Literature DB >> 30233569

Immunoadsorption of Desmoglein-3-Specific IgG Abolishes the Blister-Inducing Capacity of Pemphigus Vulgaris IgG in Neonatal Mice.

Maxi Hofrichter1, Jenny Dworschak2, Shirin Emtenani1, Jana Langenhan2, Fanny Weiß1, Lars Komorowski2, Detlef Zillikens3, Winfried Stöcker2, Christian Probst2, Enno Schmidt1,3, Stephanie Goletz1.   

Abstract

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a potentially life-threatening autoimmune blistering disease which is associated with autoantibodies directed against two desmosomal proteins, desmoglein (Dsg) 3 and 1. Treatment of PV is rather challenging and relies on the long-term use of systemic corticosteroids and additional immunosuppressants. More recently, autoantibody-depleting therapies such as rituximab, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins, and immunoadsorption were shown to be valuable treatment options in PV. Specific removal of pathogenic autoantibodies would further increase efficacy and usability of immunoadsorption. Here, we tested the capacity of our recently developed prototypic Dsg1- and Dsg3-specific adsorbers to remove circulating pathogenic autoantibodies from three different PV patients. The pathogenic potential of the Dsg3/1-depleted IgG fractions and the anti-Dsg3-specific IgG was explored in two different in vitro assays based on cultured human keratinocytes, the desmosome degradation assay and the dispase-based dissociation assay. In addition, the neonatal mouse model of PV was used. In both in vitro assays, no difference between the pathogenic effect of total PV IgG and anti-Dsg3-specific IgG was seen, while Dsg3/1-depleted and control IgG were not pathogenic. For the samples of all 3 PV patients, depletion of anti-Dsg3/1 IgG resulted in a complete loss of pathogenicity when injected into neonatal mice. In contrast, injection of anti-Dsg3-specific IgG, eluted from the column, induced gross blistering in the mice. Our data clearly show that anti-Dsg3-specific IgG alone is pathogenic in vitro and in vivo, whereas Dsg3/1-depletion results in a complete loss of pathogenicity. Furthermore, our data suggest that Dsg-specific adsorption may be a suitable therapeutic modality to efficiently reduce pathogenic autoantibodies in patients with severe PV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acantholysis; autoantibody; desmoglein; desmosome; immunoadsorption; pemphigus; skin; treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30233569      PMCID: PMC6130267          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a potentially life-threatening intraepidermal blistering autoimmune disease (1–4). Desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) and desmoglein 1 (Dsg1) have been identified as autoantigens in PV (5–8). Dsg1 and Dsg3 are desmosomal transmembrane cadherins that mediate intercellular adhesion of keratinocytes in the skin and surface-close epithelia (3, 6, 9). In PV patients with exclusive mucosal involvement (mPV), autoantibodies are restricted to Dsg3, whereas autoantibodies against both Dsg3 and Dsg1 are associated with skin and mucosal lesions (mucocutaneous type of PV, mcPV) (10–12). In pemphigus foliaceus (PF), autoantibody reactivity is limited to Dsg1 and patients only develop skin lesions. In addition to Dsg1 and Dsg3, a variety of other target antigens have been described in PV including muscarinic and nicotinic acethylcholine receptors, annexins, thyroid peroxidase, desmocollins, and mitochondrial proteins (13–15). While good, albeit not undisputed, evidence for the pathogenic effect of anti-Dsg1/3 antibodies has been provided, less data were reported about the pathogenicity of non-Dsg antibodies (13, 15–20). Treatment of PV is challenging and has required the long-term use of prednisolone and other immunosuppressants such as azathioprine and mycophenoles (4, 21, 22). Very recently, first-line rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody that depletes B cells from the circulation for 3–9 months, in conjunction with the short term use of prednisolone has been shown to be significantly more effective and safe compared to the long term use of prednisolone alone (23). High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and immunoadsorption are two other treatment modalities that reduce serum anti-Dsg autoantibodies and are recommended in refractory and/or severely affected PV patients (21, 22, 24). The reduction of serum autoantibodies in PV appears to be a particularly attractive therapeutic approach since the direct pathogenic importance of pemphigus autoantibodies has been shown in various experimental settings in vitro and in vivo (13, 25). Whereas plasmapheresis requires substitution with fresh-frozen plasma or human albumin, immunoadsorption specifically removes antibodies from the circulation (24). Unfortunately, the use of immunoadsorption is limited by the increased risk of infections due to the parallel reduction of protective immunoglobulins. Thus, removal of Dsg-specific antibodies appeared to be advantageous leading to the recent development of prototypic anti-Dsg1 and anti-Dsg3 adsorbers. The Dsg1/3-specific adsorbers are based on the recombinant Dsg ectodomains coupled to sepharose and allowed the effective removal of anti-Dsg reactivity from PV and PF serum samples in vitro (26). The aim of the present study was to show that by the use of the Dsg1/3-specific adsorbers removal of anti-Dsg antibodies from PV sera is sufficient to abolish the pathogenic effect of pemphigus IgG not only in vitro but also in vivo in neonatal mice. We now also show that anti-Dsg3-specific IgG is sufficient for acantholysis in cultured keratinocytes and blister formation in neonatal mice.

