Cyrus Ahalt1, Irena Stijacic-Cenzer1, Bruce L Miller2,3,4, Howard J Rosen2,3,4, Deborah E Barnes5,6,7, Brie A Williams1,4,8. 1. Division of Geriatrics Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 2. Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 3. Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 4. Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 7. Research Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California. 8. Tideswell, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine prevalence of, and outcomes associated with, a positive screen for cognitive impairment in older adults in jail. DESIGN: Combined data from cross-sectional (n=185 participants) and longitudinal (n=125 participants) studies. SETTING: Urban county jail. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals in jail aged 55 and older (N = 310; mean age 59, range 55-80). Inclusion of individuals aged 55 and older is justified because the criminal justice system defines "geriatric prisoners" as those aged 55 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline and follow-up assessments of health, psychosocial factors, and cognitive status (using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)); 6-month acute care use and repeat arrest assessed in those followed longitudinally. RESULTS: Participants were of low socioeconomic status (85% annual income < $15,000) and predominantly nonwhite (75%). Many (70%) scored less than 25 on the MoCA; those with a low MoCA score were more likely to be nonwhite (81% vs 62%, p<.001) and report fair or poor health (54% vs 41%, p=.04). Over 6 months, a MoCA score of less than 25 was associated with multiple emergency department visits (32% vs 13%, p=.02), hospitalization (35% vs 16%, p=.03), and repeat arrests (45% vs 21%, p=.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment is prevalent in older adults in jail and is associated with adverse health and criminal justice outcomes. A geriatric approach to jail-based and transitional health care should be developed to assess and address cognitive impairment. Additional research is needed to better assess cognitive impairment and its consequences in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2065-2071, 2018.
OBJECTIVES: To determine prevalence of, and outcomes associated with, a positive screen for cognitive impairment in older adults in jail. DESIGN: Combined data from cross-sectional (n=185 participants) and longitudinal (n=125 participants) studies. SETTING: Urban county jail. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals in jail aged 55 and older (N = 310; mean age 59, range 55-80). Inclusion of individuals aged 55 and older is justified because the criminal justice system defines "geriatric prisoners" as those aged 55 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline and follow-up assessments of health, psychosocial factors, and cognitive status (using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)); 6-month acute care use and repeat arrest assessed in those followed longitudinally. RESULTS:Participants were of low socioeconomic status (85% annual income < $15,000) and predominantly nonwhite (75%). Many (70%) scored less than 25 on the MoCA; those with a low MoCA score were more likely to be nonwhite (81% vs 62%, p<.001) and report fair or poor health (54% vs 41%, p=.04). Over 6 months, a MoCA score of less than 25 was associated with multiple emergency department visits (32% vs 13%, p=.02), hospitalization (35% vs 16%, p=.03), and repeat arrests (45% vs 21%, p=.01). CONCLUSIONS:Cognitive impairment is prevalent in older adults in jail and is associated with adverse health and criminal justice outcomes. A geriatric approach to jail-based and transitional health care should be developed to assess and address cognitive impairment. Additional research is needed to better assess cognitive impairment and its consequences in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2065-2071, 2018.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Anna H Chodos; Cyrus Ahalt; Irena Stijacic Cenzer; Janet Myers; Joe Goldenson; Brie A Williams Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Josiah D Rich; Redonna Chandler; Brie A Williams; Dora Dumont; Emily A Wang; Faye S Taxman; Scott A Allen; Jennifer G Clarke; Robert B Greifinger; Christopher Wildeman; Fred C Osher; Steven Rosenberg; Craig Haney; Marc Mauer; Bruce Western Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Randall L Kuffel; Amy L Byers; Brie Williams; Richard Fortinsky; Yixia Li; Michael A Ruderman; Lisa C Barry Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Maximilian Meyer; Bernd Rist; Johannes Strasser; Undine E Lang; Marc Vogel; Kenneth M Dürsteler; Marc Walter Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 3.630