| Literature DB >> 30231143 |
Jhenifer Karvat1, Camila Mayumi Martin Kakihata1, Lizyana Vieira1, José Luis da Conceição Silva1, Lucinéia de Fátima Chasko Ribeiro1, Rose Meire Costa Brancalhão1, Gladson Ricardo Flor Bertolini1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of right sciatic nerve compression and cryotherapy on muscle tissue.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30231143 PMCID: PMC6178854 DOI: 10.1590/S1679-45082018AO4206
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1679-4508
Grasping strength of control (C) group, Injury (I3, I8 and I15) group and group treated with cryotherapy (CrioI3, CrioI8, and CrioI15)
| Assessment | C | I3 | CrioI3 | I8 | CrioI8 | I15 | ICrio15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72.7±32.5 | 64.1±36.5 | 53.9±16.4 | 41.8±18.9 | 33.6±10.3 | 43.2±29.6 | 57.7±31.5 |
| 2 | 51.3±17.1 | 6.1±8.7 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 |
| 3 | 66.2±20.7 | 18.7±29.1 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 |
Significant difference compared with Control Group. Results expressed as mean and standard deviation.
Weight of tibialis anterior muscle of Wistar rats
| Control | After surgery | Injury | Cryotherapy injury |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.812±0.264 | 3° | 0.584± 0.049 | 0.544±0.032 |
| 8° | 0.397±0.033 | 0.442±0.043 | |
| 15° | 0.359±0.012 | 0.347 ± 0.014 |
Difference between Control Group;
difference in relation to injury 3 group;
difference in relation to cryotherapy injury 8 group. Results reported as standard deviation and means.
Diameter of tibialis anterior muscle fiber of Wistar rats
| Control | After surgery | Injury | Cryotherapy injury |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37.61±4.58 | 3° | 34.71±2.72 | 37.08±2.54 |
| 8° | 31.85±3.16 | 36.07±4.01 | |
| 15° | 30.33±2.42 | 30.08±3.44 |
Difference in relation to Control Group;
difference in relation to Injury 8 group. Results are reported as means and standard deviations.
Mean and standard deviation of tibialis anterior muscle fibers of Wistar rats
| Control | After surgery | Injury | Cryotherapy injury |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,726±400 | 3° | 1,465±188 | 1,732 ± 245 |
| 8° | 1,190±170 | 1,469±332 | |
| 15° | 1,005±163 | 1,095±161 |
Difference between Control Group. Results are reported as mean and standard deviation.
Figure 1Photomicrography of tibialis anterior muscle of Wistar rates of Control Group, cross-sectional cut, hematoxylin and eosin staining, 1000x. 10μm bar. Muscle fibers (mf) with polygonal format, peripheric nucleus (N) and normal fascicular pattern. Capillary vessel (arrow) in endomysial conjunctive
Figure 2Photomicrography of tibialis anterior muscle of Wistar rats, crosssectional cut, hematoxylin and eosin staining. 1,000 x. 10μm bar. Groups: (A) Injury 3, (B) Cryotherapy Injury 3, (C) Injury 8, (D) Cryotherapy Injury 8, (E) Injury 15, (F) Cryotherapy Injury 15. In Injury 3 group, Cryotherapy Injury 3 and Cryotherapy Injury 8 group, we could observe normal fascicular pattern of the tissue, muscle fibers with polygonal format, peripheral nucleus and complete capillary vessels (arrows) in conjunctive (A, B and D). Despite Injury 8, Injury 15, and Cryotherapy Injury 15 group had large amount of fiber of polymorphic muscles with reduce of its size, they maintained the peripheral position of cell nucleus (n) (C, E and F)
Hydroxyproline dosage of soleus muscle
| After surgery | Injury | Cryotherapy injury |
|---|---|---|
| 8° | 0.076±0.03 | 0.12±0.07 |
| 15° | 0.11±0.07 | 0.06±0.04 |