Literature DB >> 30235968

Comparison of virtual visit versus traditional clinic for management of varicose veins.

Judith C Lin1,2, Dylan Mclaughlin3, Dana Zurawski1, Nicole Kennedy3, Loay Kabbani1.   

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with varicose veins managed in the telemedicine clinic and traditional clinic.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of all vein procedures in the institutional Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry (VQI VVR) was performed from January 2015 to August 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: Telemedicine versus Traditional Clinic. Comparison data included patient demographics, past medical history, clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes and postoperative complications. Statistical testing included chi-square test for categorical variables and student t-test for continuous variables using the SPSS statistical software.
Results: A total of 1034 varicose vein procedures were performed during the 31-month study period. There were 75 virtual encounters in the Telemedicine Clinic (Group A) and 959 face-to-face encounters in the Traditional Clinic (Group B). Most of the demographics characteristics were clinically similar in both groups. Comparing Group A and Group B, there were no differences in age, sex, race and body mass index. Early 3-month follow up was 100% in Group A and 90.7% in Group B. Both groups had low complication rates of haematoma (1.3% vs 0.3%, p = 0.884), paraesthesia (1.3% vs 0.6%, p = 0.767) and recanalisation (1.3% vs 4.0%, p = 0.383) during the early follow up period. Discussion: Synchronous virtual visits for patient care are feasible for the management of chronic venous disease. Patients with varicose veins who choose to undergo telemedicine evaluations have similar pre-operative demographics, clinical classification and patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-benefits; remote consultation; telehealth; telemedicine

Year:  2018        PMID: 30235968     DOI: 10.1177/1357633X18797181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  3 in total

1.  Telemedicine platforms and their use in the coronavirus disease-19 era to deliver comprehensive vascular care.

Authors:  Judith C Lin; Misty D Humphries; William P Shutze; Oliver O Aalami; Uwe M Fischer; Kim J Hodgson
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Exploring agreement and feasibility between virtual home visits and in-person home visits for peritoneal dialysis patients-a paired study.

Authors:  Jin Chen; Bo Zheng; Lijuan Yin; Qin Zhou; Wenshu Liu; Pengli Li; Xiuxiu Zhao; Xiuling Chen; Yi Li; Hanlu Ding; Guisen Li
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 2.606

3.  Factors Associated With the Utilization of Outpatient Virtual Clinics: Retrospective Observational Study Using Multilevel Analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Hsian Yin; Hui-Chu Lang; Yun-Hsuan Tzeng; Kuan-Chia Lin; Jeng Wei; Hao-Ren Liou; Hung-Ju Sung
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 7.076

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.