Clinical and genetic analysis of distal renal tubular acidosis in three Chinese children.

OBJECTIVE: Primary distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) is a rare genetic disease characterized by distal tubular dysfunction leading to metabolic acidosis and alkaline urine. Growth retardation is a major concern in these children. The disease is caused by defects in at least three genes (SLC4A1, ATP6V0A4, and ATP6V1B1) involved in urinary distal acidification. Several series of dRTA patients from different ethnic backgrounds have been genetically studied, but genetic studies regarding Chinese population is rare. Our aim was to investigate the clinical features and genetic basis of primary dRTA in Chinese children.
METHODS: Three unrelated patients with dRTA participated in our study. Next-generation sequencing was performed, and the findings were validated using the Sanger sequencing method.
RESULTS: All patients exhibited hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis, abnormally high urine pH, hypokalemia, and nephrocalcinosis. Growth retardation was observed in all patients. During the follow-up (range 1-4 years), alkali replacement therapy corrected the systemic metabolic acidosis, and two patients demonstrated normal growth. rhGH therapy was administered to patient-3 at the age of 6 years, and his growth rate was significantly improved (growth velocity 9.6 cm/yr). In total, 5 mutations were identified in our cohort of three patients, and four mutations were novel.
CONCLUSIONS: We report the clinical and molecular characteristics of dRTA patients from China. The four novel mutations detected in our study extend the spectrum of gene mutations associated with primary dRTA. Furthermore, our study confirms the effect of early treatment in improving growth for dRTA patient and provides insight into the effects of rhGH on dRTA patients who were diagnosed late and exhibiting a persistent growth delay despite appropriate therapy.

Introduction

Renal tubular acidosis (RTA) is a clinical syndrome resulting from renal tubular failure of acid secretion and/or bicarbonate reabsorption that leads to metabolic acidosis with a normal anion gap (hyperchloraemic). RTA can represent a primary or secondary defect. Primary defects are common in children due to gene mutations or the idiopathic nature of the syndrome, whereas secondary defects are more common in adults. RTA is classified into the following four types based on the clinical features: distal renal tubular acidosis (type I), proximal renal tubular acidosis (type II), combined proximal and distal renal tubular acidosis (type III), and hyperkalaemic renal tubular acidosis (type IV) [1]. Primary dRTA is an inherited disorder caused by mutations in at least three genes (SLC4A1, ATP6V0A4, and ATP6V1B1) [2]. Both autosomal-dominant and autosomal-recessive forms of dRTA have been described.

Several series of dRTA patients from different ethnic backgrounds have been genetically studied [3-13]. To date, dRTA cases caused by gene mutations in the Chinese population have rarely been reported [14,15]. In sporadic cases, clinical features and family history could not offer any information of the causal underlying gene, which means complete genetic testing of all the pathogenic genes is necessary. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers convenience in efficiently and simultaneously analyzing multiple genes.

In this study, we performed a gene analysis of three sporadic dRTA cases diagnosed at our center by NGS. The clinical data and gene analysis of these patients are summarized and reported.

Methods

Patients

Three Chinese patients participated in this study. The patients’ clinical features and laboratory findings were collected. The diagnosis of primary dRTA was based on the combination of an inability to acidify urine (pH >5.5) in the setting of a normal anion gap, spontaneous metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia, and no evidence of secondary causes of dRTA. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 4 years, and the follow-up interval was three months.

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University. Informed consent for the blood collection and genetic analysis was obtained from the parents.

Gene analysis

Peripheral blood samples were collected from the dRTA patients and their parents into EDTA tubes. The genomic DNA was extracted from 2 mL of each sample using a QIAamp Blood DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Next-generation sequencing was performed by the Joy Orient Translational Medicine Research Center.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS)

The genomic DNA samples were sheared by sonication. The sheared genomic DNA was then hybridized using a NimbleGen 2.0 probe sequence capture array obtained from Roche, (http://www.nimblegen.com/products/seqcap/ez/v2/index.html) to enrich the exonic DNA (Joy Orient, China). The library enrichment was first tested by qPCR, followed by an assessment of the size distribution and concentration using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. The samples were then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2500 platform. Two parallel reactions were performed for each sample.

