| Literature DB >> 30229488 |
Francesca Audino1, Leandro Oscar Conte2, Agustina Violeta Schenone2, Montserrat Pérez-Moya1, Moisès Graells1, Orlando Mario Alfano3.
Abstract
A kinetic model describing Fenton and photo-Fenton degradation of paracetamol (PCT) and consumption of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was proposed. A set of Fenton and photo-Fenton experiments (18 runs in total) was performed by fixing the initial concentration of PCT to 40 mg L-1 and varying the initial concentrations of H2O2 and ferrous ion, Fe2+. The experimental set-up was a well-stirred annular photoreactor equipped with an actinic BL TL-DK 36 W/10 1SL lamp. Experimental results highlighted that PCT is no more detected by HPLC analysis within a minimum reaction time of 2.5 and a maximum reaction time of 15.0 min. Besides, a maximum conversion of total organic carbon (TOC) of 68.5% was observed after 75 min of reaction in case of using UV radiation and the highest concentrations of the Fenton reagents. The experimental data were used to fit the kinetic model. The radiation field inside the reactor was taken into account through the local volumetric rate of photon absorption, evaluated by assuming a line source model with spherical and isotropic emission. The kinetic parameters were estimated by using a non-linear least-squares regression procedure and root mean square errors (RMSE) were calculated in order to validate the feasibility of the proposed model. A good agreement between experimental and predicted data was observed and the lowest values of RMSE resulted in 5.84 and 9.59% for PCT and H2O2 normalized concentrations, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: AOPs; Annular photoreactor; Design of experiments; Kinetic modeling; LVRPA; Pharmaceuticals
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30229488 PMCID: PMC8298369 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3098-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Experimental errors of the measurement techniques
| Measurement equipment | Measured species | Error (mg L−1) |
|---|---|---|
| HPLC Agilent 1200 series with UV-DAD | PCT [0–40] mg L−1 | 0.15 |
| Shimadzu VCHS/CSN TOC analyzer | TC [0–50] mg L−1 | 0.23 |
| IC [0–10] mg L−1 | 0.04 | |
| Hitachi U-2001 UV-Vis spectrophotometer | H2O2 [0–150] mg L−1 | 1.43 |
Fig. 1Experimental set-up. a Schematic view. b Picture
Experimental device specifications
| Tank reactor | ||
| Total volume, L | 9 | |
| Annular reactor | ||
| Total volume, L | 6 | |
| Irradiated volume, L | 1.5 | |
| Annular irradiated height, mm | 130 | |
| Outer cylinder | Outer diameter, mm | 150 |
| Inner diameter, mm | 140 | |
| Inner cylinder | Outer diameter, mm | 70 |
| Inner diameter, mm | 63.6 | |
| Irradiation system | ||
| Actinic BL TL-DK 36 W/10 1SL | ||
| Diameter, mm | 28 | |
| Length, mm | 589.8 | |
Design of experiments
| Irradiation | R (−) H2O2:PCT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | 5 | 94.5 | No | 10.5 |
| E2 | 5 | 189 | No | 21 |
| E3 | 5 | 378 | No | 42 |
| E4 | 7.5 | 94.5 | No | 10.5 |
| E5 | 7.5 | 189 | No | 21 |
| E6 | 7.5 | 378 | No | 42 |
| E7 | 10 | 94.5 | No | 10.5 |
| E8 | 10 | 189 | No | 21 |
| E9 | 10 | 378 | No | 42 |
| E10 | 5 | 94.5 | Yes | 10.5 |
| E11 | 5 | 189 | Yes | 21 |
| E12 | 5 | 378 | Yes | 42 |
| E13 | 7.5 | 94.5 | Yes | 10.5 |
| E14 | 7.5 | 189 | Yes | 21 |
| E15 | 7.5 | 378 | Yes | 42 |
| E16 | 10 | 94.5 | Yes | 10.5 |
| E17 | 10 | 189 | Yes | 21 |
| E18 | 10 | 378 | Yes | 42 |
Reaction mechanism of Fenton and photo-Fenton PCT degradation
| ID | Reaction steps | Kinetic constants |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 |
Values of LVRPA averaged over the irradiated reactor volume, calculated for a specific set of iron concentration
| 0.0 | 0 |
| 2.5 | 3.5 × 10−10 |
| 5.0 | 7.1 × 10−10 |
| 7.5 | 9.5 × 10−10 |
| 10.0 | 1.18 × 10−9 |
Fig. 2Methodological framework followed to estimate the parameters of the proposed kinetic model
Fig. 3Normalized experimental concentrations of TOC, obtained under dark (□) and irradiated(■) conditions and considering the lowest and highest initial concentrations of Fe2+ and H2O2 and ): experiments E1 and E10 (a) and experiments E9 and E18 (b), respectively
Fig. 4Specific consumption of the oxidizing agent as a function of the experiments performed with = 5 and 10 mg L−1 and for the three different investigated values of (94.5, 189, 378 mg L−1) under nonirradiated (striped bar chart) and irradiated conditions (solid bar chart)
Estimated values of the kinetic parameters
| M−1 s−1 | M−1 s−1 | M−1 s−1 | M−1 s−1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 147.29 | 3.16 | 7.00 × 107 | 3.58 × 109 |
Fig. 5Experimental concentrations of paracetamol (○,●) and hydrogen peroxide (Δ,▲) and predicted (▬) and hydrogen peroxide (- -). Dark (○,Δ) and irradiated (●,▲) conditions. a Experiment E6 (= 7.5 mg L−1 and = 378 mg L−1), and b experiment E18 = 10 mg L−1 and = 378 mg L−1)
Root mean square errors (RMSE)
| Dark and irradiated conditions | Dark conditions | Irradiated conditions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT | 6.80% | 7.64% | 5.84% |
| H2O2 | 9.67% | 9.75% | 9.59% |