Literature DB >> 30236253

Adoption of Lung Protective ventilation IN patients undergoing Emergency laparotomy: the ALPINE study. A prospective multicentre observational study.

X Watson1, M Chereshneva2, P M Odor3, I Chis Ster4, M Cecconi5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with a high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The primary aim of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing emergency laparotomy are ventilated using a lung-protective ventilation strategy employing tidal volume ≤8 ml kg-1 ideal body weight-1, PEEP >5 cm H2O, and recruitment manoeuvres. The secondary aim was to investigate the association between ventilation factors (lung-protective ventilation strategy, intraoperative FiO2, and peak inspiratory pressure) and the occurrence of PPCs.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively in 28 hospitals across London as part of routine National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA). Patients were followed for 7 days. Complications were defined according to the European Perioperative Clinical Outcome definition.
RESULTS: Data were collected from 568 patients. The median [inter-quartile range (IQR)] tidal volume observed was 500 ml (450-540 ml), corresponding to a median tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1 ideal body weight-1 (IQR: 7.2-9.1 ml). A lung-protective ventilation strategy was employed in 4.9% (28/568) of patients, and was not protective against the occurrence of PPCs in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio=1.06; P=0.69). Peak inspiratory pressure of <30 cm H2O was protective against development of PPCs (hazard ratio=0.46; confidence interval: 0.30-0.72; P=0.001). Median FiO2 was 0.5 (IQR: 0.44-0.53), and an increase in FiO2 by 5% increased the risk of developing a PPC by 8% (2.6-14.1%; P=0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Both intraoperative peak inspiratory pressure and FiO2 are independent factors significantly associated with development of a postoperative pulmonary complication in emergency laparotomy patients. Further studies are required to identify causality and to demonstrate if their manipulation could lead to better clinical outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anesthesia, general; lung-protective ventilation; postoperative pulmonary complications; ventilation, mechanical

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30236253     DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  2 in total

1.  Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure titration on respiration and circulation in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery in prone position under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Meijuan Qian; Fen Yang; Lihong Zhao; Jun Shen; Yang Xie
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Perioperative interventions for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter M Odor; Sohail Bampoe; David Gilhooly; Benedict Creagh-Brown; S Ramani Moonesinghe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-03-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.