Literature DB >> 30234622

The Demographic and Geographic Trends of Meniscal Procedures in New York State: An Analysis of 649,470 Patients Over 13 years.

Kelly I Suchman1,2, Omar A Behery2, David H Mai2, Utkarsh Anil2, Joseph A Bosco2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the geographic and demographic variations and time trends of different types of meniscal procedures in New York State to determine whether disparities exist in access to treatment.
METHODS: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) outpatient database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent elective, primary knee arthroscopy between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2015, for 1 of the following diagnosis-related categories: Group 1, meniscectomy; Group 2, meniscal repair; and Group 3, meniscal allograft transplantation, with or without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The 3 groups of meniscal procedures were compared on geographic distribution, patient age, insurance, concomitant ACLR, and surgeon and hospital volume over the study period.
RESULTS: A total of 649,470 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy between 2003 and 2015 were identified for analysis. Both meniscectomies and meniscal repairs had a scattered distribution throughout New York State, with allograft volume concentrated at urban academic hospitals. The majority of patients who underwent any meniscal procedure had private insurance, with Medicaid patients having the lowest rates of meniscal surgery. At high-volume hospitals, meniscal repairs and allografts are being performed with increasing frequency, especially in patients <25 years of age. Meniscal repairs are being performed concomitantly with ACLR with increasing frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: Meniscal repairs and allografts are being performed at high-volume hospitals for privately insured patients with increasing frequency. Geographic access to these treatments, particularly allografts, is limited. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Disparities in the availability of advanced meniscal treatment require further investigation and understanding to improve access to care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30234622     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cartilage Restoration for Tibiofemoral Bipolar Lesions Results in Promising Failure Rates: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anirudh K Gowd; Alexander E Weimer; Danielle E Rider; Edward C Beck; Avinesh Agarwalla; Lisa K O'Brien; Michael J Alaia; Cristin M Ferguson; Brian R Waterman
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-24

2.  Opioid Use After Common Sports Medicine Procedures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Mitesh Mehta; Fernando Huyke; Michael A Terry; Vehniah K Tjong
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Return to Work Following Arthroscopic Meniscal Allograft Transplantation.

Authors:  Avinesh Agarwalla; Joseph N Liu; David R Christian; Grant H Garcia; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Anirudh K Gowd; Adam B Yanke; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  CORR Insights®: Likelihood of Return to Duty Is Low After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation in an Active-duty Military Population.

Authors:  Jan M K Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Recent Trends in Concomitant Meniscal Procedures During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew J Partan; Cesar R Iturriaga; Randy M Cohn
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23

6.  Analysis of Charges and Payments for Outpatient Arthroscopic Meniscectomy From 2005 to 2014: Hospital Reimbursement Increased Steadily as Surgeon Payments Declined.

Authors:  Matthew D LaPrade; Christopher L Camp; Aaron J Krych; Brian C Werner
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.