatives of the 12 clades, and subgroups of clades II and XII, were performed at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/psa/emboss_needle/. In order to advance on the structure of these putative transporters four services for the prediction of transmembrane domains were used to predict the transmembrane domains of KUP (TOPCONS, TOPCONS-single, THMHH 2.0 and TMPred). These prediction services were next used to analyze the possible topology of potential representatives of the above mentioned clades of green photosynthetic organisms.
  4 in total

Review 1.  KT-HAK-KUP transporters in major terrestrial photosynthetic organisms: A twenty years tale.

Authors:  Guillermo E Santa-María; Sonia Oliferuk; Jorge I Moriconi
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.549

2.  Defining membrane spanning domains and crucial membrane-localized acidic amino acid residues for K⁺ transport of a Kup/HAK/KT-type Escherichia coli potassium transporter.

Authors:  Yoko Sato; Kei Nanatani; Shin Hamamoto; Makoto Shimizu; Miho Takahashi; Mayumi Tabuchi-Kobayashi; Akifumi Mizutani; Julian I Schroeder; Satoshi Souma; Nobuyuki Uozumi
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.387

3.  Uneven HAK/KUP/KT Protein Diversity Among Angiosperms: Species Distribution and Perspectives.

Authors:  Manuel Nieves-Cordones; Reyes Ródenas; Alain Chavanieu; Rosa M Rivero; Vicente Martinez; Isabelle Gaillard; Francisco Rubio
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Genome-wide and molecular evolution analysis of the Poplar KT/HAK/KUP potassium transporter gene family.

Authors:  Caiyun He; Kai Cui; Aiguo Duan; Yanfei Zeng; Jianguo Zhang
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  A HAK family Na+ transporter confers natural variation of salt tolerance in maize.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Xiaoyan Liang; Limin Wang; Yibo Cao; Weibin Song; Junpeng Shi; Jinsheng Lai; Caifu Jiang
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 15.793

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.