Material and methods

Patients

IgG from 3 PV patients (PV1, PV2, PV3) that were treated with conventional protein A immunoadsorption at the Department of Dermatology, Lübeck, was used (27, 28). The clinical phenotype, age, sex, indirect immunofluorescence (IF) serum titers on monkey esophagus, and anti-Dsg1/3 IgG serum levels by ELISA (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany) are shown in Table 1. IgG bound to protein A was eluted by glycine buffer (pH 2.8) and immediately neutralized with 1M Tris pH 9.0 followed by precipitation with ammonium sulfate and dialysis against PBS. As no immunoadsorption material from healthy donors is available, we use affinity-purified IgG from sera of healthy volunteers as control. The study was performed following the Declaration of Helsinki. Pathogenicity experiments were positively reviewed by the ethics committees of the University of Lübeck, Germany (file reference, 09-090).
Table 1

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patients' characteristics.

Patient no.SexAge (years)Clinical phenotypeMonkey esophagus (serum)Anti-Dsg1 serum level (U/ml)Anti-Dsg3 serum level (U/ml)
PV1M70mcPV1:2,5601,0453,572
PV2M44mcPV1:1,2801039,748
PV3F72mPV1:3206,001

mcPV, mucocutaneous PV; mPV, mucosal PV.

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patients' characteristics. mcPV, mucocutaneous PV; mPV, mucosal PV.

Affinity purification of Dsg-specific PV IgG using the entire ectodomain of Dsg3 Dsg1

For antigen-specific immunoaffinity purification of anti-Dsg3 and anti-Dsg1 IgG, the entire ectodomains of Dsg3 and Dsg1, respectively, were immobilized on N-hydroxysuccinimide-activated Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) as previously described (26). Immunoaffinity purifications were performed as follows. The immobilized protein matrix was transferred into microcentrifuge spin columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) and washed three times with tris-buffered saline supplemented with 5 mM CaCl2 (Ca2+-TBS). The concentrated IgG of the PV patients was diluted 1:1 with Ca2+-TBS and incubated with the immobilized protein for 30 min at room temperature. The flow-through fraction was collected by centrifugation at 500x g for 30 s. After several washing steps with Ca2+-TBS (until OD280 < 0.05) the anti-Dsg3 and anti-Dsg1 IgG fractions were eluted from the matrix with IgG elution buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) until the OD280 was below 0.05, and immediately neutralized with 1M Tris pH 9.0. All eluted fractions were pooled and buffer was exchanged to PBS using Vivaspin 500 centrifugal filter units (Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany). Finally, Dsg3/1-depleted PV IgG (flow-through fractions) and anti-Dsg3 PV IgG (eluted fractions) were analyzed for anti-Dsg3 and anti-Dsg1 autoantibody reactivity by ELISA (Euroimmun).

Immunoblotting with HaCaT extract

HaCaT cells were grown in low calcium Keratinocyte Growth Medium 2, KGM2 (Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) containing 0.06 mM CaCl2 to confluence and lysed in Laemmli sample buffer. Lysates were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted as reported (29). After blocking, nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with anti-Dsg3 specific IgG (2 μg/ml), a monoclonal anti-Dsg3 antibody (1:100, Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany), control IgG (2 μg/ml) from a healthy donor and IVIg (2 μg/ml, Biotest, Dreieich, Germany) diluted in TBST containing 5% skimmed milk powder plus 1% BSA. As secondary antibodies a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated polyclonal goat anti-human IgG antibody (1:1,000, DAKO, Hamburg, Germany,) and a polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse IgG antibody (1:1,000; DAKO) were used. The proteins were visualized using Super Signal West Femto (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Desmosome degradation assay

The desmosome degradation assay was performed as described previously (26, 30, 31). In brief, HaCaT cells were grown in 8-well chamber slides (BDBiosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) to confluent monolayers. Low calcium Keratinocyte Growth Medium 2, KGM2 (Promocell) containing 0.06 mM CaCl2 was changed to high calcium medium by adding sterile 0.15 M CaCl2 to a final concentration of 1.5 mM calcium. Monolayers were treated with PV IgG, control IgG and IgG fractions collected from Dsg3 and Dsg1 immunoaffinity purification as indicated in the results part. After 24 h incubation at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere, culture medium was removed and monolayers were washed with DPBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and subsequently fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. After washing, monolayers were treated with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), incubated with 10% normal goat serum (DAKO) plus 1% BSA (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and then with mouse anti-human Dsg3 IgG1 (1:100 in PBS, clone 5G11; Acris, Herford, Germany) for 30 min at 37°C and after three times washing with Cy3-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (1:100 in PBS; Dianova, Hamburg, Germany). Slides were mounted with ProLong R Gold antifade reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) and examined microscopically (BZ-9000, Keyence, Neu-Isenburg, Germany).

