| Literature DB >> 30233691 |
Xian Wang1, Hongmei Li1, Xiaoting Sun1, Xiaohang Wang1, Gangyin Wang1.
Abstract
This study explored drug release from paclitaxel + hirudin-eluting balloons in a healthy pig coronary artery model and objectively evaluated the vascular reactivity after balloon intervention. A total of 12 healthy white pigs were used for the analysis of drug release from the experimental balloon. The observational time-points included immediately following implantation and day 7, 30, and 180 after surgery. At each time-point, two pigs were treated with the paclitaxel + hirudin-eluting balloon and one with the B. Braun paclitaxel-eluting balloon (control). Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) of the target vessel was performed before and after balloon treatment. One pig died before the designated experimental endpoint, and no abnormal clinical signs or tissue lesions were observed in the other pigs. QCA showed different degrees of spasms after balloon treatment, all of which recovered shortly thereafter without intervention. The blood vessel lumens were all open and without dissection or angioma. Drug content determination showed that the experimental balloon performed better than the control balloon with regard to drug release, vascular absorption and expulsion rate. The paclitaxel + hirudin-eluting balloon catheter was easy to manipulate. The drug release from the experimental balloon was stable and resulted in good vascular reactivity. The safety and efficacy of the experimental balloon were not worse than the paclitaxel-eluting balloon that is currently on the market.Entities:
Keywords: coronary artery invention; drug release; drug-eluting balloon; restenosis; vascular reactivity
Year: 2018 PMID: 30233691 PMCID: PMC6143913 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Treatment procedures. (A) Animal preparation. (B) Anaesthesia and venous puncture. (C) Separation of the coronary artery. (D) Right coronary arteriography and selection of the inflation section. (E) Left coronary arteriography and selection of the inflation section.
QCA outcomes at different time-points.
| Groups | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balloon | Post-operative time (days) | Balloon QCA | Balloon/artery ratio | MLD before balloon treatment (mm) | MLD after balloon treatment (mm) | MLD at the time of follow-up (mm) | Stenosis rate (%) |
| Control | 7 | 3±0.2 | 1.1±0.0 | 2.8±0.2 | 2.3±0.4 | 2.3±0.2 | 18.2±1.6 |
| Experimental | 7 | 3±0.2 | 1.2±0.0[ | 2.6±0.1 | 2.4±0.2 | 2.3±0.3 | 11.1±10.7[ |
| Control | 30 | 2.8±0.2[ | 1.2±0.1[ | 2.4±0.3 | 2.2±0.1 | 2.3±0.4 | 4.4±8.9[ |
| Experimental | 30 | 2.8±0.1[ | 1.2±0.0[ | 2.4±0.2 | 1.9±0.2 | 2.1±0.3 | 9.9±12.4[ |
| Control | 180 | 2.8±0.2[ | 1.1±0.0 | 2.5±0.2 | 2.0±0.2 | 2.5±0.3 | −1.7±13.5[ |
| Experimental | 180 | 2.7±0.0[ | 1.1±0.0 | 2.5±0.2 | 2.0±0.2 | 2.5±0.3 | −1.7±13.5[ |
P<0.05 vs. the 7-day control
P<0.05 vs. the control at the same time-point. MLD, minimal intravascular lumen diameter of the treated vessel segment; balloon QCA, the maximal diameter of the transported balloon during treatment; balloon/artery ratio, balloon QCA/the MLD before treatment; stenosis rate, (MLD after treatment-MLD at the time of follow-up)/(the MLD after treatment) ×100. QCA, quantitative coronary angiography.
