Cynthia L Bianco1. 1. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Department of Psychiatry Research, 2 Pillsbury St, Suite 401, Concord, NH 03301, United States. Electronic address: Cynthia.Bianco@dartmouth.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (e-cig) use has increased dramatically over the past decade, rates of e-cig use among those with a chronic mental illness has largely been unexplored. Exploring this relationship for adults with a mental illness is necessary when examining the health needs of this population. METHODS: Data from the 2016 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was used to explore associations between e-cig use and chronic mental illness. E-cig use was explored in two different contexts, having tried an e-cig at least once and current e-cig use. Chronic mental illness was categorized as depression, anxiety, emotional disorder, or ADD, bipolar, schizophrenia, other disorder. RESULTS: Rates of ever trying an e-cig and current e-cig use were higher among those with a chronic mental illness. Complex logistic regressions suggested having a chronic mental illness significantly increases the likelihood of both trying an e-cig and being an e-cig user. CONCLUSIONS: Increased likelihood of e-cig use in chronic mental illness supports previous findings. This may be due to perceptions that e-cigs are less harmful and they provide ways of socially connecting with others. IMPLICATIONS: Current knowledge surrounding e-cig use in this population is lacking. The 2016 NHIS allows for a nationally representative prediction of e-cig use in this population. This data is relevant in monitoring potential harm caused by e-cigs, in addition it may be helpful when assessing the value of e-cigs as a smoking cessation tool for those with a mental illness.
INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (e-cig) use has increased dramatically over the past decade, rates of e-cig use among those with a chronic mental illness has largely been unexplored. Exploring this relationship for adults with a mental illness is necessary when examining the health needs of this population. METHODS: Data from the 2016 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was used to explore associations between e-cig use and chronic mental illness. E-cig use was explored in two different contexts, having tried an e-cig at least once and current e-cig use. Chronic mental illness was categorized as depression, anxiety, emotional disorder, or ADD, bipolar, schizophrenia, other disorder. RESULTS: Rates of ever trying an e-cig and current e-cig use were higher among those with a chronic mental illness. Complex logistic regressions suggested having a chronic mental illness significantly increases the likelihood of both trying an e-cig and being an e-cig user. CONCLUSIONS: Increased likelihood of e-cig use in chronic mental illness supports previous findings. This may be due to perceptions that e-cigs are less harmful and they provide ways of socially connecting with others. IMPLICATIONS: Current knowledge surrounding e-cig use in this population is lacking. The 2016 NHIS allows for a nationally representative prediction of e-cig use in this population. This data is relevant in monitoring potential harm caused by e-cigs, in addition it may be helpful when assessing the value of e-cigs as a smoking cessation tool for those with a mental illness.
Authors: Stephen R Baldassarri; David A Fiellin; Mary Ellen Savage; Lynn M Madden; Mark Beitel; Lara K Dhingra; Lisa Fucito; Deepa Camenga; Pooja Bollampally; Declan T Barry Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kayla Rae Farrell; Michael Weitzman; Emma Karey; Teresa K Y Lai; Terry Gordon; Shu Xu Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Nkiruka C Atuegwu; Mark D Litt; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Reinhard C Laubenbacher; Mario F Perez; Eric M Mortensen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Choon-Young Kim; Yu-Jin Paek; Hong Gwan Seo; Yoo Seock Cheong; Cheol Min Lee; Sang Min Park; Da Won Park; Kiheon Lee Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 4.379