Literature DB >> 30236238

Sugammadex hypersensitivity and underlying mechanisms: a randomised study of healthy non-anaesthetised volunteers.

P-J de Kam1, H Nolte1, S Good1, M Yunan1, D E Williams-Herman1, J Burggraaf2, C Kluft3, N F Adkinson4, C Cullen1, P S Skov5, J H Levy6, D J van den Dobbelsteen7, E L G M van Heumen7, F C M van Meel7, D Glassner1, T Woo1, K C Min8, P A M Peeters7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated potential for hypersensitivity reactions after repeated sugammadex administration and explored the mechanism of hypersensitivity.
METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT00988065), 448 healthy volunteers were randomised to one of three arms to receive three repeat i.v. administrations of either sugammadex 4 mg kg-1, 16 mg kg-1, or placebo. Primary endpoint was percentage of subjects with hypersensitivity (assessed by an independent adjudication committee). Secondary endpoint of anaphylaxis was classified per Sampson and Brighton criteria. Exploratory endpoints included skin testing, serum tryptase, anti-sugammadex antibodies [immunoglobulin (Ig) E/IgG], and other immunologic parameters.
RESULTS: Hypersensitivity was adjudicated for 1/148 (0.7%), 7/150 (4.7%), and 0/150 (0.0%) subjects after sugammadex 4 mg kg-1, 16 mg kg-1, and placebo, respectively. After sugammadex 16 mg kg-1, one subject met Sampson criterion 1 and Brighton level 1 (highest certainty) anaphylaxis criteria; two met Brighton level 2 criteria. After database lock it was determined that certain protocol deviations could have introduced bias in the reporting of hypersensitivity signs/symptoms in a subject subset. Objective laboratory investigations indicated that potential underlying hypersensitivity mechanisms were unlikely to have been activated; the results suggest that most of the observed hypersensitivity reactions were unlikely IgE/IgG-mediated.
CONCLUSION: Dose-dependent hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis reactions to sugammadex were observed when administered without prior neuromuscular blocking agent. Laboratory investigations do not suggest prevalent allergen-specific IgE/IgG-mediated immunologic hypersensitivity. Because it could not be fully excluded that estimates of hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis incidence were unbiased, an additional study was conducted to characterise the potential for hypersensitivity reactions and is described in a companion report. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00988065; Protocol number P06042.
Copyright © 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaphylaxis; hypersensitivity; sugammadex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30236238     DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  10 in total

Review 1.  Reversal of neuromuscular block.

Authors:  J M Hunter
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  Optimizing Reversal of Neuromuscular Block in Older Adults: Sugammadex or Neostigmine.

Authors:  Brandon M Togioka; Katie J Schenning
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.271

3.  Residual paralysis caused by 50 mg rocuronium after reversal with 4 mg/kg sugammadex: a case report.

Authors:  Kohji Uzawa; Hiroyuki Seki; Tomoko Yorozu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Anaphylaxis induced by sugammadex and sugammadex-rocuronium complex -a case report.

Authors:  Shu Chung Choi; Sangbin Han; Jueun Kwak; Ji Yung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-10-17

5.  Magnesium sulfate reduces the rocuronium dose needed for satisfactory double lumen tube placement conditions in patients with myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  Shoujun Fei; Hengfu Xia; Xiaowei Chen; Dazhi Pang; Xuebing Xu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 6.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update.

Authors:  Erik Stenberg; Luiz Fernando Dos Reis Falcão; Mary O'Kane; Ronald Liem; Dimitri J Pournaras; Paulina Salminen; Richard D Urman; Anupama Wadhwa; Ulf O Gustafsson; Anders Thorell
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Adverse events of sugammadex that occurred in a Korean population.

Authors:  Woong Han; Jong Min Lee; Dong Ho Park; Chia An Lee; Chang Yeong Jeong; Hong Seuk Yang
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2022-04-05

8.  Sugammadex in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Jae Moon Choi; Hong Seuk Yang
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 9.  Perioperative Anaphylaxis: Evaluation and Management.

Authors:  Deepti Vellaichamy Manian; Gerald W Volcheck
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 10.  Advantages and pitfalls of clinical application of sugammadex.

Authors:  Hyung Young Lee; Ki Tae Jung
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2020-07-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.