| Literature DB >> 30236129 |
Natacha Kadlub1,2,3,4, Quentin Sessiecq5, Marion Mandavit6, Aurore Coulomb L'Hermine7,8, Cecile Badoual9,6,10, Louise Galmiche9,11, Ariane Berdal12,13, Vianney Descroix12,13,14, Arnaud Picard12,9,15,16, Amélie E Coudert12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cherubism is a rare autosomal dominant disorder of the jaws caused by mutation of the SH3BP2 gene. The bone is replaced by a fibrous granuloma containing multinucleated giant cells. Cells of the cherubism granuloma have never been systematically analyzed. Hence, the aim of this study was to characterize the cells in human cherubism granulomas, to determine the osteoclastic characteristics of the multinucleated giant cells and to investigate the potential role of TNF-α in human cherubism.Entities:
Keywords: Auto-inflammatory bone disease; Cherubism; NFATc1; Osteoclast; RANKL; TNF-α
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30236129 PMCID: PMC6148781 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-018-0907-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Patient classification
| Age | Classification | Definition | Patient | Age at surgery (years) | Gender | Radiological grade | Evolution | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child Patients | 1-A | Low degree of aggressiveness: radiologic grade I with a favorable evolution after surgery | 1-A | 16 | M | I.2 | c.1244 G > A | Favorable |
| 1-B | Moderate degree of aggressiveness: radiologic grade II-IV with a favorable evolution after surgery | 1-B1 | 9 | F | II.1 | c.1244 G > A | Favorable | |
| 1-B2 | 8 | M | II.1 | c.1244 G > A | Favorable | |||
| 1-C | High degree of aggressiveness: radiologic grade I-VI with an unfavorable evolution after surgery | 1-C1 | 8 | M | V | c.1244 G > A | Unfavorable (recurrence and extension) | |
| 1-C2 | 7 | M | VI | c.1253 C > G | Unfavorable (recurrence and extension) | |||
| Adult Patients | 2-A | Remodeling bone | 2-A | 19 | F | N/A | c.1244 G > A | N/A |
| 2-B | Acute exacerbation | 2-B | 45 | F | VI.3 | c.1244 G > A | N/A |
Cherubism cases were classified according to their age at surgery and sub-classified according to granuloma aggressiveness based on radiologic classification [20] and evolution after surgery. Age at the surgery, gender, radiologic grade, evolution and type of SH3BP2 mutation are shown
RANK/RANKL/OPG triad and NFATc1 expression by cherubism-granuloma cells
| RANK | RANK-L | OPG | NFAT-c1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stromal cells (cytoplasmic) | CMGC (cytoplasmic) | Stromal cells | MGC | Stromal cells | MGC | cMGC (cytoplasmic) | cMGC (Nuclear) | |
| 1-A | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 1-B1 | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | – |
| 1-B2 | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
| 1-C1 | + | + | + | – | + | – | + | + |
| 1-C2 | + | + | + | – | + | – | + | + |
| 2-A | – | – | – | NA | + | – | – | – |
| 2-B | – | – | + | – | – | – | + | + |
Expression of each protein was evaluated for MGC and stromal cells. For NFATc1, numbers of nuclear and cytoplasmic positive cells were evaluated. For each assay five randomly selected areas were evaluated (200× high-power field)
Fig. 1Histopathological characteristics of cherubism granulomas. Granuloma sections were stained with HES (hematoxylin-eosin-safranin). Cherubism granulomas are heterogeneous lesions both within a granuloma and among patients (scale bar 200 μm). a Case 1-C1 showed multinucleated giant cells (black arrows) (MGC), mononuclear cells and collagen (safaranin-orange coloration) stroma. b Case 1-C1 showed fibrous collagen-rich stroma, vessels (black arrow) with hyalinosis cuffing. c Case 1-B1 showed MGC (black arrows), with mononuclear cells and a collagen (safranin)-rich stroma. d Case 1-B1 showed a fibrous collagen-rich stroma. e Case 2-A showed immature bone within a fibrous stroma. f Case 2-B showed MGC with intracytoplasmic vacuoles (black arrows), mononuclear cells and collagen (safaranin-orange coloration) stroma
Identification of cherubism granuloma cells (CD5, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, AE1/AE3, Vimentin, TRAP activity)
| Cells/20HPF | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD5 Lymphocytes | CD20 B-Cells | CD3 T-Cells | CD4 LT4 | CD8 CD8+ | CD68 mononuclear Monocytes | CD68 Multinuclear Osteoclast-like | Vimentin Semi-quantitative | AE1/AE3 | TRAP Osteoclast-like | |
| 1-A | 15 [9–20] | 0 | 14.8 [8–18] | 0 | 14.6 [8–21] | 5.4 [3–9] | 1.4 [0–3] | +++ | 0 | 0 |
| 1-B1 | 8 [6–9] | 0.2 [0–1] | 7 [4–9] | 0.6 [0–2] | 6.8 [2–9] | 18 [9–32] | 3.2 [1–5] | +++ | 0 | 4 [0–6] |
| 1-B2 | 2.6 [0–7] | 0 | 1.6 [0–3] | 0.6 [0–1] | 2 [1–3] | 34.24 [31–37] | 2.8 [1–5] | +++ | 0 | 0 |
| 1-C1 | 19.2 [8–37] | 2.4 [0–6] | 29.2 [18–30] | 4.4 [0–11] | 21.6 [6–32] | 14 [6–22] | 8,2[0–10] | +++ | 0 | 8.6 [8–10] |
| 1-C2 | 31 [15–48] | 0.2 [0–1] | 19.6 [15–27] | 4.2 [0–10] | 17 [4–37) | 21.8 [10–35] | 13.2 [7–20] | +++ | 0 | 7.4 [3–11] |
