BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the predictors and prognosis of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in patients admitted for post-myocardial infarction (MI) and left ventricular dysfunction after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 267 consecutive post-MI patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <0.45 based on the Shanghai East Hospital PCI database since 2012. Altogether 25 (9.36%) patients were selected as the LVT group. Baseline, angiographic, procedural characteristics and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared by Chi-square test, t-test or Kaplan-Meier survival analysis as appropriate. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for the accuracy of the multivariate analysis model. A multiple logistic regression was applied to predict LVT formation. RESULTS: The independent risk factors of LVT were left ventricular aneurysm [odds ratio (OR): 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.52, P<0.01], incomplete revascularization (OR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.35, P<0.01), SYNTAX score (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.14-1.43, P<0.01) and D-dimer (OR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.19-3.04, P<0.01). The SYNTAX score and D-dimer effectively indicated the development of LVT with optimal cutoff values of 29.50 and 1.53 mg/L, respectively. Patients with LVT had significantly worse outcomes at 1-year clinical follow-up, especially higher incidence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that the presence of left ventricular aneurysm, incomplete revascularization, higher SYNTAX score and D-dimer level were the independent predictors of LVT formation in post-MI and LV dysfunction patients, which related to worse clinical outcomes. Future studies for early intervention and complete revascularization in high-risk subgroup patients are expected.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the predictors and prognosis of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in patients admitted for post-myocardial infarction (MI) and left ventricular dysfunction after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 267 consecutive post-MI patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <0.45 based on the Shanghai East Hospital PCI database since 2012. Altogether 25 (9.36%) patients were selected as the LVT group. Baseline, angiographic, procedural characteristics and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared by Chi-square test, t-test or Kaplan-Meier survival analysis as appropriate. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for the accuracy of the multivariate analysis model. A multiple logistic regression was applied to predict LVT formation. RESULTS: The independent risk factors of LVT were left ventricular aneurysm [odds ratio (OR): 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.52, P<0.01], incomplete revascularization (OR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.35, P<0.01), SYNTAX score (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.14-1.43, P<0.01) and D-dimer (OR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.19-3.04, P<0.01). The SYNTAX score and D-dimer effectively indicated the development of LVT with optimal cutoff values of 29.50 and 1.53 mg/L, respectively. Patients with LVT had significantly worse outcomes at 1-year clinical follow-up, especially higher incidence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that the presence of left ventricular aneurysm, incomplete revascularization, higher SYNTAX score and D-dimer level were the independent predictors of LVT formation in post-MI and LV dysfunction patients, which related to worse clinical outcomes. Future studies for early intervention and complete revascularization in high-risk subgroup patients are expected.
Entities:
Keywords:
Left ventricular thrombus (LVT); left ventricular dysfunction; myocardial infarction (MI); percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Authors: Derek S Chew; Stephen B Wilton; Katherine Kavanagh; Danielle A Southern; Liong Eng Tan-Mesiatowsky; Derek V Exner Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Patrick T O'Gara; Frederick G Kushner; Deborah D Ascheim; Donald E Casey; Mina K Chung; James A de Lemos; Steven M Ettinger; James C Fang; Francis M Fesmire; Barry A Franklin; Christopher B Granger; Harlan M Krumholz; Jane A Linderbaum; David A Morrow; L Kristin Newby; Joseph P Ornato; Narith Ou; Martha J Radford; Jacqueline E Tamis-Holland; Carl L Tommaso; Cynthia M Tracy; Y Joseph Woo; David X Zhao Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1989 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Björn Redfors; Christian Dworeck; Oskar Angerås; Inger Haraldsson; Petur Petursson; Jacob Odenstedt; Dan Ioanes; Sebastian Völz; Magnus Hiller; Per Fransson; Jason Stewart; Henrik Fryklund; Per Albertsson; Truls Råmunddal; Elmir Omerovic Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-09-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: William J Powers; Colin P Derdeyn; José Biller; Christopher S Coffey; Brian L Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; S Claiborne Johnston; Alexander A Khalessi; Chelsea S Kidwell; James F Meschia; Bruce Ovbiagele; Dileep R Yavagal Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 10.170
Authors: Mengjia Chen; Dan Liu; Frank Weidemann; Björn Daniel Lengenfelder; Georg Ertl; Kai Hu; Stefan Frantz; Peter Nordbeck Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-09-08
Authors: Cheng Li; Wenjie Lau; Ningjing Qian; Liuguang Song; Chunna Jin; Dao Zhou; Yi Yu; Xiaohong Pan; Quan Zhou Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-08
Authors: Andreas Schaefer; Yvonne Schneeberger; Liesa Castro; Bjoern Sill; Yousuf Alassar; Meike Rybczynski; Markus J Barten; Hanno Grahn; Hermann Reichenspurner; Sebastian A Philipp; Alexander M Bernhardt Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2020-08-01