Literature DB >> 30233698

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy promotes osteochondral regeneration of knee joints in rabbits.

Hui Qi1,2, Shaofeng Jin1,2, Chunyang Yin3,4, Lei Chen1,2, Lei Sun1,2, Yajun Liu5.   

Abstract

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) has been proven to be effective for nonunion fractures. It was, thus, hypothesized that it may be used as a supplement therapy to promote osteochondral regeneration when combined with a scaffold previously prepared by our research group. In the present study, to verify this hypothesis, New Zealand white adult rabbits were anaesthetized and divided into three groups, as follows: Untreated control group, in which full-thickness cylindrical osteochondral defects were created without repairing; scaffold group, in which rabbits were implanted with the scaffolds; scaffold plus rESWT group, in which rabbits were implanted with scaffolds and then treated with rESWT at 2 weeks post-surgery. At 6 and 12 weeks after surgery, the animals were sacrificed. Nitric oxide (NO) levels in the synovial cavity of the knee joints were measured by the Griess method. In addition, macroscopic observation and the gross score according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) histological scoring system were determined. Histological evaluation was also performed by hematoxylin-eosin and Safranin O/fast green staining. The results demonstrated that both the scaffold and scaffold plus rESWT treatments significantly reduced NO levels in the synovial cavity at 6 weeks after surgery (P<0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed at 12 weeks after surgery. The ICRS scores of the scaffold and scaffold plus rESWT groups were significantly higher in comparison with those in the control group (P<0.05), and rESWT further increased these scores at 12 weeks after surgery (P<0.05). Histological results revealed that osteochondral regeneration was improved after treatment with scaffold or scaffold plus rESWT, with the latter displaying better results. These data suggested that rESWT improved the osteochondral regeneration when applied in combination with the scaffold, and that one of the underlying mechanisms may involve the reduction of NO in the synovial fluid. Therefore, rESWT may be a useful treatment for knee osteochondral regeneration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nitric oxide; osteochondral defects; radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30233698      PMCID: PMC6143895          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


Introduction

Articular cartilage tissue lacks blood supply and has a limited regeneration capacity. An osteochondral defect occurs when the subchondral bone is damaged due to abnormal mechanical loading (1–3). This type of defect is relatively common and notably reported in ~20% of all arthroscopic procedures (4), and if left untreated or treated incorrectly, osteoarthritis (OA) will occur. Patients develop pain, locking of the joint and/or other symptoms, which may lead to disability. Various methods have been reported for the treatment of osteochondral defects, including the marrow stimulation technique, osteochondral autograft/allograft transplantation and autologous chondrocyte implantation (1–3). Although the majority of methods have been proven to improve the symptoms for a certain period of time, long-term efficacy and physiological property recovery needs to be further examined (4–6). Our research group has previously fabricated and implanted three-dimensional porous scaffolds into osteochondral defects in rabbits (7–10). Although repair was observed, it was difficult for a single scaffold to meet the needs for reconstructing the cartilage and subchondral bone at the same time. Improved regenerative effects are still under evaluation. Two types of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) have been used in the musculoskeletal system, including focused ESWT (fESWT) and radial ESWT (rESWT) (11). A larger number of studies have been conducted on fESWT in the clinical setting and animal models, as opposed to rESWT (12). As wave patterns and tissue penetrating depth are different for fESWT and rESWT, corresponding effects are expected to vary (12) and further investigations are required. It has previously been reported that rESWT on tendinopathy can be more effective compared with other types of treatment, such as traditional physiotherapy and surgery (13), while its role in osteochondral defects remains incompletely understood. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that improved repair may be achieved when combining scaffold transplantation with rESWT. In the present study, a rabbit osteochondral defect model was used to assess the morphology of articular cartilage and subchondral bone according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) histological scoring system. Nitric oxide (NO) levels in the synovial cavity were measured, and histological sections were examined by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and Safranin O/fast green staining. By comparing these parameters among the untreated control, scaffold and scaffold plus rESWT groups, it was concluded that rESWT combined with the scaffold improved the osteochondral regeneration, which may be a result of the reduction of NO levels in the synovial fluid.

