Literature DB >> 30235950

The art and science of non-evaluation evaluation.

Lorelei Jones1.   

Abstract

This essay considers some limitations of programme theory evaluation in relation to healthcare policies. This approach, which seeks to surface 'programme theories' or construct 'logic models', is often unable to account for empirical observations of policy implementation in real-world contexts. I argue that this failure stems from insufficient theoretical elaboration of the social, cultural and political dimensions of healthcare policies. Drawing from institutional theory, critical theory and discourse theory, I set out an alternative agenda for policy research. I illustrate the issues with respect to programme theory evaluation with examples from my experience of research on large-scale strategic change in the English NHS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evaluation; implementation; policy research

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30235950     DOI: 10.1177/1355819618779614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  3 in total

1.  Transforming health care: the policy and politics of service reconfiguration in the UK's four health systems.

Authors:  Ellen Stewart; Scott L Greer; Angelo Ercia; Peter D Donnelly
Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law       Date:  2019-04-12

2.  Changing health care with, for, or against the public: an empirical investigation into the place of the public in health service reconfiguration.

Authors:  Scott L Greer; Ellen Stewart; Angelo Ercia; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2020-07-19

3.  Why doesn't integrated care work? Using Strong Structuration Theory to explain the limitations of an English case.

Authors:  Gemma Hughes; Sara E Shaw; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2021-11-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.