| Literature DB >> 30233615 |
Martin B Nadeau1, Joan Laur2, Damase P Khasa3.
Abstract
In the context of a phytorestoration project, the purpose of this study was to assess the respective contribution to the nutritional status ofEntities:
Keywords: Picea glauca; land reclamation; mine waste; mycorrhizae; nutrition; rhizobacteria; toxicity
Year: 2018 PMID: 30233615 PMCID: PMC6130232 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01268
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
White spruce seedlings growth and health-related parameters affected by tailing type.
| Waste rocks | Fine tailings | |
|---|---|---|
| Needle dry biomass (mg) | 33.9 ± 0.8a | 27.2 ± 0.9b |
| Stem dry biomass (mg) | 7.9 ± 0.2a | 6.6 ± 0.2b |
| Stem length (mm) | 24.2 ± 0.3a | 21.7 ± 0.3b |
| Root dry biomass (mg) | 51 ± 1.4a | 44.7 ± 1.4b |
| Total root length (mm) | 214.2 ± 5a | 186 ± 4.9b |
| Total root area (mm2) | 29.2 ± 0.8a | 24.7 ± 0.7b |
| Total root volume (mm3) | 0.32 ± 0.01a | 0.27 ± 0.01b |
| Dark red foliage (%) | 13.9 ± 1.3b | 18.1 ± 1.4a |
| Root water content (%) | 77.6 ± 0.4a | 76.2 ± 0.4b |
| Shoot water content (%) | 48.4 ± 0.3b | 51 ± 0.3a |
Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and their associated p-values calculated for physiological parameters and the measured root and needle nutrition variables.
| Root concentration | Needle concentration | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Fe | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Fe | ||
| Concentration range (g/kg) observed in healthy seedlings ( | 12–15 | 1–2 | 3–10 | 2–5 | 1–2 | 5.10-3–0.01 | 12–15 | 1–2 | 3–10 | 2–5 | 1–2 | 5.10-3–0.01 | |
| Concentration range (g/kg) measured | 0.5–2 | 3–9 | 0.4–3 | 1–2.8 | |||||||||
| Root dry | r | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.04 | |||||||||
| biomass | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | ||||||||
| Stem dry | r | 0.1 | 0.06 | ||||||||||
| biomass | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | ||||||||
| Needle dry | r | 0.03 | 0.01 | ||||||||||
| biomass | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | |||||||||
| Total root length | r | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.17 | |||||||||
| 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.8 | |||||||||
| Plant height | r | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.06 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.9 | ||||||||||
| Dark red | r | 0.01 | 0.12 | ||||||||||
| foliage (%) | 0.0937 | 0.4841 | 0.8893 | 0.1435 | 0.0903 | 0.1691 | |||||||
| Healthy green | 0.16 | 0.1 | 0.11 | ||||||||||
| foliage (%) | 0.0627 | 0.2487 | 0.22320.01 | 0.14160.12 | 0.0197 | ||||||||
| Dark red foliage (%) | 0.0937 | 0.4841 | 0.8893 | 0.1435 | 0.0903 | 0.1691 | |||||||
Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and their associated p-values calculated for the proportion of root tips colonized by different fungi and measured root and needle nutrition variables.
| Root content | Needle content | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Fe | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Fe | ||
| 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.05 | |||||||||||
| 0.0942 | 0.1156 | 0.2426 | 0.4354 | 0.0764 | 0.7959 | 0.5308 | 0.5217 | 0.6092 | |||||
| 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.25 | ||||||||||
| 0.2448 | 0.7757 | 0.2048 | 0.207 | 0.8268 | 0.8905 | 0.4071 | 0.1705 | 0.5419 | 0.0966 | ||||
| 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.33 | |||||||||||
| 0.1567 | 0.0594 | 0.1957 | 0.2744 | 0.0661 | 0.3384 | 0.2369 | 0.1357 | 0.1097 | |||||