Dispase-based dissociation assay

The assay was performed as reported previously (26, 30–32) with minor modifications. In brief, HaCaT cells were cultivated in 12-well-plates (Greiner Bio-One, Solingen, Germany) with KGM2 (Promocell) containing 0.06 mM CaCl2 in a humidified atmosphere (5 CO2) at 37°C. At confluence, fresh KGM2 containing 1.5 mM CaCl2 was added. PV IgG (2 mg/mL), control IgG (2 mg/mL), anti-Dsg3-specific IgG fractions collected from Dsg3- and Dsg1-specific affinity purification (20 μg/mL) and anti-Dsg3/1-depleted IgG (2 mg/mL), respectively were added and incubated for 24 h. Subsequently, the cells were treated with dispase solution (2.5 U/ml for 30 min; Stemcell Techn., Vancouver, Canada) and subjected to mechanical stress by pipetting 10 times (5 times moderate, 5 times strong) with a 1 ml pipette. Cell fragments were fixed and stained with crystal violet (Sigma Aldrich). Photos were taken from each well and cell fragments were counted manually. Every experiment was performed at least in triplicate.

Passive transfer neonatal mouse model

Neonatals from C57BL/6 mice (Charles River Laboratories, Sulzfeld, Germany) were injected subcutaneously <24 h after birth with the respective PV IgG fraction at doses of 3–7 mg/g of total and anti-Dsg3/1-depleted IgG and 300 μg/g anti-Dsg3-specific IgG (each IgG batch was applied in 3 mice) with or without exfoliative toxin A (ETA; Toxin Technology Inc., Sarasota, USA) as described in parts previously (33, 34). ETA is a serine protease produced from Staphylococcus aureus which specifically degrades Dsg1 (35). Due to the different expression patterns of Dsg1 and Dsg3 in mucous membranes and the skin, anti-Dsg3 IgG is only pathogenic in the skin when Dsg1 is graded concomitantly (either by anti-Dsg1 IgG or ETA). In contrast, in mucous membranes, anti-Dsg3 antibodies alone are sufficient to induce intraepithelial splitting (12). Here, half of the minimum ETA dose was applied that in preliminary experiments had induced clinical blistering (usually 0.1 μg/g bodyweight). After 16–24 h, the mice were clinically evaluated before and after application of mechanical stress at the back and sides of mice (Nikolsky phenomenon). Blood was obtained as well as biopsies from the back for histopathology (H&E staining) and direct IF microscopy. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Rights Commission of the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment, Schleswig Holstein (98-8/14).

Immunofluorescence microscopy

For direct IF microscopy, a polyclonal rabbit anti-human IgG-FITC antibody (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) at a dilution of 1:50 in PBS was used for 1 h at room temperature. For indirect IF microscopy, 6 μm sections of monkey esophagus were incubated with human IgG and mouse sera in a dilution range of 1:20–1:5120 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. For detection, a FITC-labeled polyclonal anti-human IgG (DAKO) at 1:50 in PBS was employed for 30 min at room temperature.

Statistics

Graphpad Prism 6 was used for the statistical analysis. The dispase assay data across different groups within each patient was compared for its statistical significance using the Kruskal-Wallis test. For all three patients, correction for multiple comparisons was done by post-hoc Dunn's tests to identify significant pairwise differences between the groups.

Results

Dsg1- and Dsg3-specific adsorption of PV patient IgG

Anti-Dsg3-specific IgG was immunoadsorbed from total PV IgG in all three PV patients as previously described in Langenhan et al. (26). In addition, in PV1 and PV2, the present Dsg1-reactivity was removed by Dsg1-specific immunoadsorption. To study the effect of Dsg-specific IgG we focused on anti-Dsg3-specific IgG since only two of the three PV patients revealed Dsg1-specifc IgG. Characteristics of patient IgG after Dsg3/1-specific adsorption are summarized in Tables 2, 3. Western blot analysis of cellular extracts of cultured human keratinocytes confirmed the specific purification of anti-Dsg3 PV IgG (Figure 1). Indirect IF microscopy on monkey esophagus revealed that total IgG from PV patients as well as Dsg3-specific IgG, but not Dsg3/1-depleted IgG and control IgG from a healthy blood donor, showed the PV-typical intercellular staining of the stratified squamous epithelium (Figure 2, Table 2).
Table 2

Characteristics of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG fractions.

Patient no.PV IgGaPurified anti-Dsg3 PV IgGAnti-Dsg3/1 depleted PV IgG
Dsg3 (U/ml)bDsg1 (U/ml)bIIF (titer)cDsg3 (U/ml)bDsg1 (U/ml)bIIF (titer)cDsg3 (U/ml)bDsg1 (U/ml)bIIF (titer)c
PV149,44616,933>1:5,1209,463Neg.1:640Neg.Neg.Neg.
PV229,52627>1:5,12019,034Neg.1:1,280Neg.Neg.Neg.
PV311,773Neg.>1:5,1201,691Neg.1:320Neg.Neg.Neg.

Before subjection to Dsg-specific adsorption.

By ELISA (Euroimmun; lower cut-off 20 U/ml).

By indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) microscopy on monkey esophagus. Dsg, desmoglein; neg., negative.

Table 3

Characteristics of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG fractions (dispase-based dissociation assay).

Patient no.PV IgGaPurified anti-Dsg3 PV IgGAnti-Dsg3/1 depleted PV IgG
Dsg3 (U/ml)bDsg1 (U/ml)bDsg3 (U/ml)bDsg1 (U/ml)bDsg3 (U/ml)bDsg1 (U/ml)b
PV11,77644139Neg.Neg.Neg.
PV23,217Neg.1,446Neg.Neg.Neg.
PV32,274Neg.752Neg.Neg.Neg.

Before subjection to Dsg-specific adsorption.

By ELISA (Euroimmun; lower cut-off 20 U/ml).

Dsg, desmoglein; neg., negative.

Figure 1

Desmoglein3-specific IgG reactivity in Western blot using extract of cultured keratinocytes. Western blotting of a monoclonal anti-Dsg3 antibody (lane 1; Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany), Dsg3-specific IgG (2 μg/ml) from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patient PV1 (lane 2), PV2 (lane 3), and PV3 (lane 4) with extract of cultured HaCaT keratinocytes. IgG affinity purified from a healthy volunteer (2 μg/ml) and IVIg (2 μg/ml, Biotest, Dreieich, Germany) are shown in lanes 5 and 6. Molecular weight markers are shown to the left (kDa). The arrow indicates the migration position of desmoglein 3.

Figure 2

Indirect immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy on monkey esophagus confirms Dsg3/1-specific depletion of IgG from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG. Total PV IgG from three different pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patients (PV1 (A), PV2 (D), PV3 (G)) and the respective anti-Dsg3-specific IgG (B,E,H) but not the anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted IgG fractions (C,F,I) and normal human IgG (NH IgG; J) revealed the characteristic intercellular epithelial staining. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI.

Characteristics of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG fractions. Before subjection to Dsg-specific adsorption. By ELISA (Euroimmun; lower cut-off 20 U/ml). By indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) microscopy on monkey esophagus. Dsg, desmoglein; neg., negative. Characteristics of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG fractions (dispase-based dissociation assay). Before subjection to Dsg-specific adsorption. By ELISA (Euroimmun; lower cut-off 20 U/ml). Dsg, desmoglein; neg., negative. Desmoglein3-specific IgG reactivity in Western blot using extract of cultured keratinocytes. Western blotting of a monoclonal anti-Dsg3 antibody (lane 1; Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany), Dsg3-specific IgG (2 μg/ml) from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patient PV1 (lane 2), PV2 (lane 3), and PV3 (lane 4) with extract of cultured HaCaT keratinocytes. IgG affinity purified from a healthy volunteer (2 μg/ml) and IVIg (2 μg/ml, Biotest, Dreieich, Germany) are shown in lanes 5 and 6. Molecular weight markers are shown to the left (kDa). The arrow indicates the migration position of desmoglein 3. Indirect immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy on monkey esophagus confirms Dsg3/1-specific depletion of IgG from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG. Total PV IgG from three different pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patients (PV1 (A), PV2 (D), PV3 (G)) and the respective anti-Dsg3-specific IgG (B,E,H) but not the anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted IgG fractions (C,F,I) and normal human IgG (NH IgG; J) revealed the characteristic intercellular epithelial staining. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI.

Dsg3/1-specific depletion of PV IgG abolishes pathogenicity in vitro

To evaluate the pathogenicity of the Dsg3-specific PV IgG and anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted fractions in vitro, the desmosome degradation assay and the dispase-based dissociation assay were performed. The PV IgG-induced loss of Dsg3 expression on the keratinocyte cell surface due to internalization of Dsg3 into endosomes and degradation was determined microscopically. Incubation of HaCaT cell monolayers with either total PV patient IgG or anti-Dsg3-specific IgG resulted in an equivalent discontinuous Dsg3 staining at the keratinocyte cell borders (Figure 3). In contrast, when cells were treated with anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted fractions and normal human IgG, respectively, Dsg3 staining was uniformly localized to the cell membrane of keratinocytes (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Desmosome degradation assay. HaCaT keratinocytes were treated with 50 μg/ml total pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG, 5 μg/ml anti-Dsg3-specific and 50 μg/ml anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted PV IgG from three different pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patients (PV1, PV2, PV3) before immunostaining with anti-Dsg3 IgG. Dsg3 degradation was detected after incubation with total PV IgG (A,D,G) and Dsg3-specific IgG (B,E,H) but not with the PV IgG fractions depleted of anti-Dsg1/3 IgG (C,F,I) and normal human IgG (50 μg/ml; NH IgG; J).