Materials and methods

Animal model

The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital (Beijing, China). A total of 15 male New Zealand White rabbits aged 5 months (mean weight, 2.7 kg; weight range, 2.5–2.9 kg) were obtained from Xinglong Experimental Animal Farm (Beijing, China). Animals were kept at 16–28°C with 40–70% humidity under a 12-h light/dark cycle with free access to food and water. Acclimatization for 7 days was allowed prior to experiments. Under anesthesia performed by injection of 0.1% pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg), a model of osteochondral defects was established. During the surgery, a hole was drilled with a 3.5-mm diameter (the diameter of the drill) and 2.21±0.24-mm depth in the weight-bearing osteochondral surface of the femoral condyle (Fig. 1). Surgery was performed in the bilateral knee joints of the rabbits; left knee joints were treated 12 weeks and right knee joints were treated for the last 6 weeks only. Rabbits (n=5) were assigned the following groups: Control group with osteochondral defects not receiving treatment; scaffold group with osteochondral defects treated with a porous scaffold implant, which was prepared by the authors from dermal tissues of a calf back following decellularization, reconstruction, cross-linking and surface-modification as described previously (7–10); and scaffold + rESWT group with osteochondral defects treated with a scaffold implant and rESWT.
Figure 1.

Osteochondral defect in the femoral condyle of a rabbit (top left) and the porous scaffold placed into the defect (top right) with suitable diameter (bottom left) and thickness (bottom right).

Shock wave treatment

Radial shock waves were applied using a STORZ device (STORZ Medical, Tägerwilen, Switzerland). At 2 weeks after surgery, rabbits in the scaffold plus rESWT group were anesthetized and then placed in a lateral position. A coupling gel was smeared to the skin surrounding the surgical area. The knee joint of each rabbit was subjected to 500 shock wave impulses at 1.5 bar every time (Fig. 2). Immediately after rESWT application, the knee joint was examined for swelling, ecchymosis or hematoma. All animals were sacrificed 12 weeks following the initial surgery.
Figure 2.

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on osteochondral defect of the rabbit.

NO quantification

Prior to euthanasia, the rabbits were anesthetized and the synovial cavity of knee joints was washed with 0.5 ml sterile saline. The synovial exudates were collected by aspiration and stored at −80°C prior to the assay. During the measurement, all samples were centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. Concentrations of NOX (nitrite/nitrate) in the synovial fluid were determined using a method based on the enzymatic conversion of nitrate to nitrite by nitrate reductase, followed by colorimetric detection of nitrite as an azo dye product of the Griess reaction (Molecular Probes; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, 130 µl deionized water, 150 µl of the sample and 20 µl Griess reagent were respectively added into each well of a 96-well plate, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The absorbance of each sample was then measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. The concentration of NOX was determined through the standard curve of nitrite concentration (1–100 µM) against the absorbance at 540 nm.

Macroscopic observation

The femoral condyles of rabbits in each group were observed without microscopic aid and images were captured with a Nikon D850 camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Macroscopic evaluation was conducted according to the ICRS scoring system (14). Briefly, the degree of defect repair, integration to border zone and macroscopic appearance were scored on a scale of 0–4; normal tissue achieves a score of 12.

Histological analyses

The femoral condyles were dissected into small sections, and the regenerated/defect part was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 3–4 days. Subsequently, the tissues were decalcified in 10% EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) for 28 days and sectioned into 4-µm slices. Sections were stained with conventional hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Sections were incubated with hematoxylin for 8–10 min and then 0.5% eosin for 20 sec, both at room temperature. Safranin O/fast green staining kit (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) was used to determine the extent of cartilage repair and observe the cartilaginous specific matrix secretion according to the manufacturer's instructions. All the procedures of Safranin O/fast green staining were performed at room temperature. Following dewaxing with xylene (3×10 min), sections were stained with Weigert solution for 3–5 min and washed with distilled water (2×1 min). After differentiation for 15 sec with acid differentiation solution, sections were incubated with fast green for 5 min and then into safranin O for 2 min. Each step was performed with 1 ml solutions followed by washing with distilled water (2×1 min). After staining with fast green and safranin O, sections were washed with a weak acid solution for 1–2 min to remove the residual stain, and then also washed with distilled water 2 times for 1 min. All the solutions were provided in the kit. Sections were then incubated into 95% alcohol and absolute ethanol for dehydration, each step was performed twice for a few seconds. Xylene was used for transparency prior to sealing the sections. Sections were analyzed using a light microscope (magnification, ×40). The normal cartilage matrix is positively stained by Safranin O (red), while the injury cartilage that is negatively stained is almost white or weakly red.

