| Literature DB >> 30235454 |
Christos Toumpanakis1, Nicola Fazio2, Eva Tiensuu Janson3, Dieter Hörsch4, Andreas Pascher5, Nicholas Reed6, Dermot O Apos Toole7, Els Nieveen van Dijkum8, Stefano Partelli9, Anja Rinke10, Beata Kos-Kudla11, Frederico Costa12, Ulrich-Frank Pape13, Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg14, Jean-Yves Scoazec15.
Abstract
Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ANEN) are mostly discovered coincidentally during appendicectomy and usually have a benign clinical course; thus, appendicectomy alone is considered curative. However, in some cases, a malignant potential is suspected, and therefore additional operations such as completion right hemicolectomy are considered. The existing European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) guidelines provide useful data about epidemiology and prognosis, as well as practical recommendations with regards to the risk factors for a more aggressive disease course and the indications for a secondary operation. However, these guidelines are based on heterogeneous and retrospective studies. Therefore, the evidence does not seem to be robust, and there are still unmet needs in terms of accurate epidemiology and overall prognosis, optimal diagnostic and follow-up strategy, as well as identified risk factors that would indicate a more aggressive surgical approach at the beginning and a more intense follow-up. In this review, we are adopting a critical approach of the ENETS guidelines and published series for ANEN, focusing on the above-noted "grey areas".Entities:
Keywords: Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms; Appendicectomy; Appendix; Carcinoids; Right hemicolectomy
Year: 2018 PMID: 30235454 DOI: 10.1159/000493894
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroendocrinology ISSN: 0028-3835 Impact factor: 4.914