Desmosome degradation assay. HaCaT keratinocytes were treated with 50 μg/ml total pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG, 5 μg/ml anti-Dsg3-specific and 50 μg/ml anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted PV IgG from three different pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patients (PV1, PV2, PV3) before immunostaining with anti-Dsg3 IgG. Dsg3 degradation was detected after incubation with total PV IgG (A,D,G) and Dsg3-specific IgG (B,E,H) but not with the PV IgG fractions depleted of anti-Dsg1/3 IgG (C,F,I) and normal human IgG (50 μg/ml; NH IgG; J). In the dispase-based dissociation assay, treatment with PV1, PV2, and PV3 IgG, respectively, as expected resulted in significantly more keratinocyte fragments compared to incubation with normal human IgG (PV1: p = 0.0011; PV2: p = 0.0045; PV3: p = 0.003; Figure 4). Incubation of monolayers with purified Dsg3-specific PV IgG from the three patients generated a significantly higher fragmentation level compared to incubation with anti-Dsg3/1-depleted IgG (PV1: p = 0.046; PV2: p = 0.011; PV3: p = 0.02; Figure 4). No difference was observed between treatment with anti-Dsg3/1-depleted IgG and normal human IgG (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Dispase-based dissociation assay. Incubation of keratinocyte monolayers with total pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG and anti-Dsg3-specific IgG from three different PV patients (PV1, PV2, PV3) showed a significantly higher fragmentation compared to treatment with normal human IgG (NH IgG) and the anti-Dsg3/1-depleted PV IgG (Dsg-depl. IgG), respectively. No difference between incubation with NH IgG and anti-Dsg3/1-depleted IgG was observed. In addition, incubation with Dsg3-specific IgG resulted in significantly higher fragmentations compared to both Dsg-depleted PV IgG and NH IgG, respectively. Data show the mean and standard error of the mean (error bars) of seven independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; n.s., not significant.

Dispase-based dissociation assay. Incubation of keratinocyte monolayers with total pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG and anti-Dsg3-specific IgG from three different PV patients (PV1, PV2, PV3) showed a significantly higher fragmentation compared to treatment with normal human IgG (NH IgG) and the anti-Dsg3/1-depleted PV IgG (Dsg-depl. IgG), respectively. No difference between incubation with NH IgG and anti-Dsg3/1-depleted IgG was observed. In addition, incubation with Dsg3-specific IgG resulted in significantly higher fragmentations compared to both Dsg-depleted PV IgG and NH IgG, respectively. Data show the mean and standard error of the mean (error bars) of seven independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; n.s., not significant.

Anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted PV IgG prevents pathogenicity while anti-Dsg3-specific IgG results in blister formation in neonatal mice

When injected into neonatal mice, only total PV1 IgG contained enough anti-Dsg1 antibodies for the induction of skin blisters without co-injection of a subclinical dose of ETA (Figure 5A, lane 1). For mice injected with PV2 or PV3 IgG, gentle mechanical friction was required to obtain macroscopic blistering (Figure 5A, lanes 4 and 7). The injection of anti-Dsg3-specific IgG fractions from all three PV patients (combined with subclinical ETA doses) induced gross skin blistering (Figure 5A, lanes 2, 5, and 8). In contrast, anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted IgG from all three PV patients (combined with subclinical ETA doses) failed to induce blistering in neonatal mice (Figure 5A, lanes 3, 6, and 9). Lesional skin biopsies revealed suprabasal acantholysis, the characteristic histological finding of PV, after injection of PV IgG and anti-Dsg3-specific IgG, but not after injection of Dsg3/1-depleted PV IgG fractions or ETA alone (Figure 5D). By direct IF microscopy, intercellular IgG depositions were found in the epidermis in all PV IgG and anti-Dsg3-specific IgG-injected mice, but not in mice injected with anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted PV IgG or ETA alone (Figure 5B). By indirect IF microscopy on monkey esophagus, the characteristic intercellular staining was seen with sera of mice injected with PV IgG and anti-Dsg3 specific PV IgG, but not after injection of anti-Dsg1/3-depleted IgG or ETA alone (Figure 5C).
Figure 5

In vivo pathogenicity of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG fractions. Injection of neonatal mice (n = 3/ group) with PV IgG and anti-Dsg3-specific IgG purified from three different PV patients PV1, PV2, PV3) induced flaccid macroscopic blisters (A; lanes 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8; white arrows) and suprabasal splitting as seen by lesional histopathology (D; lanes 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8). No macroscopic and microscopic blistering was induced by PV IgG depleted of anti-Dsg3/1 IgG from the three PV patients (A,D; lanes 3, 6, and 9) or ETA alone (A,D; lane 10). By direct immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy of back skin, an intercellular epidermal staining was observed in mice injected with PV IgG (B; lanes 1, 4, and 7) or anti-Dsg3-specific IgG (B; lanes 2, 5, and 8) but not after injection of anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted IgG (B; lanes 3, 6, and 9) or ETA alone (B, lane 10). By indirect IF microscopy on monkey esophagus, the characteristic intercellular staining (1:80 dilutions are shown) was seen with sera of mice injected with PV IgG (C; lanes 1, 4, and 7) and anti-Dsg3-specific PV IgG (C; lanes 2, 5, and 8), but not after injection of PV IgG depleted of Dsg3-specific IgG (C; lanes 3, 6, and 9) or ETA alone (C, lane 10). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI.