Statistical analyses

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard derivation. One-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc testing with Fisher's least significant difference was used to analyze experimental data with the IBM SPSS software (version 21.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). In the current study, statistically significant differences were indicated by P<0.05.

Results

rESWT leads to lower NOX concentrations in the synovial fluid

The total concentration of NOX, including nitrite and nitrate, in the synovial fluid was measured with the Griess method. NOX concentrations were significantly lower in the scaffold (19.2±3.0 µmol/l) and scaffold plus rESWT groups (18.8±4.0 µmol/l) as compared with the control group (25.8±3.1 µmol/l) at 6 weeks after surgery. However, no significant difference was detected among the three groups at 12 weeks after surgery (Table I).
Table I.

NO concentration in the synovial fluid (n=5).

NO concentration post-surgery (µmol/l)

Group6 weeks12 weeks
Control25.8±3.110.2±2.9
Scaffold19.2±3.0[a]8.0±1.4
Scaffold plus rESWT18.8±4.0[a]8.4±2.4

P<0.05 vs. the control group. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation. NO, nitric oxide; rESWT, radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy.

rESWT improves macroscopic osteochondral appearance

In order to identify whether rESWT helps promote osteochondral regeneration, the gross appearance of the three groups at 6 or 12 weeks after surgery was compared. Macroscopically, in the control group, the surface of the defect area was evidently lower in comparison with the normal tissue at 6 weeks after surgery. However, the scaffold and the scaffold plus rESWT groups exhibited marked improvement in osteochondral appearance after 6 and 12 weeks (Fig. 3A-F). The ICRS scores also revealed similar results (P<0.05; Fig. 4). Additionally, the scaffold plus rESWT group displayed much better repair characteristics after 12 weeks, but not after 6 weeks of surgery (Figs. 3E and F, and 4). All these results indicated a significant therapeutic effect of rESWT used in combination with the scaffold.
Figure 3.

Macroscopic observation subsequent to surgery. Representative images of the untreated control at (A) 6 weeks and (B) 12 weeks after surgery. Representative images of the group implanted with a scaffold at (C) 6 weeks and (D) 12 weeks after surgery. Representative images of the group implanted with a scaffold and then treated with radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, at (E) 6 weeks and (F) 12 weeks after surgery.

Figure 4.

ICRS scores at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs. untreated control group; †P<0.05 vs. scaffold group. ICRS, International Cartilage Repair Society; rESWT, radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy.

rESWT results in improved osteochondral regeneration

To determine the effect of rESWT on the osteochondral defect of knee joints, H&E staining was performed. As presented in Fig. 5, the defect area was covered by fibrous tissue both at week 6 and week 12 in the control group (Fig. 5A and B) and limited repair was observed in the scaffold group at 6 weeks following surgery when implanted with porous scaffold (Fig. 5C). A limited number of small rounded chondrocyte-type cells were detected beneath the defect area and at the interface with the normal tissue at 12 weeks following surgery (Fig. 5D). An increased number of rounded chondrocyte-type cells were detected and an increased cartilaginous-type surface area was presented by rESWT treatment group both at week 6 and week 12 (Fig. 5E and F). The results were further confirmed by Safranin O/fast green staining (Fig. 6). Safranin O/fast green staining was used to access the cartilage matrix content. The results exhibited that Safranin O staining was negative in the control group both at week 6 and week 12 (Fig. 6A and B) and weak-positive in the scaffold group, beneath the defect area and at the interface with the normal tissue both at week 6 and week 12 (Fig. 6C and D) and a limited number of small rounded chondrocyte-type cells were detected at 12 weeks following surgery (Fig. 6D). In the scaffold plus rESWT group, an increased amount of chondrocyte-type cells were observed. Safranin O staining was positive at week 6 (Fig. 6E) and a larger proportion of cartilaginous-matrix tissue was positively stained with Safranin O at week 12 (Fig. 6F).
Figure 5.

