Dan J Vick1, Asa B Wilson2, Michael Fisher3, Carrie Roseamelia4. 1. Vice President of Medical Affairs, St. Vincent Evansville, Evansville, Indiana; formerly Vice President for Medical Affairs and Chief Medical Officer, Oneida Healthcare, Oneida, New York. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Health Care Administration, Methodist University, Fayetteville, North Carolina. 3. Chair and Professor, Division of Health Services Education, Rueckert-Hartman College for Health Professions, Regis University, Denver, Colorado. 4. Assistant Dean for Rural Medicine and Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The intent of this study was to assess disaster preparedness in community hospitals across New York. DESIGN: Descriptive and analytical cross-sectional survey study. The survey instrument consisted of 35 questions that examined six elements of disaster preparedness: disaster plan development, onsite surge capacity, available materials and resources, disaster education and training, disaster preparedness funding levels, and perception of disaster preparedness. SETTING: Community hospitals in New York. SUBJECTS: Contact information was obtained for 207 of 208 community hospitals. Email invitations to participate in the survey were sent to hospital CEOs and disaster preparedness coordinators. Completed surveys were received from 80 hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital responses to questions related to the six elements of disaster preparedness. RESULTS: Most (87.5 percent) hospitals had experienced a disaster event during the past 5 years (2012-2016). Eighty percent had disaster plans that addressed all of six major types of disasters. Only 17.5 percent believed their disaster plans were "very sufficient" and did not require any revisions. Nearly three-quarters (73.3 percent) of hospitals could continue operations for less than a week without external resources. Less than half (49.4 percent) reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the level of funding that they received from the Hospital Preparedness Program. Most (88.8 percent) respondents felt that barriers to disaster preparedness exist for their organizations. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the current level of disaster preparedness among New York hospitals. The study's approach is discussed as a model that will enable hospitals to identify focus areas for improvement and opportunities for legislation and advocacy.
OBJECTIVE: The intent of this study was to assess disaster preparedness in community hospitals across New York. DESIGN: Descriptive and analytical cross-sectional survey study. The survey instrument consisted of 35 questions that examined six elements of disaster preparedness: disaster plan development, onsite surge capacity, available materials and resources, disaster education and training, disaster preparedness funding levels, and perception of disaster preparedness. SETTING: Community hospitals in New York. SUBJECTS: Contact information was obtained for 207 of 208 community hospitals. Email invitations to participate in the survey were sent to hospital CEOs and disaster preparedness coordinators. Completed surveys were received from 80 hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital responses to questions related to the six elements of disaster preparedness. RESULTS: Most (87.5 percent) hospitals had experienced a disaster event during the past 5 years (2012-2016). Eighty percent had disaster plans that addressed all of six major types of disasters. Only 17.5 percent believed their disaster plans were "very sufficient" and did not require any revisions. Nearly three-quarters (73.3 percent) of hospitals could continue operations for less than a week without external resources. Less than half (49.4 percent) reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the level of funding that they received from the Hospital Preparedness Program. Most (88.8 percent) respondents felt that barriers to disaster preparedness exist for their organizations. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the current level of disaster preparedness among New York hospitals. The study's approach is discussed as a model that will enable hospitals to identify focus areas for improvement and opportunities for legislation and advocacy.
Authors: William Stephens; Grete E Wilt; Erica Adams Lehnert; NoelleAngelique M Molinari; Tanya Telfair LeBlanc Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Mehdi Beyramijam; Seyedeh Moloud Rasouli-Ghahfarokhi; Abazar Fathollahzadeh; Aziz Rahimzadeh; Mohammad Ali Shahabirabori; Mohsen Aminizadeh Journal: J Educ Health Promot Date: 2019-11-29