In vivo pathogenicity of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) IgG fractions. Injection of neonatal mice (n = 3/ group) with PV IgG and anti-Dsg3-specific IgG purified from three different PV patients PV1, PV2, PV3) induced flaccid macroscopic blisters (A; lanes 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8; white arrows) and suprabasal splitting as seen by lesional histopathology (D; lanes 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8). No macroscopic and microscopic blistering was induced by PV IgG depleted of anti-Dsg3/1 IgG from the three PV patients (A,D; lanes 3, 6, and 9) or ETA alone (A,D; lane 10). By direct immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy of back skin, an intercellular epidermal staining was observed in mice injected with PV IgG (B; lanes 1, 4, and 7) or anti-Dsg3-specific IgG (B; lanes 2, 5, and 8) but not after injection of anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted IgG (B; lanes 3, 6, and 9) or ETA alone (B, lane 10). By indirect IF microscopy on monkey esophagus, the characteristic intercellular staining (1:80 dilutions are shown) was seen with sera of mice injected with PV IgG (C; lanes 1, 4, and 7) and anti-Dsg3-specific PV IgG (C; lanes 2, 5, and 8), but not after injection of PV IgG depleted of Dsg3-specific IgG (C; lanes 3, 6, and 9) or ETA alone (C, lane 10). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI.

Discussion

Adjuvant immunoadsorption is a well-established treatment option in a variety of autoantibody-mediated diseases including PV. So far, more than 100 pemphigus patients were reported to have been subjected to immunoadsorption which has been recommended in the guideline of the German Dermatological Society for the treatment of refractory or severe PV (21, 36). Furthermore, the results of a randomized control trial comparing the efficacy and safety of immunoadsorption plus best medical treatment with best medical treatment alone in pemphigus are currently evaluated. In PV, it may be of particular value to rapidly reduce the amount of circulating autoantibodies at the beginning of treatment at a stage when other therapies, i.e., corticosteroids, azathioprine, and rituximab, are not yet effective. This assumption is supported by the clear evidence of a direct pathogenic effect of pemphigus autoantibodies as demonstrated by the occurrence of transient pemphigus in neonates of mothers with PV, the correlation of disease activity with serum levels of anti-Dsg1/3 IgG and various experimental models in vitro and in vivo (2, 15, 20, 33). Conventional immunoadsorption is, however, limited due to the risk of hypogammaglobulinaemia and the subsequent risk of infections. This disadvantage would not be applicable for the use of autoantibody-specific adsorbers. Therefore, we have recently developed Dsg1- and Dsg3-specific adsorbers based on the recombinant Dsg ectodomains. We could show that the prototypic adsorbers effectively removed anti-Dsg1/3 IgG from PV and PF sera and eliminated the pathogenic effect of PV and PF IgG in vitro (26). In the present study, the prototypic adsorbers were employed to investigate whether Dsg1/3-specific adsorption can also abolish the pathogenic effect of PV IgG in vivo. Extending our previous studies (26), we asked the question whether anti-Dsg3-specific IgG alone, i.e., without the addition of non-desmoglein antibodies, is sufficient to induce pathogenic effects in vitro and intraepidermal blistering in mice. Our experiments are of particular importance since the concept that in the great majority of PV patients, the pathogenic effects of autoantibodies are mediated by anti-Dsg antibodies is challenged (13, 16). Furthermore, although Amagai et al. previously showed that affinity-purified anti-Dsg3 IgG prevented pathogenicity in vivo (37), there are still doubts about the specificity of the affinity purification as the recombinant Dsg3 fragment used for this process contained the constant region of human IgG1 that might have also bound to non-Dsg PV autoantibodies (13, 38). In our Dsg1/3-specific adsorbers, only the ectodomains of Dsg1 and 3 were used (26). Here, we initially demonstrated the high efficiency of the Dsg3/1-specific adsorbers since no anti-Dsg3 or anti-Dsg1 IgG antibodies could be detected in the Dsg3/1-depleted IgG fraction by ELISA. This result was corroborated by Western blotting of anti-Dsg1/3-specific IgG and anti-Dsg1/3 IgG-depleted PV IgG fractions with extract of human keratinocytes. In line, by indirect IF microscopy on monkey esophagus both, total PV IgG and anti-Dsg3-specific IgG but not anti-Dsg3/1 IgG-depleted PV IgG and normal human IgG stained the epithelium. Next, we demonstrated in two different in vitro assays that PV IgG, depleted from anti-Dsg1/3 reactivity by the use of the Dsg1/3-specific adsorbers, lost their pathogenic effect. No difference between anti-Dsg1/3 IgG-depleted IgG and normal human IgG was observed in both, the desmosome degradation assay and the dispase-based dissociation assay. In contrast, PV IgG and anti-Dsg3-specific IgG obtained after elution from our Dsg1/3-specific adsorbers led to increased desmosome degradation and keratinocyte dissociation, respectively. It has already previously been shown that human keratinocytes loose Dsg3 expression on their cell surface after incubation with PV IgG (39, 40). Nevertheless, we observed that total PV IgG and anti-Dsg3-specific IgG from PV3 resulted in less Dsg3 degradation (Figures 3G,H) compared to the IgG fractions of PV1 and PV2. We hypothesize that the weaker desmosome-degrading capacity of both PV3 IgG and PV3 anti-Dsg3-specific IgG may be explained by the lower anti-Dsg3 IgG titers in this patient (Table 2). Furthermore, the different PV IgG fractions were also assayed in the neonatal mouse model of PV. Initially, Anhalt and coworkers reported that the injection of PV serum in neonatal mice recapitulated major clinical and immunopathological characteristics of the human diseases, i.e., flaccid blisters that easily erode when mechanical friction is applied, intraepidermal split formation as detected by histopathology, and the intercellular binding of PV antibodies in the epidermis as seen by direct IF microscopy (33). In the present study, the injection of PV IgG and Dsg1/3-specific IgG led to macroscopic and microscopic blisters indicating that anti-Dsg1/3 IgG alone is pathogenic and does not require the presence of non-Dsg PV autoantibodies. These data are supported by the previous observations that injection of the monoclonal anti-Dsg3 antibody AK23 resulted in blister formation in neonatal as well as in adult mice (41, 42). More important for the future use of the Dsg1/3-specific adsorbers in the treatment of PV patients is our observation that PV IgG fractions depleted from anti-Dsg1/3 reactivity did not induce skin lesions when injected into neonatal mice. These results unequivocally show that non-Dsg antibodies that had been previously described in PV sera directed e.g., against muscarinic and nicotinic acethylcholine receptors, annexins, thyroid peroxidase, and mitochondrial proteins are not a prerequisite for blister formation in PV. In line, these non-Dsg antibodies have not yet been described to be pathogenic in vivo while co-pathogenic effects have been reported in vitro (13, 15, 17, 18, 20, 43, 44). One may speculate that the previously proposed pathogenic effect of non-Dsg antibodies in PV is not a key element for the initiation of blister formation. In contrast, anti-desmocollin autoantibodies that have been described in pemphigus sera caused desmosome degradation in the desmosome degradation assay, cell fragmentation in the dispase-based dissociation assay, and suprabasal splitting in an ex vivo skin model (45–47). In line, desmocollin 3-deficient mice present with skin erosions and suprabasal intraepidermal blistering (48). However, evidence is accumulating that anti-desmocollin autoantibodies may be more relevant in paraneoplastic and atypical pemphigus than in PV and PF (49–51). In fact, in a large prospective study with more than 330 pemphigus patients, only 4% of all pemphigus sera and 2.7% of PV and PF sera exhibited anti-desmocollin reactivity, while 98% of sera contained anti-Dsg3 and/or anti-Dsg1 IgG (52). These data indicate that only in a small number of PV and PF patients, Dsg1/3-specific immunoadsorption may not be clinically effective although anti-Dsg1/3 antibodies have effectively been decreased. Future studies now aim at applying the Dsg3/1-specific adsorbers in a clinical trial with PV patients.

