Jessica L Rinsky1,2, Sheila Higgins2, Kim Angelon-Gaetz2, Doris Hogan3, Pierre Lauffer2, Megan Davies2, Aaron Fleischauer2,4, Kristin Musolin5, John Gibbins5, Jennifer MacFarquhar2,4, Zack Moore2. 1. 1 Epidemic Intelligence Service Program, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. 2 Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC, USA. 3. 3 Forsyth County Department of Public Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. 4. 4 Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. 5 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2016, North Carolina blood lead level (BLL) surveillance activities identified elevated BLLs among 3 children exposed to take-home lead by household members employed at a lead oxide manufacturing facility. We characterized BLLs among employees and associated children and identified risk factors for occupational and take-home lead exposure. METHODS: We reviewed BLL surveillance data for 2012-2016 to identify facility employees and associated children. We considered a BLL ≥5 μg/dL elevated for adults and children and compared adult BLLs with regulatory limits and recommended health-based thresholds. We also conducted an environmental investigation and interviewed current employees about exposure controls and cleanup procedures. RESULTS: During 2012-2016, 5 children associated with facility employees had a confirmed BLL ≥5 μg/dL. Among 77 people employed during 2012-2016, median BLLs increased from 22 μg/dL (range, 4-45 μg/dL) in 2012 to 37 μg/dL (range, 16-54 μg/dL) in 2016. All employee BLLs were <60 μg/dL, the national regulatory threshold for immediate medical removal from lead exposure; however, 55 (71%) had a BLL ≥20 μg/dL, a recommended health-based threshold for removal from lead exposure. Because of inadequate controls in the facility, areas considered clean were visibly contaminated with lead dust. Employees reported bringing personal items to work and then into their cars and homes, resulting in take-home lead exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of child and adult BLL surveillance activities identified an occupational source of lead exposure among workers and associated children. Our findings support recent recommendations that implementation of updated lead standards will support better control of lead in the workplace and prevent lead from being carried home.
OBJECTIVE: In 2016, North Carolina blood lead level (BLL) surveillance activities identified elevated BLLs among 3 children exposed to take-home lead by household members employed at a lead oxide manufacturing facility. We characterized BLLs among employees and associated children and identified risk factors for occupational and take-home lead exposure. METHODS: We reviewed BLL surveillance data for 2012-2016 to identify facility employees and associated children. We considered a BLL ≥5 μg/dL elevated for adults and children and compared adult BLLs with regulatory limits and recommended health-based thresholds. We also conducted an environmental investigation and interviewed current employees about exposure controls and cleanup procedures. RESULTS: During 2012-2016, 5 children associated with facility employees had a confirmed BLL ≥5 μg/dL. Among 77 people employed during 2012-2016, median BLLs increased from 22 μg/dL (range, 4-45 μg/dL) in 2012 to 37 μg/dL (range, 16-54 μg/dL) in 2016. All employee BLLs were <60 μg/dL, the national regulatory threshold for immediate medical removal from lead exposure; however, 55 (71%) had a BLL ≥20 μg/dL, a recommended health-based threshold for removal from lead exposure. Because of inadequate controls in the facility, areas considered clean were visibly contaminated with lead dust. Employees reported bringing personal items to work and then into their cars and homes, resulting in take-home lead exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of child and adult BLL surveillance activities identified an occupational source of lead exposure among workers and associated children. Our findings support recent recommendations that implementation of updated lead standards will support better control of lead in the workplace and prevent lead from being carried home.
Entities:
Keywords:
environmental exposure; epidemiology; lead; occupational health
Authors: Ronald Dykeman; Guadalupe Aguilar-Madrid; Tom Smith; Cuauhtemoc Arturo Juárez-Pérez; Gregory M Piacitelli; Howard Hu; Mauricio Hernandez-Avila Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: E A Whelan; G M Piacitelli; B Gerwel; T M Schnorr; C A Mueller; J Gittleman; T D Matte Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Chamnong Thanapop; Alan F Geater; Mark G Robson; Pitchaya Phakthongsuk; Duangkamol Viroonudomphol Journal: J Occup Health Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Michael J Kosnett; Richard P Wedeen; Stephen J Rothenberg; Karen L Hipkins; Barbara L Materna; Brian S Schwartz; Howard Hu; Alan Woolf Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-12-22 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: William E Daniell; Lo Van Tung; Ryan M Wallace; Deborah J Havens; Catherine J Karr; Nguyen Bich Diep; Gerry A Croteau; Nancy J Beaudet; Nguyen Duy Bao Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Elizabeth M Kamai; Julie L Daniels; Paul L Delamater; Bruce P Lanphear; Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson; David B Richardson Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 11.035
Authors: Lisa M Gatzke-Kopp; Siri Warkentien; Michael Willoughby; Chris Fowler; David C Folch; Clancy Blair Journal: Health Place Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 4.931
Authors: Netzy Peralta; Alejandra Cantoral; Martha María Téllez-Rojo; Belem Valdivia; Daniel Estrada-Sánchez; Vesta Richardson-L; Jack Caravano; Richard Fuller Journal: Front Toxicol Date: 2022-03-07