Hematoxylin-eosin staining following surgery. Representative images of the untreated control at (A) 6 weeks and (B) 12 weeks after surgery. Representative images of the scaffold group at (C) 6 weeks and (D) 12 weeks after surgery. Representative images of the scaffold and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy group at (E) 6 weeks and (F) 12 weeks after surgery (magnification, ×40). Arrows indicate chondrocyte-like cells.

Figure 6.

Safranin O/fast green staining following surgery. Representative images of the untreated control group at (A) 6 weeks and (B) 12 weeks after surgery. Representative images of the scaffold-implanted group at (C) 6 weeks and (D) 12 weeks after surgery. Representative images of the scaffold and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy group at (E) 6 weeks and (F) 12 weeks after surgery (magnification, ×40). Arrows indicate chondrocyte-like cells. Arrows indicate chondrocyte-like cells.

Discussion

Severe cartilage defects are often combined with the destruction of subchondral bone and are known as osteochondral defects. If left untreated, an osteochondral defect will gradually expand to the surrounding normal cartilage, causing OA (15). While a number of treatment options currently present good short-term functional restoration, the majority of the treatments result in fibrocartilage with inferior mechanical properties and diminished long-term durability (1,16). Therefore, to further improve the osteochondral regeneration, a combination of different methods is actively investigated currently (17). A scaffold is one of the three main components of tissue engineering, along with cells and growth factors (18,19). A porous scaffold was fabricated by our group and received a Chinese Invention Patent (patent no. ZL 2011 1 0099363.1) (7–10), was prepared from the dermal tissues of a calf back following decellularization, reconstruction, cross-linking and surface-modification. Although this scaffold promotes osteochondral regeneration, its effect was not fully satisfactory in terms of functional recovery. Previously, ESWT has been reported to serve an important role in treating a number of orthopedic injuries (20,21). The Food and Drug Administration of USA has approved ESWT for the treatment of proximal plantar fasciitis, and clinical trials of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow, calcific tendinitis of the shoulder and nonunion fractures (20,21). To date, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated the significant effect of ESWT on bone and tendon regeneration in animals and patients (13). There are also several studies reporting the therapeutic effect of ESWT on OA, osteochondritis dissecans or cartilage injury (22–25); however, the mechanisms underlying its effect remain largely unknown. In the present study, rESWT was used to treat osteochondral defects. Promising results were obtained in the scaffold plus rESWT group, compared with the scaffold group, as demonstrated by the higher ICRS scores and improved gross appearance, which were much more evident at 12 weeks after surgery. Nitric oxide (NO) is one of the main biological mediators under acoustic stimulation by shock waves (26). It has been confirmed that the systemic concentrations of NO increased at 1 month after ESWT was conducted for the treatment of on long bone nonunion (27). These results suggested the potential role of NO in ESWT. NO is important in OA progression and mediates the inflammatory responses. It is also involved in the apoptosis of chondrocytes, stimulation of matrix metalloproteinases, and degradation of collagen and proteoglycans (28–31). In the current study, NO levels in the synovial cavity were significantly reduced subsequent to treatment using a scaffold alone or scaffold plus rESWT at 6 weeks after surgery compared with the control group, while no significant difference was detected between the two groups. However, the mean value was lower when rESWT was used; since NO may serve a role in treatment with rESWT, further examination should be conducted in the future. Furthermore, the NO levels were not markedly different among the three groups at 12 weeks after surgery. This finding was not consistent with the observations of the study by Zhao et al (31), which mentioned that NO production was reduced in a rabbit OA model at 4 and 8 weeks after ESWT. The NO level in this previous OA model was markedly higher in comparison with that in the model of the present study. The discrepancy in these results may be due to the following reasons: Firstly, the OA model established in the previous study was induced by anterior cruciate ligament transaction, while the current study model was induced by drilling a hole in femoral condyle; secondly, the previous authors selected 4 and 8 weeks as the time points of NO detection, whereas 6 and 12 weeks were selected in the present study; thirdly, although rESWT was used in the two studies, different manufacturer, frequency and energy flux density may have caused different results; and finally, the use of a different method and kit may have also given rise to this discrepancy. NO is an important factor in osteochondral injury. It is routinely examined through quantification of the concentrations of nitrite/nitrate (NOX) using a method based on the enzymatic conversion of nitrate to nitrite facilitated by a nitrate reductase and followed by colorimetric detection of nitrite using a Griess reaction (32). As the detection procedure and incubation durations are not consistent between various laboratories, the concentrations of NOX will differ. Furthermore, several biomarkers have been reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of osteochondral injury or OA, such as prostaglandin E2 (33,34), and the results of the present study will be further verified using such biomarkers in the future. To further clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms, other effects of rESWT on chondrocytes in vitro will also be assessed. The current study observed that rESWT promoted osteochondral regeneration in rabbits, which may in part be due to the reduction of NO level in the synovial fluid in the knee joint; however, the exact molecular mechanisms remain unknown. In the present study, only a single dose was assessed and one treatment of rESWT was conducted; therefore, it is unclear whether other energy levels or multiple applications of rESWT have the same effect. The time point at which rESWT was conducted may also be an important factor, and certain researchers have suggested performing rESWT on knee OA prior to surgical treatment (25). Therefore, further in vitro and in vivo studies need to be conducted in the future, both basic and clinical, although the important role of rESWT on osteochondral regeneration is evident, and this strategy may serve as a valuable alternative supplement. In conclusion, due to inadequate blood supply and limited regeneration ability of cartilage, there is a lack of effective treatments for osteochondral defects. Emerging studies have revealed the excellent therapeutic efficacy of ESWT on bone regeneration. Similarly, the results of the present study indicated that rESWT combined with the use of a scaffold was able to improve osteochondral regeneration. At 6 weeks after surgery, NO levels in the scaffold and the scaffold plus rESWT groups were significantly reduced in the synovial cavity, whereas no significant difference was detected at 12 weeks after surgery. Furthermore, the ICRS scores and histological examination also revealed a much improved osteochondral regeneration following treatment with scaffold plus rESWT. These data suggest that rESWT improved osteochondral regeneration when combined with a scaffold and that it may be a useful treatment for osteochondral defects.
  31 in total