| 2-A | 0.6 [0–2] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 [0–2] | 0.4 [0–2] | +++ | 0 | 0 |
| 2-B | 21.4 [10–33] | 0.6 [0–2] | 31.6 [27–35] | 0.6 [0–2] | 7.2 [3–15] | 14.6 [8–19] | 2.8 [2–6] | +++ | 0 | 3.2 [1–5] |
Number of positive cells was evaluated for each assay from five randomly selected areas (200× high-power field; HPF). Vimentin expression was semi-quantitatively evaluated (0 = vimentin negative; + few positive cells; ++ less than the half positive cells; +++ more than half positive cells). CD5 identifies lymphoid cells; CD3, T cells; CD4, T4 cells; CD8, CD8 + cells; CD20, B cells; CD68 determines monocyte lineage cells, immature macrophages (mononucleated cells), macrophages or osteoclasts (multinucleated cells); AE1/AE3 identifies epithelial cells, vimentin mesenchymal cells, TRAP activity in osteoclast cells when multinucleated (> 3 nuclei)
Fig. 2Characterization of cells present in cherubism granulomas (CD5, CD8, CD68, TRAP activity). (CD5, CD8, CD68 scale bar = 100 μm; TRAP activity scale bar = 50 μm). a-d: Case 1-B1, child with moderately aggressive cherubism: granuloma is composed of fibroblastic stroma with CD8+ cells and monocytes. a Identification of lymphoid cells (black arrow: CD5-positive cells) within the stroma. b Identification CD8+ lymphoid cells (black arrow: CD8-positive cells) within the stroma. c Identification CD68-positive cells, principally composed of monocytes (black arrow: mononuclear CD68-positive cell); and few macrophages (red arrow: multinuclear CD68-positive cell). d TRAP assay (× 20) showed that MGC are TRAP negative (considered as macrophages: red arrow). e-h Case 1-C1, child with highly aggressive cherubism. Granuloma is composed of fibroblastic stroma with CD8+ cells and osteoclast-like cells. e CD5 staining showed lymphoid cells within the stroma (black arrow). f CD8 staining showed CD8+ lymphoid cells within the stroma (black arrow). g CD68 staining showed cells principally composed of macrophages (multinuclear CD68-positive cell, red arrow) and monocytes (mononuclear CD68-positive cell, black arrow). h TRAP assay showed numerous TRAP-positive MGC (osteoclasts, red arrow). TRAP: Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase
Fig. 3Bone remodeling marker: RANK-L, OPG, RANK, NFATc1 immunohistochemistry. a Case 1-C2 showed that both stromal and MGC cells express RANK in their cytoplasm (black arrow) (scale bar = 50 μm). b Case 1-C1 showed that stromal cells around MGC (black arrow) express OPG (scale bar = 200 μm). c Case 1-C1 mononuclear stromal cells (black arrow) distant from MGC express RANKL (scale bar = 200 μm). d Case 1-C2 showed expression of NFATc1 in MGC nuclei and cytoplasm (scale bar = 100 μm)
Fig. 4Cherubism giant multinucleated cells differentiate into osteoclasts in culture. Cultures in standard and osteoclastogenic media of cherubism granuloma at day 7 (cases 1B-1, 1B-2, 1-C1, 1-C2, 2-B) compared to osteoclasts obtained from healthy-donor PBMC-differentiation cultures at day 14 (control). 1-A: Cherubism differentiates into osteoclast (> 3 nuclei, TRAP+ cells) at day 7 in standard and osteoclastogenic media. Number of osteoclasts at day 7 in cherubism is not significantly different from the PBMC culture at day 14. 1-B: Number of nuclei of cherubism osteoclasts at day 7 cultivated in osteoclastogenic medium is significantly increased compared to the number of nuclei in osteoclasts from PBMC culture at day 14 (p = 0.002). 1-C: Size of cherubism osteoclasts at day 7 cultivated in osteoclastogenic or standard medium is not significantly different from the size of healthy donor osteoclasts
Fig. 5Cherubism MGC are osteoclasts. a-d: TRAP Assay, × 20 (scale bar = 50 μm), E and F: Resorption assay × 10 (scale bar = 200 μm). a-c, Case 2-B. Cherubism cells cultured in standard (a) and osteoclastogenic (c) medium at day 3 showed that MGC are TRAP-positive, b-d Case 2-B. Cherubism cells cultured in standard (b) and osteoclastogenic (d) medium at day 7. Osteoclast number, osteoclast size and nuclei number increased from day 3 to day 7. e-f Case 2-B. Bone slices displayed pit formation at day 7 in standard (e) osteoclastogenic medium (f) (arrow). These images are representative of what was observed for all the cultures
Fig. 6Cytokine expression in culture supernatant. The supernatant of both cell-culture types (standard medium and osteoclastogenic medium) was studied at day 3 and day 7. TNF-α was detected in the supernatant of all cultures. IL-6 was detected in the supernatant of all cultures at a higher level than TNF-α. OPG was detected in the supernatant of all cultures, whereas RANK-L levels were lower than OPG. D3 and D7 (3rd and 7th days of culture in standard medium), D3+ and D7+ (3rd and 7th days of culture in osteoclastogenic medium). RANK-L (receptor of activated nuclear factor kappa B ligand), OPG (osteoprotegerin), M-CSF (macrophage colony stimulating factor), IL (interleukin), TNF (tumor necrosis factor)