Literature DB >> 30233864

Assessment of adequacy of intraoperative nodal staging and factors influencing the lack of its compliance with recommendations in the surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Konrad Pawelczyk1, Piotr Blasiak1, Monika Szromek1, Katarzyna Nowinska2, Marek Marciniak1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate pathological status of lymph nodes sampled during resection of NSCLC determines prognosis and decides on further therapeutic actions. The areas of analysis are the factors affecting evaluation of pN accuracy, and the convergence of recommendations with actual intraoperative sampling of lymph nodes.
METHODS: The data of 3,215 patients with NSCLC consecutively operated with the intention of radical resection in 2007-2017, were analyzed. Accuracy of nodal sampling and influencing factors were compared with Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) guidelines, which recommend that to confirm pN0 status at least six lymph nodes/stations free of the disease must be removed. Three should be sampled from mediastinum (including subcarinal) and three from N1 stations.
RESULTS: A significant number of patients were found to have an adequate staging, especially after 2009, in terms of recommended quantity of nodes/nodal stations (P<0.0001). Age ≥64 (P=0.048), left side (P<0.0001), sublobar resection (P<0.0001), T1 tumors (P=0.019) are the factors affecting inadequacy of staging. Patients with inaccurate staging were found to have a considerably lower pN1 (7.2% vs.15.9%, P<0.001) and pN2 (9.7% vs.13.4%, P<0.001) status. Survival of patients with inadequate staging were found to be significantly worse (P=0.0002), which resulted in worse survival of those patients in stage I (P=0.00004), stage II (P=0.023) and stage III (P=0.031) of NSCLC.
CONCLUSIONS: UICC recommendations led to an increased adequacy of nodal sampling. The factors affecting insufficient number of sampled nodes include advanced age, left side, sublobar resections and T1 stage. Inaccuracy of intraoperative nodal staging results in incorrect prognosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); nodal sampling; staging adequacy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30233864      PMCID: PMC6129887          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  10 in total

1.  ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Didier Lardinois; Paul De Leyn; Paul Van Schil; Ramon Rami Porta; David Waller; Bernward Passlick; Marcin Zielinski; Toni Lerut; Walter Weder
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 2.  Towards optimal pathologic staging of resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Gail E Darling
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10

3.  Update: NCCN non-small cell lung cancer clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  David S Ettinger; Mark G Kris
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Adequacy of Intraoperative Nodal Staging during Surgical Resection of NSCLC: Influencing Factors and Its Relationship to Survival.

Authors:  Tim Edwards; Haval Balata; Mohamed Elshafi; Philip Foden; Paul Bishop; Eustace Fontaine; Mark Jones; Piotr Krysiak; Kandadai Rammohan; Rajesh Shah; Philip Crosbie; Richard Booton; Matthew Evison
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Survival After Sublobar Resection versus Lobectomy for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer: An Analysis from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Onkar V Khullar; Yuan Liu; Theresa Gillespie; Kristin A Higgins; Suresh Ramalingam; Joseph Lipscomb; Felix G Fernandez
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  European trends in preoperative and intraoperative nodal staging: ESTS guidelines.

Authors:  P De Leyn; D Lardinois; P Van Schil; R Rami-Porta; B Passlick; M Zielinski; D Waller; T Lerut; W Weder
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Audit of lymphadenectomy in lung cancer resections using a specimen collection kit and checklist.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Srishti Sareen; Ransome Eke; Xinhua Yu; Laura M McHugh; Kemp H Kernstine; Joe B Putnam; Edward T Robbins
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Pulmonary resection in patients aged 80 years or over with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic factors for overall survival and risk factors for postoperative complications.

Authors:  Jiro Okami; Masahiko Higashiyama; Hisao Asamura; Tomoyuki Goya; Yoshihiko Koshiishi; Yasunori Sohara; Kenji Eguchi; Masaki Mori; Yoichi Nakanishi; Ryosuke Tsuchiya; Etsuo Miyaoka
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer.

Authors:  Valerie W Rusch; Hisao Asamura; Hirokazu Watanabe; Dorothy J Giroux; Ramon Rami-Porta; Peter Goldstraw
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Determination of standard number, size and weight of mediastinal lymph nodes in postmortem examinations: reflection on lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sedat Ziyade; Nur Buyuk Pinarbasili; Nihan Ziyade; Osman Cemil Akdemir; Feyzi Sahin; Ömer Soysal; Alper Toker
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.637

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Mamdoh Al-Ameri; Erik Sachs; Ulrik Sartipy; Veronica Jackson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.