Literature DB >> 30232803

Risk-based decision making in transfusion medicine.

Judie Leach Bennett1, Dana V Devine1,2.   

Abstract

Formal processes to assess risk are well established in numerous areas of society including the environment, transportation, energy and food production sectors as well as some areas of health care such as new drugs or other therapeutic goods. However, these processes and their associated frameworks have only recently come to be used to make decisions in blood transfusion practice or in blood system policy development. This review describes the evolution of the use of risk-based decision making and discusses the elements that should be considered in its application to blood system issues. Following the identification and characterization of the risk, a structured process is undertaken to assess the magnitude of the risk and the level of risk reduction that can reasonably be achieved in the context of the complexity of the risk management action proposed and its cost. Inputs must be sought from appropriate subject matter experts, but also from those who can consider issues of ethics and social values. Engagement of the public is an essential step. Proposed interventions should be assessed for their likelihood of mitigating the risk and the proportional resource allocation in comparison with similar risks to the blood system or health system. Examples are provided of how a risk-based decision-making framework is used to address identified risks in the blood system.
© 2018 International Society of Blood Transfusion.

Keywords:  blood safety; risk-based decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30232803     DOI: 10.1111/vox.12708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vox Sang        ISSN: 0042-9007            Impact factor:   2.144


  3 in total

1.  Proceedings of the Food and Drug Administration public workshop on pathogen reduction technologies for blood safety 2018 (Commentary, p. 3026).

Authors:  Chintamani Atreya; Simone Glynn; Michael Busch; Steve Kleinman; Edward Snyder; Sara Rutter; James AuBuchon; Willy Flegel; David Reeve; Dana Devine; Claudia Cohn; Brian Custer; Raymond Goodrich; Richard J Benjamin; Anna Razatos; Jose Cancelas; Stephen Wagner; Michelle Maclean; Monique Gelderman; Andrew Cap; Paul Ness
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  A WHO tool for risk-based decision making on blood safety interventions.

Authors:  Mart P Janssen; C Micha Nuebling; François-Xavier Lery; Yuyun S Maryuningsih; Jay S Epstein
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Risk of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease transmission by blood transfusion in Australia.

Authors:  Hamish McManus; Clive R Seed; Veronica C Hoad; Philip Kiely; John M Kaldor; Claire E Styles; Hong Yang; Matthew Law; Iain B Gosbell
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.