1.  Does extracorporeal shock wave therapy enhance healing of osteochondritis dissecans of the rabbit knee?: a pilot study.

Authors:  Roger Lyon; Xue Cheng Liu; Martin Kubin; Joseph Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Histological assessment of cartilage repair: a report by the Histology Endpoint Committee of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS).

Authors:  Pierre Mainil-Varlet; Thomas Aigner; Mats Brittberg; Peter Bullough; Anthony Hollander; Ernst Hunziker; Rita Kandel; Stefan Nehrer; Kenneth Pritzker; Sally Roberts; Edouard Stauffer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Scaffold-based cartilage treatments: with or without cells? A systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Elizaveta Kon; Alice Roffi; Giuseppe Filardo; Giulia Tesei; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Tissue Engineering Strategies for Osteochondral Repair.

Authors:  F Raquel Maia; Mariana R Carvalho; J Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 5.  Nitric oxide in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R Studer; D Jaffurs; M Stefanovic-Racic; P D Robbins; C H Evans
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 6.  Nitric oxide and bone.

Authors:  D M Evans; S H Ralston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  A review on gradient hydrogel/fiber scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration.

Authors:  Sajedeh Khorshidi; Akbar Karkhaneh
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 8.  Cartilage failures. Systematic literature review, critical survey analysis, and definition.

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Luca Andriolo; Federica Balboni; Maurilio Marcacci; Elizaveta Kon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 10.  Nitric oxide in inflammation and pain associated with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Steven B Abramson
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Effects of the Exposure of Musculoskeletal Tissue to Extracorporeal Shock Waves.

Authors:  Tobias Wuerfel; Christoph Schmitz; Leon L J Jokinen
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Improved Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer upon Oxygenation Therapeutics through Oxygen-Loading Nanoperfluorocarbon Triggered by Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave.

Authors:  Shunhao Wang; Chunyang Yin; Xiaoguang Han; Anyi Guo; Xiaodong Chen; Sijin Liu; Yajun Liu
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 6.543

3.  Nanoscale perfluorocarbon expediates bone fracture healing through selectively activating osteoblastic differentiation and functions.

Authors:  Shunhao Wang; Jiahuang Qiu; Anyi Guo; Ruanzhong Ren; Wei He; Sijin Liu; Yajun Liu
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 10.435

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.