Author contributions

MH contributed to the performance of the experiments and the writing of the manuscript. JD contributed to the planning of the project and the performance of the experiments. SE and JL contributed to the performance of the experiments and to the revision of the manuscript. FW contributed to the performance of the experiments and to the revision of the manuscript. LK contributed to the planning of the project. DZ contributed to the planning of the project and to the revision of the manuscript. WS contributed to the planning of the project and to the revision of the manuscript. CP contributed to the planning of the project and to the revision of the manuscript. ES contributed to the planning of the project and to the writing of the manuscript. SG contributed to the planning of the project and to the writing of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

JD, JL, LK, and CP are employees of Euroimmun AG. Winfried Stöcker is board members of Euroimmun AG. DZ and ES have a research cooperation with Euroimmun. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  52 in total

1.  Novel human alpha9 acetylcholine receptor regulating keratinocyte adhesion is targeted by Pemphigus vulgaris autoimmunity.

Authors:  V T Nguyen; A Ndoye; S A Grando
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  IgG autoantibodies against desmocollin 3 in pemphigus sera induce loss of keratinocyte adhesion.

Authors:  David Rafei; Ralf Müller; Norito Ishii; Maria Llamazares; Takashi Hashimoto; Michael Hertl; Rüdiger Eming
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Immunoadsorption in dermatology.

Authors:  Enno Schmidt; Detlef Zillikens
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.017

4.  Rituximab as first-line treatment of pemphigus.

Authors:  Enno Schmidt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  First-line rituximab combined with short-term prednisone versus prednisone alone for the treatment of pemphigus (Ritux 3): a prospective, multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised trial.

