Literature DB >> 30233873

Impact of the introduction of thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Makoto Odaka1, Yuki Noda1, Yo Tsukamoto1, Daiki Kato1, Takamasa Shibasaki1, Shohei Mori1, Hisatoshi Asano1, Hideki Matsudaira1, Makoto Yamashita1, Toshiaki Morikawa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated the impact of the introduction of thoracoscopic lung lobectomy (TL) for non-small cell lung cancer at our institution.
METHODS: This study retrospectively compared surgical and oncological outcomes in the period before and after the introduction of TL for non-small cell lung cancer. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed with respect to baseline patient variables and tumor characteristics.
RESULTS: Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent lung lobectomy in the period before (BI group, n=261) and after (AI group, n=261) the introduction of TL. The proportion of TLs at our institution increased from 1.3% in the BI group to 93% in the AI group. The AI group experienced a longer duration of surgery, lesser intraoperative blood loss, and a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (POHS). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. The median follow-up period was 50 months in both groups. No significant differences were observed between the BI and AI groups with respect to 5-year overall survival (OS) (76.1% and 71.7%, respectively; P=0.1973) and disease-free survival (DFS) (67.6% and 66.1%, respectively; P=0.4071). On multivariate analysis, pathological N1-2 status was an independent predictor of survival. AI group and TL showed no independent association with survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of TL represented a positive change at our institution owing to decreased invasiveness and oncological equivalence of the surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thoracoscopy; disease-free survival (DFS); lung cancer

Year:  2018        PMID: 30233873      PMCID: PMC6129920          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  25 in total

1.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Walter J Scott; Mark S Allen; Gail Darling; Bryan Meyers; Paul A Decker; Joe B Putnam; Robert W McKenna; Rodney J Landrenau; David R Jones; Richard I Inculet; Richard A Malthaner
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Mark W Onaitis; Rebecca P Petersen; Stafford S Balderson; Eric Toloza; William R Burfeind; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: 3-year initial experience with 200 cases.

Authors:  Diego Gonzalez; Mercedes de la Torre; Marina Paradela; Ricardo Fernandez; Maria Delgado; Jose Garcia; Eva Fieira; Lucia Mendez
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Is video-assisted lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer oncologically equivalent to open lobectomy?

Authors:  Waël C Hanna; Moira de Valence; Eshetu G Atenafu; Marcelo Cypel; Thomas K Waddell; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Andrew Pierre; Marc De Perrot; Shaf Keshavjee; Gail E Darling
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 5.  Long-term survival in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs open lobectomy in lung-cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emanuela Taioli; Dong-Seok Lee; Martin Lesser; Raja Flores
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thoracotomy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score analysis based on a multi-institutional registry.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Zhi-Hua Zhu; Tristan D Yan; Qun Wang; Gening Jiang; Lunxu Liu; Deruo Liu; Zheng Wang; Wenlong Shao; Deborah Black; Qian Zhao; Jianxing He
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases.

Authors:  Robert J McKenna; Ward Houck; Clark Beeman Fuller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: an unavoidable trend? A retrospective single-institution series of 410 cases.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Marty-Ané; Ludovic Canaud; Laurence Solovei; Pierre Alric; Jean-Philippe Berthet
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-16

9.  Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Raja M Flores; Bernard J Park; Joseph Dycoco; Anna Aronova; Yael Hirth; Nabil P Rizk; Manjit Bains; Robert J Downey; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Safety and efficacy of video-assisted versus conventional lung resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  Farhood Farjah; Douglas E Wood; Michael S Mulligan; Bahirathan Krishnadasan; Patrick J Heagerty; Rebecca Gaston Symons; David R Flum
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.