Data filtering, mapping and variant detection

The exon-enriched DNA was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform following the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina). The raw image files were processed using the BclToFastq (Illumina) for base calling and generating the raw data. The low-quality variations were filtered using the criterion of quality score ≥20 (Q20). The sequencing reads were aligned to the NCBI human reference genome (hg19) using BWA. Samtools and Pindel were used to analyze the SNPs and indels in the sequence.

Synonymous changes and SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) with MAF (minor allele frequency) greater than 5% were removed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP).

Nonsynonymous changes were filtered using SIFT software (http://sift.jcvi.org).

The functions of the mutated genes and their relationship to the disease were analyzed.

Sanger sequencing was performed in the analysis to confirm the mutations.

The primers used to identify the mutations are presented in Table 1. The sequences were analyzed and compared to the reference sequences of each gene (ATP6V1B1: NM_001692, ATP6V0A4: NM_020632, and SLC4A1: NM_000342).

Table 1.

The primers used for Sanger sequence.

Gene (exon)	Forward primer	Reverse primer
SLC4A1 (E14)	GATGATGGACGGATGAATGGATGGATAA	GCTGAGGAGTTGGACACCTTGAAG
ATP6V1B1 (E5)	TGGTGGTGTGGAGGGTAGACA	GGTTCAGTGGAAGATTTGGGGATA
ATP6V1B1 (E9)	CTCTAAACACCTGGCTACACCTC	AGACCAAGCCCTGGAACTCAT
ATP6V0A4 (E14)	CATGATAACAAATACCAGCCTAGGAC	CCCCAACCATGAAAACAGTCAC
ATP6V0A4 (E21)	CCCCTGAAACTACGTATAAGATGTTG	AGGTATGTAAGCTGCTAAAGTCAC

The prediction of the biological function of the proteins of the reported missense mutations was performed using SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/), PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), and Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/).

Results

Clinical findings

We studied three patients (one girl and two boys) from independent nonconsanguineous families who presented with the clinical features of dRTA. The clinical features are presented in Table 2. Primary dRTA was clinically diagnosed based on the clinical features (i.e., growth retardation, dehydration, and vomiting) and laboratory findings (i.e., non-gap severe metabolic acidosis, high urinary pH, hypokalemia, and nephrocalcinosis) after excluding the secondary causes of dRTA. Two patients were diagnosed at 3 months of age, and 1 patient was diagnosed at 3 years of age. The initial manifestations were either acute, with dehydration and vomiting, or failure to thrive and/or weakness. The physical examination revealed growth retardation, and both the patients’ weight and height were below the 3rd–25th percentile. Rickets was noted in Patient-3. An audiometric evaluation revealed normal hearing at diagnosis in all patients.

Table 2.

Clinical features and laboratory tests of patients.

	Patient-1	Patient-2	Patient-3	Normal value
Age at Diagnosis	3 months	3 months	3 years
Gender	F	M	M
Initial manifestations	Vomiting and dehydration	Failure to thrive	Short stature and weakness
Height/percentile（cm/th）	58/p25	54/p3	90/p3
Weight/percentile（kg/th）	5.6/p25	4/p3	13/p10
Blood PH	7.26	7.29	7.26	7.35–7.45
HCO3− (mmol/L)	15.6	14.9	11.4	22–30
K+ (mmol/L)	2.6	3	1.9	3.5–5.5
Urinary PH	7.5	7.5	8	＜5.5
Nephrocalcinosis	Yes	Yes	Yes
SNHL	No	No	No

Acid-base homeostasis is critical for normal growth and development and the maintenance of normal cellular function. Alkali therapy is the conventional therapy used to maintain systemic homeostasis. For each patient, treatment with potassium citrate was initiated at diagnosis, and the dose of citrate was regulated based on the blood pH and biochemical findings. During the follow-up, two patients (except for Patient-3) achieved the average height with alkali therapy by the final follow-up (1 year). After three years of potassium citrate treatment, Patient-3 failed to exhibit the normal growth (human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy in patient-3 at 6 years of age. The average dose of rhGH was 0.05 mg/kg daily. After 10 months of rhGH therapy, he grew at an average rate of 9.6 cm per year, which was considerable increased following the initiation of the growth hormone therapy (3 cm/yr), and he achieved the average height for his age and gender (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Growth condition before and after rGH therapy in patient-3. Source: Child Growth Standards (0–5 years), 2006, World Health Organization. Growth Reference (5–19 years), 2007, World Health Organization.

