| Literature DB >> 30235878 |
Yujie Wang1, Jideng Ma2, Wanling Qiu3, Jinwei Zhang4, Siyuan Feng5, Xiankun Zhou6, Xun Wang7, Long Jin8, Keren Long9, Lingyan Liu10, Weihang Xiao11, Qianzi Tang12, Li Zhu13, Yanzhi Jiang14, Xuewei Li15, Mingzhou Li16.
Abstract
Guanidinoacetic acid (GAA), an amino acid derivative that is endogenous to animal tissues including muscle and nerve, has been reported to enhance muscular performance. MicroRNA (miRNA) is a post-transcriptional regulator that plays a key role in nutrient-mediated myogenesis. However, the effects of GAA on myogenic differentiation and skeletal muscle growth, and the potential regulatory mechanisms of miRNA in these processes have not been elucidated. In this study, we investigated the effects of GAA on proliferation, differentiation, and growth in C2C12 cells and mice. The results showed that GAA markedly inhibited the proliferation of myoblasts, along with the down-regulation of cyclin D1 (CCND1) and cyclin dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) mRNA expression, and the upregulation of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (P21) mRNA expression. We also demonstrated that GAA treatment stimulated myogenic differentiation 1 (MyoD) and myogenin (MyoG) mRNA expression, resulting in an increase in the myotube fusion rate. Meanwhile, GAA supplementation promoted myotube growth through increase in total myosin heavy chain (MyHC) protein level, myotubes thickness and gastrocnemius muscle cross-sectional area. Furthermore, small RNA sequencing revealed that a total of eight miRNAs, including miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p cluster, showed differential expression after GAA supplementation. To further study the function of miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p in GAA-induced skeletal muscle growth, we transfected miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p mimics into myotube, which also induced muscle growth. Through bioinformatics and a dual-luciferase reporter system, the target genes of miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p were determined. These two miRNAs were shown to modulate the Akt/mTOR/S6K signaling pathway by restraining target gene expression. Taken together, these findings suggest that GAA supplementation can promote myoblast differentiation and skeletal muscle growth through miR-133a-3p- and miR-1a-3p-induced activation of the AKT/mTOR/S6K signaling pathway.Entities:
Keywords: C2C12; differentiation; guanidinoacetic acid; microRNA; muscle growth; skeletal muscle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30235878 PMCID: PMC6163908 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19092837
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Effect of Guanidinoacetic Acid (GAA) on proliferating myoblasts. Myoblasts were cultivated in growth medium (GM) or differentiation medium (DM) in the presence of 0, 5, 10, or 20 mM GAA. (A,B) EdU analysis showed that GAA significantly reduced the cell proliferation ratio; (C) CCK-8 tests indicated that cell growth was suppressed by GAA in a dose-dependent manner; (D) relative expression of marker genes of proliferation, including Cyclin D1 (CCND1), Cyclin Dependent Kinase 4 (CDK4) and Cyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 1A (P21) after treatment with the concentration gradient of GAA; (E) images were obtained by brightfield microscopy on the fourth day of myoblast differentiation after stimulation with the concentration gradient of GAA; (F) the relative expression of myogenic differentiation 1 (MyoD). The results are expressed as mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared with the negative control (on the bars) or between the indicated groups (Tukey’s post-hoc test).
Figure 2Effect of GAA on myoblasts during differentiation. (A) An overview of the experimental procedures; (B,C) myoblasts were induced to differentiate in the presence or absence of 20 mM GAA for 6 days. Images were obtained by brightfield microscopy on the 6th day of myoblast differentiation after 20 mM GAA treatment. Meanwhile, cells were stained with anti-MyHC antibody and the fusion index was calculated (Student’s t-test); negative control (NC) means a cell undergoes normal differentiation process; (D) the relative expression of marker genes of skeletal muscle differentiation (early phase: MyoD, later phase: MyoG) was examined by quantitative real-time PCR (Student’s t-test). The results are expressed as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared with the negative control on the bars).
Figure 3GAA modulates miRNA expression profile. Myoblasts were placed in DM with or without 20 mM GAA; 6 days later, total RNA was collected and small RNA-seq was carried out. (A) Venn diagram showing the numbers of overlapping and unique miRNAs detected in negative control and GAA-stimulated groups; (B) hierarchical clustering analysis for myotubes treated with GAA; NC-1 and NC-2 are two duplicates of the negative control; GAA-1 and GAA-2 are two duplicates of the GAA control; (C) the DE miRNAs that overlap between the negative control and GAA control; (D) GO (Gene Ontology) categories and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways enriched for target genes of DE miRNAs in myotubes (N-Gene: the number of genes enriched into indicated item, N-miRNA: the number of miRNA enriched into indicated item).
Figure 4Effect of GAA on myoblasts during muscle growth. (A) The expression of miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p during myoblast differentiation after GAA treatment (Student’s t-test); (B) myotubes were stained with anti-MyHC antibody and the myotube thickness was determined (Student’s t-test); (C) MyHC protein levels were calculated by western blotting (Student’s t-test); (D) the expression of miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p after GAA supplement in mouse gastrocnemius tissue (Tukey’s post-hoc test); (E) hematoxylin-eosin staining of gastrocnemius muscle and the quantification of muscle fiber size(CSA: cross-sectional area); (F) MyHC protein levels were calculated by western blotting in mouse gastrocnemius tissue (Tukey’s post-hoc test); (G,H) the protein degradation marker genes (CTSL and FBXO32) were quantified by real-time PCR (Student’s t-test). Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared with the negative control (on the bars) or between the indicated groups.
Figure 5The downregulation of miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p promotes muscle growth. (A,B) The relative expression of miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p after overexpression of miRNA; (C,D) myotubes were placed in DM with and without GAA for differentiation for 6 days and then stained with anti-MyHC antibody. Myotube thickness was calculated (m-ctrl: mimic control; m133: miR-133a-3p mimic; i133: miR-133a-3p inhibitor; m1: miR-1a-3p mimic; i1: miR-1a-3p inhibitor); (E) the protein levels of total MyHC were calculated by western blotting after the overexpression of miRNA mimic; (F,G) the expression of marker genes of protein degradation (CTSL and FBXO32) was quantified by real-time PCR. The results are expressed as mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared with the negative control (on the bars) or between the indicated groups (Tukey’s post-hoc test).
Figure 6The downregulation of miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p promotes skeletal muscle growth by activating Akt/mTOR signaling. (A) Potential binding sites for miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p in the 3′UTR of Insr and EIF4E mRNA, respectively, predicted by RNAhybrid (MFE: minimal free energy); (B) the relative expression of the miRNA target gene after GAA treatment or miRNA mimic overexpression (Student’s t-test) (R: Pearson correlation coefficient); (C) the relative expression of the miRNA target gene after miRNA mimic overexpression (Tukey’s post-hoc test); (D) luciferase reporter assay indicated that transfection with miRNA mimic significantly suppressed the relative activity of luciferase (Student’s t-test); (E,F) the Akt, mTOR and S6K phosphorylation levels detected by western blotting after the overexpression of miRNA mimic or GAA treatment (Tukey’s post-hoc test). The results are expressed as mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared with negative control (on the bars) or mimic control (on the bars) or between the indicated groups.