Figure 2.Comparison of the QCA outcomebetween the control and experimental groups at different time-points after treatment. (A) Balloon QCA: The maximum diameter of the balloon delivered during balloon treatment. Compared between the two groups, there is no difference in the vascular treatment lumen of the balloon. (B) MLD: minimum vascular lumen diameter. QCA/MLD refers to the treated vessel diameter/minimum vascular lumen diameter. When the restenosis occurs, the diameter of the smallest vascular lumen decreases, and the whole ratio increases. The larger the QCA/MLD, the more severe the restenosis. The comparison between the two groups showed that the degree of restenosis in the experimental group was less severe than that in the control group in the early stage (7 days) after intervention, which was an indirect method for determining the degree of restenosis. (C) As a direct method to judge the degree of restenosis, the restenosis rate of the two groups was compared. (D) After balloon treatment. MLD: diameter of the artery balloon segment, indicating no difference in lumen diameter immediately after treatment. *P<0.05 vs. the control group at day 7. QCA, quantitative coronary angiography.
Paclitaxel content in the coronary wall.
| Groups | Postoperative time-point (days) | Sample section | Paclitaxel concentration (ng/g) | Total content of paclitaxel (ng) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Instant | Control | 6,250 | 65,000 | 8,360 | 338 | 2,509 | 487 |
| Treated | 534,000 | 293,000 | 108,000 | 19,544 | 7,735 | 3,629 | ||
| Experimental | Instant | Control | 47,600 | 28,300 | 21,000 | 2,675 | 849 | 903 |
| Treated | 605,000 | 167,000 | 196,000 | 2,509 | 487 | 31,823 | ||
| Experimental | Instant | Control | 10,400 | 13,300 | 6,060 | 924 | 871 | 496 |
| Treated | 56,300 | 410,000 | 137,000 | 2,871 | 14,883 | 6,713 | ||
| Control | 7 | Control | 56.7 | 52.0 | 61.8 | 2.98 | 1.46 | 2.04 |
| Treated | 23,000 | 16,400 | 22,200 | 736 | 531 | 571 | ||
| Experimental | 7 | Control | 259 | 399 | 64.8 | 8.88 | 11.6 | 1.83 |
| Treated | 36,900 | 38,000 | 5,510 | 1,524 | 1,041 | 147 | ||
| Experimental | 7 | Control | 35.2 | 1,150 | 201 | 0.901 | 15 | 4.82 |
| Treated | 14,600 | 40,100 | 5,810 | 283 | 1,528 | 97.6 | ||
| Control | 30 | Control | 0 | 103 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6.73 |
| Treated | 0 | 2,820 | 1,400 | 0 | 69.7 | 51.1 | ||
| Experimental | 30 | Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treated | 0 | 161 | 588 | 2 | 6.73 | 13.8 | ||
| Experimental | 30 | Control | 0 | 913 | 0 | 0 | 26.3 | 0 |
| Treated | 291 | 31.5 | 264 | 10.2 | 0.488 | 5.65 | ||
| Control | 180 | Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treated | 21.8 | 0 | 39.0 | 0.953 | 0 | 1.53 | ||
| Experimental | 180 | Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treated | 38 | 27.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Figure 3.The paclitaxel content in the vascular wall at different time-points. *P<0.05, compared with the control group at different time-points.
Paclitaxel content in blood.
| Paclitaxel concentration (ng/ml) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Postoperative time (days) | Blood-sampling time | RCA | LCA | LAD |
| Control | Instant | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 2.28 | 6.86 | 3.92 | ||
| Experimental | Instant | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 0 | 0 | 2.91 | ||
| Experimental | Instant | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 2.04 | 3.99 | 2.57 | ||
| Control | 7 | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 2.05 | 0 | 5.01 | ||
| Experimental | 7 | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 7.97 | 3.93 | 2.95 | ||
| Experimental | 7 | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 4.74 | 3.77 | 2.09 | ||
| Control | 30 | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Experimental | 30 | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Experimental | 30 | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 3.86 | 4.56 | 4.04 | ||
| Control | 180 | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Experimental | 180 | Before treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| After treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
RCA, right coronary artery; LCA, left coronary artery; LAD, left anterior descending artery.
Figure 4.Paclitaxel content in blood at different time-points. *P<0.05, compared with the control group at different time-points.