| Literature DB >> 30237782 |
Thomas Lillicrap1, Carlos Garcia-Esperon1, Frederick Rohan Walker2, Lin Kooi Ong2, Michael Nilsson2, Neil Spratt1,2, Christopher R Levi1,2, Mark Parsons1,2, Jörgen Isgaard2,3, Andrew Bivard1,2.
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of pituitary dysfunction after severe ischemic stroke is unknown, however given the increasing attention to pituitary dysfunction after neurological injuries such as traumatic brain injury, this may represent a novel area of research in stroke.Entities:
Keywords: cognition; growth hormone; ischemic stroke; neuro recovery; rehabilitation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30237782 PMCID: PMC6135914 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00713
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Individual patient data from the study.
| 1 | 75–80 | 28.8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | R POCI | 8 | 0 | 4 | Rehabilitation | 1 |
| 2 | 75–80 | 24.6 | 8 | 10 | 3 | R MCA | 22 | 0 | 1 | Home | 1 |
| 3 | 75–80 | 25.5 | 9 | 16 | 17 | R MCA | 95 | 0 | 5 | Rehabilitation | 4 |
| 4 | 70–75 | 30.5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | R MCA | 73 | 0 | 4 | Rehabilitation | 3 |
| 5 | 70–75 | 27.1 | 4 | 10 | 10 | R MCA | 63 | 0 | 5 | Rehabilitation | 2 |
| 6 | 65–70 | 20.5 | 6 | 18 | 2 | R MCA | 82 | 0 | 4 | Home | 1 |
| 7 | 50–55 | 31 | 9 | 2 | 1 | Bilat Cerebellum | 67 | 0 | 3 | Rehabilitation | 3 |
| 8 | 65–70 | 27 | 7 | 26 | 23 | L ICA, MCA | 51 (HT1) | 0 | 4 | Rehabilitation | 3 |
| 9 | 75–80 | 40.6 | 9 | 2 | 2 | Bilat Cerebellum | 12 | 1 | 4 | Rehabilitation | 2 |
| 10 | 75–80 | 31.1 | 4 | 20 | 3 | R MCA | 92 | 0 | 4 | Rehabilitation | 3 |
| 11 | 70–75 | 23.2 | 10 | 2 | 2 | R POCI | 18 | 1 | 1 | Home | 1 |
| 12 | 55–60 | 26.0 | 10 | 2 | 1 | L LAC | 19 | 0 | 1 | Home | 1 |
| 13 | 75–80 | 22.0 | 6 | 20 | 7 | R MCA | 90 (HT1) | 0 | 3 | Rehabilitation | 2 |
Pituitary function results from the study.
| 1 | 4.16 | 28.8 | Yes | 115 | 249 | 2.7 | 1.57 | 13.2 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 8.6 |
| 2 | 36.30 | 24.6 | No | 191 | 328 | 13.3 | 0.7 | 12.5 | 4 | 3.3 | 1.3 |
| 3 | 4.70 | 25.5 | Yes | 108 | 350 | 2.3 | 1.05 | 17.5 | 3.7 | 6.4 | 1.5 |
| 4 | 2.10 | 30.5 | Yes | 56 | 472 | 2.7 | 0.91 | 13.1 | 4.4 | 13.4 | 5.2 |
| 5 | 7.90 | 27.1 | Borderline | 149 | 421 | 57.6 | 2.16 | 17 | 2 | N/A | 3.2 |
| 6 | 40.00 | 20.5 | No | 202 | 511 | 76.4 | 1.08 | 13.4 | 3.6 | N/A | 27.5 |
| 7 | 4.53 | 31 | Yes | 178 | 470 | 77.8 | 2.6 | 12 | 3.4 | N/A | 27.3 |
| 8 | 1.60 | 27 | Yes | 158 | 433 | 1.6 | 2.47 | 13 | 2.7 | 7 | 0.6 |
| 9 | 26.73 | 40.6 | No | 201 | 238 | 55.8 | 2.25 | 10.9 | 1.8 | N/A | 24.2 |
| 10 | 18.03 | 31.1 | No | 126 | 278 | 36.8 | 3.89 | 12.6 | 4.5 | N/A | 14.9 |
| 11 | 9.93 | 23.2 | Yes | 60 | 404 | 39.9 | 1.41 | 12.2 | 5.1 | 12.2 | 13.1 |
| 12 | 6.97 | 26.0 | Borderline | 125 | 358 | 1.3 | 2.22 | 11.4 | 4.2 | 0.8 | < 0.2 |
| 13 | 3.40 | 22.0 | Yes | 51 | 488 | 12.8 | 3.53 | 11 | 2.4 | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Red indicates the results which are outside of the normal reference ranges and yellow indicates borderline results.