Authors:  Pascal Joly; Maud Maho-Vaillant; Catherine Prost-Squarcioni; Vivien Hebert; Estelle Houivet; Sébastien Calbo; Frédérique Caillot; Marie Laure Golinski; Bruno Labeille; Catherine Picard-Dahan; Carle Paul; Marie-Aleth Richard; Jean David Bouaziz; Sophie Duvert-Lehembre; Philippe Bernard; Frederic Caux; Marina Alexandre; Saskia Ingen-Housz-Oro; Pierre Vabres; Emmanuel Delaporte; Gaelle Quereux; Alain Dupuy; Sebastien Debarbieux; Martine Avenel-Audran; Michel D'Incan; Christophe Bedane; Nathalie Bénéton; Denis Jullien; Nicolas Dupin; Laurent Misery; Laurent Machet; Marie Beylot-Barry; Olivier Dereure; Bruno Sassolas; Thomas Vermeulin; Jacques Benichou; Philippe Musette
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Routine detection of serum antidesmocollin autoantibodies is only useful in patients with atypical pemphigus.

Authors:  Swantje Mindorf; Inga M Dettmann; Stine Krüger; Tarek Fuhrmann; Kristin Rentzsch; Ingolf Karl; Christian Probst; Lars Komorowski; Kai Fechner; Nina van Beek; Susanne Lemcke; Miklós Sárdy; Christine Bangert; Sandrine Benoit; Takashi Hashimoto; Detlef Zillikens; Hendri H Pas; Marcel F Jonkman; Winfried Stöcker; Enno Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 3.960

7.  Explanations for the clinical and microscopic localization of lesions in pemphigus foliaceus and vulgaris.

Authors:  M G Mahoney; Z Wang; K Rothenberger; P J Koch; M Amagai; J R Stanley
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Meeting Report of the Pathogenesis of Pemphigus and Pemphigoid Meeting in Munich, September 2016.

Authors:  Enno Schmidt; Volker Spindler; Rüdiger Eming; Masayuki Amagai; Frank Antonicelli; John F Baines; Meriem Belheouane; Philippe Bernard; Luca Borradori; Marzia Caproni; Giovanni Di Zenzo; Sergei Grando; Karen Harman; Marcel F Jonkman; Hiroshi Koga; Ralf J Ludwig; Andrew P Kowalczyk; Eliane J Müller; Wataru Nishie; Hendri Pas; Aimee S Payne; Christian D Sadik; Allan Seppänen; Jane Setterfield; Hiroshi Shimizu; Animesh A Sinha; Eli Sprecher; Michael Sticherling; Hideyuki Ujiie; Detlef Zillikens; Michael Hertl; Jens Waschke
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Absorption of pathogenic autoantibodies by the extracellular domain of pemphigus vulgaris antigen (Dsg3) produced by baculovirus.

Authors:  M Amagai; T Hashimoto; N Shimizu; T Nishikawa
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Desmocollin 3-mediated binding is crucial for keratinocyte cohesion and is impaired in pemphigus.

Authors:  Volker Spindler; Wolfgang-Moritz Heupel; Athina Efthymiadis; Enno Schmidt; Rüdiger Eming; Christian Rankl; Peter Hinterdorfer; Thomas Müller; Detlev Drenckhahn; Jens Waschke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  [Immunoadsorption in dermatology].

Authors:  Franziska Hübner; Michael Kasperkiewicz; Detlef Zillikens; Enno Schmidt
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  In Vitro, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo Models for the Study of Pemphigus.

Authors:  Roberta Lotti; Claudio Giacinto Atene; Emma Dorotea Zanfi; Matteo Bertesi; Tommaso Zanocco-Marani
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Drug Development in Pemphigoid Diseases.

Authors:  Katja Bieber; Ralf J Ludwig
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.875

4.  Identification of Autoreactive B Cell Subpopulations in Peripheral Blood of Autoimmune Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris.

Authors:  Robert Pollmann; Elias Walter; Thomas Schmidt; Jens Waschke; Michael Hertl; Christian Möbs; Rüdiger Eming
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Role of Dsg1- and Dsg3-Mediated Signaling in Pemphigus Autoantibody-Induced Loss of Keratinocyte Cohesion.

Authors:  Elias Walter; Franziska Vielmuth; Marie-Therès Wanuske; Matthias Seifert; Robert Pollmann; Rüdiger Eming; Jens Waschke
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Emerging immunotherapies for autoimmune kidney disease.

Authors:  Mary Helen Foster; Jeffrey Robinson Ord
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.526

Review 7.  Pemphigus: Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Dario Didona; Roberto Maglie; Rüdiger Eming; Michael Hertl
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  Mechanisms Causing Acantholysis in Pemphigus-Lessons from Human Skin.

Authors:  Desalegn Tadesse Egu; Thomas Schmitt; Jens Waschke
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 9.  Bullous Autoimmune Dermatoses–Clinical Features, Diagnostic Evaluation, and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Nina van Beek; Detlef Zillikens; Enno Schmidt
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 8.251

10.  Identification of novel therapeutic targets for blocking acantholysis in pemphigus.

Authors:  Imke A K Burmester; Sarah Flaswinkel; Clara-Sophie Thies; Anika Kasprick; Mayumi Kamaguchi; Valéria Bumiller-Bini; Shirin Emtenani; Nick Feldmann; Khalaf Kridin; Enno Schmidt; Nina van Beek; Detlef Zillikens; Christoph M Hammers; Jennifer E Hundt; Ralf J Ludwig
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 8.739

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.