Genetic analysis

The dRTA diagnosis of these patients was further confirmed by molecular analyses, which are important for achieving the precise diagnosis, guiding clinical therapy and prognosis, and genetic consultations. Five mutations in the dRTA genes (i.e., SLC4A1, ATP6V1B1, and ATP6VOA4) were identified in our study.

Patient-1 presented with a novel compound heterozygous mutation in the ATP6VOA4 gene consisting of a mutation in exon 14 with the single nucleotide change c.1418C > T, which caused a substitution of serine acid with phenylalanine at position 473 (p.S473F), and the nonsense mutation c.2419C > T (p.R807X,34) in exon 21, which resulted in the generation of a premature stop codon. These two mutations were predicted to be damaging by SIFT, PolyPhen-2, and Mutation Taster. The patient and her parents underwent Sanger sequencing using primers designed for exons 14 and 21 of the ATP6V0A4 gene. The gene analysis confirmed these mutations and revealed that the patient inherited the former mutated allele from her father and the latter from her mother (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Results of sequencing for the c.1418C > T and c.2419C > T mutations in ATP6V0A4 in family-1.

Patient-2 exhibited the following compound heterozygous mutations in the ATP6V1B1 gene: two heterozygous missense mutations of c.409C > T (p. P137 S) in exon 5 and c.904C > T (p. R302 W) in exon 9, which caused the change of a cytosine to a thymine at positions 409 and 904 of the ATP6V1B1 gene coding sequence. Although the c.409C > T (p. P137 S) mutation was predicted to be benign by Polyphen-2 (score:0.38), the bioinformatics analysis using SIFT and Mutation Taster confirmed the deleterious effect of this variation (SIFT: score: 0.01, median: 3.02, and Mutation Taster revealed a p value of 0.999). Furthermore, at this position, the nucleotide and amino acid are highly conserved (phyloP score: 4.766, PhastCons score: 0.998). The c.904C > T (p. R302 W) mutation was predicted to be disease causing by the three different prediction tools (SIFT: score: 0.00, median: 3.02, Polyphen-2: score: 0.998, and Mutation Taster revealed a p value of 1). We tested the presence of these two variants in his unaffected parents and identified a c.409C > T mutation in his mother and a c.904C > T mutation in his father (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Results of sequencing for the c.409C > T and c.904C > T mutations in ATP6V1B1 gene in family-2.

The missense mutation in exon 14 (c.1766C > T; p. R589H) of the SLC4A1 gene was identified in Patient-3 as a heterozygous mutation. The Sanger sequencing confirmed the identified mutation in SLC4A1. The mutation identified in our series (patient-3) has been previously published [16]. The patient’s parents harbored no mutation at this position, indicating that the mutation occurred de novo in our patient (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

DNA sequencing profile of the c.1766C > T mutation in SLC4A1 gene in family-3.

Discussion

dRTA results from impaired urinary acidification, leading to a series of clinical features, including inappropriate alkaline urine, metabolic acidosis with a normal anion gap and growth retardation. Both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive forms of primary dRTA have been described. Dominant dRTA has been attributed to SLC4A1 gene defect in 1997 by Bruce [16]. In the following two years, Karet et al. [17] and Smith et al. [18] demonstrated that the AR form of dRTA was associated with mutations in the ATP6V1B1 and ATP6V0A4 genes in patients with early or absent/late sensorineural hearing loss, respectively. To date, 30 mutations in SLC4A1, 38 mutations in ATP6V1B1, and 57 mutations in ATP6V0A4, including nonsense, missense, frameshift, and splice site mutations, have been identified as causes of dRTA. All mutations are predicted to disrupt the processing and trafficking of the AE1 Cl−/HCO3− exchanger or abrogate the production of the normal H+-ATPase proton pump [19-22].

