Literature DB >> 30230378

Three-dimensional study of the upper airway in different skeletal Class II malocclusion patterns.

Fernando C Brito, Daniel P Brunetto, Matilde C G Nojima.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterize upper airway volume and morphology in patients with different skeletal patterns of Class II malocclusion compared to Class I.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 197 individuals who had cone-beam computed tomography were allocated into groups according to ANB, SNA, and SNB angles (Class I, Class II maxillary protrusion, Class II mandibular retrusion), each subdivided into hypodivergent, normal, and hyperdivergent. Nasopharynx (NP), oropharynx (OP), and hypopharynx (HP) were assessed with three-dimensional image reconstruction software.
RESULTS: Intergroup comparison did not detect significant differences in volume and morphology of NP, OP, and HP. The males displayed larger OP and HP volume than the females. Positive correlations between age and NP, OP, HP volume and between craniocervical angle and OP and HP volume were observed. Linear regression analysis detected a tendency for OP and HP volume to increase as maxillary and mandibular length increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Upper airway volume and morphology were similar in different skeletal patterns of Class II malocclusion. Actual upper and lower jaw lengths were more closely related to upper airway volume and morphology than the angles that reflected their position relative to the cranial base.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Class II; Sagittal patterns; Upper airway; Vertical patterns

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30230378      PMCID: PMC8137119          DOI: 10.2319/112117-806.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  25 in total

1.  The influence of craniofacial morphology on the upper airway dimensions.

Authors:  Iveta Indriksone; Gundega Jakobsone
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Airway growth and development: a computerized 3-dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Stephen A Schendel; Richard Jacobson; Sadri Khalessi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Sample calculations for comparison of 2 means.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pandis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Nasorespiratory characteristics and craniofacial morphology.

Authors:  G T Kluemper; P S Vig; K W Vig
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.

Authors:  W Hussels; R S Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-05

6.  Pharyngeal airway volume and shape from cone-beam computed tomography: relationship to facial morphology.

Authors:  Dan Grauer; Lucia S H Cevidanes; Martin A Styner; James L Ackerman; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Cameron Aboudara; Ib Nielsen; John C Huang; Koutaro Maki; Arthur J Miller; David Hatcher
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with Class I malocclusion and different growth patterns.

Authors:  Faruk Izzet Ucar; Tancan Uysal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Correlation between skeletal changes by maxillary protraction and upper airway dimensions.

Authors:  Ji-Won Lee; Ki-Ho Park; Seong-Hun Kim; Young-Guk Park; Su-Jung Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Mehmet Bayram; Ahmet E Sekerci; Suleyman K Buyuk; Ebubekir Toy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  3 in total

1.  Relationship between craniofacial and dental arch morphology with pharyngeal airway space in adolescents.

Authors:  Izabel de Oliveira; Raysa Pinheiro; Benedito Freitas; Peter Reher; Vandilson Rodrigues
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Three-dimensional evaluation of pharyngeal airway and maxillary arch in mouth and nasal breathing children with skeletal Class I and II.

Authors:  Janvier Habumugisha; Shu-Yu Ma; Amin S Mohamed; Bo Cheng; Min-Yue Zhao; Wen-Qing Bu; Yu-Cheng Guo; Rui Zou; Fei Wang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Assessment of pharyngeal airway in Korean adolescents according to skeletal pattern, sex, and cervical vertebral maturation: A cross-sectional CBCT study.

Authors:  Tassneem Elagib; Hee-Moon Kyung; Bui Quang Hung; Mihee Hong
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 1.361

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.