Literature DB >> 30232721

Efficacy and safety of low-intensity shock wave therapy in penile rehabilitation post nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Tamer S Zewin1, Ahmed El-Assmy2, Ahmed M Harraz1, Mahmoud Bazeed1, Ahmed A Shokeir1, Khaled Sheir1, Ahmed Mosbah1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the role of low-intensity extra corporeal shock wave therapy (LI-ESWT) in penile rehabilitation (PR) post nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy (NS-RCP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 152 sexually active men with muscle invasive bladder cancer. After bilateral NS-RCP with orthotopic diversion by a single expert surgeon between June 2014 and July 2016, 128 patients were available categorized into three groups: LI-ESWT group (42 patients), phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) group (43 patients), and control group (43 patients).
RESULTS: Mean age was 53.2 ± 6.5 years. Mean ± SD follow-up period was 21 ± 8 months. During first follow-up FU1, all patients of the three groups had insufficient erection for vaginal penetration; with decrease of preoperative IIEF-EF mean score from 27.9 to 6.9. Potency recovery rates at 9 months were 76.2%, 79.1%, and 60.5% in LI-ESWT, PDE5i, and control groups, respectively. There was statistically significant increase in IIEF-EF and EHS scores during all follow-up periods in all the study groups (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the three groups during all follow-up periods. Statistical evaluation showed no significant difference in continence and oncological outcomes during all follow-up points among the three groups (p = 0.55 and 0.07, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: During last follow-up, 16% more patients in LI-ESWT group had recovery of potency as compared to the control group. Although the difference is not statistically significant, but of clinical importance. LI-ESWT is safe as oral PDE5i in penile rehabilitation post nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystoprostatectomy; Low-intensity shock wave; Nerve sparing; Penile rehabilitation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30232721     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1987-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the efficacy of the early LI-SWT plus daily tadalafil with daily tadalafil only as penile rehabilitation for postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Jae-Wook Chung; Tae Gyun Kwon; Se Won Jang; Eun Hye Lee; So Young Chun; Yun-Sok Ha; Seock Hwan Choi; Jun Nyung Lee; Bum Soo Kim; Hyun Tae Kim; See Hyung Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim; Eun Sang Yoo
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 2.  Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Beom Yong Rho; Si Hyeon Kim; Ji-Kan Ryu; Dong Hyuk Kang; Jong Won Kim; Doo Yong Chung
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Neurogenic Erectile Dysfunction. Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Charalampos Thomas; Charalampos Konstantinidis
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 4.  Regenerative technology to restore and preserve erectile function in men following prostate cancer treatment: evidence for penile rehabilitation in the context of prostate cancer survivorship.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2021-08-21

Review 5.  Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Onder Canguven; Kareim Khalafalla; Abdulla Al Ansari
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2021-07-05

6.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials of Clinical Outcomes of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Treating Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Huibao Yao; Xiaofeng Wang; Hongquan Liu; Fengze Sun; Gonglin Tang; Xingjun Bao; Jitao Wu; Zhongbao Zhou; Jian Ma
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Low-intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for the Management of Postprostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Ahmed Eissa; Carlo Bellorofonte; Alessandro Mofferdin; Mosaab Eldeeb; Simone Assumma; Enrico Panio; Tommaso Calcagnile; Daniele Stroppa; Giorgio Bozzini; Giorgia Gaia; Stefano Terzoni; Mattia Sangalli; Salvatore Micali; Bernardo Rocco
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-07-30

Review 8.  A review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: Evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2021-11-20

Review 9.  Low-intensity shock wave therapy for the treatment of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction: a narrative review of technical considerations and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Pedro Simoes de Oliveira; Matthew J Ziegelmann
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.