In this study, 5 loss-of-function mutations were identified in our patients. Patient-1 carried a compound heterozygous mutation (p. S473F and p. R807X, 34) in the ATP6V0A4 gene, and Patient-2 harbored a compound heterozygous mutation (p. P137 S and p. R302 W) in the ATP6V1B1 gene. The deleterious predictions obtained by the bioinformatics software and the consistent autosomal recessive inheritance of the mutations from the unaffected parents indicate that the ATP6VOA4 and ATP6V1B1 compound heterozygous mutations are the genetic causes of dRTA in Patient-1 and Patient-2, respectively. Unlike the reported homozygous mutations of dRTA cases from high rate of consanguinity, our patient shows compound heterozygous mutations, which was due to the ban of consanguineous marriage and the ethics.

Defects in ATP6V1B1 are believed to cause dRTA with SNHL, whereas defects in ATP6V0A4 are responsible for cases without or late onset SNHL [3,17]. Our patients harboring the ATP6V1B1/ATP6VOA4 mutation exhibited normal hearing at diagnosis. Since our patients are young, long-term follow-up of these two patients is necessary to confirm the development and severity of hearing loss due to these novel mutations.

Patient-3, who harbors a de novo mutation (R5889H) in the SLC4A1 hotpot position [16], was diagnosed with dRTA at the age of 3, which is considerably older than the other patients who carried the ATP6V0A4 or ATP6V1B1 gene mutation. This result is consistent with previous records reporting that patients with recessive dRTA are severely affected and often diagnosed at a young age, whereas dominant dRTA is diagnosed at an older age, suggesting that cases with late clinical onset dRTA harbor SLC4A1 gene mutations.

Remarkably, the p. P137S and p. R302W mutations in ATP6V1B1 and p. S473F and p. R807X mutations in ATP6V0A4 have not been previously reported. These findings expand the spectrum of mutations in the SLC4A1, ATP6V1B1, and ATP6V0A4 genes associated with primary dRTA and provide insight into possible phenotype–genotype correlations.

Growth impairment is a major problem in children with renal tubular acidosis worthy of our concern. Acid-base homeostasis is critical for normal growth and development. Commonly, alkali supplementation can correct the systemic metabolic defects, restore a normal acid-base balance, and improve growth [23-25]. Although early treatment corrects the biochemical abnormalities and helps foster normal growth, the final height remains compromised in dRTA patients (the mean height SDS was −1.1 for patients diagnosed during infancy and −2 for those diagnosed later) [26,27]. Consistent with previous findings in which the catch-up growth was limited to the first 2 years of therapy in patients treated before 2 years of age, the first two patients, who were diagnosed at 3 months, exhibited significant growth, whereas Patient-3, who was diagnosed at 3 years of age, failed to exhibit catch-up growth during the three-year follow-up. In Patient-3, an endocrine evaluation revealed a short stature with unimpaired growth hormone secretion, and combined conventional alkali supplementation with rGH therapies improved his growth rate. Recombinant GH therapy in patients with a short stature with GHD and other disorders that do not fit the definition of classic GH deficiency, such as intrauterine growth restriction, healthy children with a short stature or chronic renal disease (CKD), has been reported to have a beneficial effect on growth with no adverse effects on renal function [28-30]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case in the literature describing the use of growth hormone therapy in a patient with poor growth associated with genetically diagnosed dRTA. Although the results were associated with a single case, our results inferred the beneficial effect of rGH therapy on patients with inherited distal renal tubular disease. Further studies involving more patients are needed to confirm this result.

Conclusions

In our study, we confirm the effect of early treatment in improving growth for dRTA patient and suggest that rGH therapy may have a beneficial effect on growth in dRTA patients who were diagnosed late and have a persistent growth delay. Overall, five different mutations were identified, and four mutations, i.e., the p. P137S and p. R302W mutations in ATP6V1B1 and p. S473F and p. R807X in ATP6V0A4, were novel disease-causing mutations. The identification of these mutations extended the spectrum of gene mutations associated with primary dRTA.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.