Literature DB >> 30229090

Experimental data on the adsorption of Reactive Red 198 from aqueous solution using Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Optimization by response surface methodology with central composite design.

Mohammad Hadi Dehghani1,2, Mina Pourshabanian1, Zoha Heidarinejad1,3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for Reactive Red 198 adsorption. The adsorbents were characterized by SEM and XRD. In this dataset, the influence of Reactive Red 198 dye concentration, solution pH, adsorbent dosage, and contact time on Reactive Red 198 dye adsorption by Fe3O4 nanoparticles was tested by central composite design (CCD) under response surface methodology (RSM). The Fe3O4 nanoparticles adsorbent was prepared by chemical co-precipitation. The process efficiency was achieved in optimal conditions including pH=7, adsorbent dosage equal to 0.5 g/L, initial dye concentration of 100 mg/L, contact time equal to 30 min, 88%. Overall, the data offer a facile adsorbent to remove Reactive Red 198 dye from aqueous solutions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorption; Composite design; Nanoparticles; Reactive Red 198

Year:  2018        PMID: 30229090      PMCID: PMC6141496          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Design experiments were carried out using Central Composite Design (CCD) and adsorption tests were done in batch mode. The parameters were evaluated using RSM. The concentrations of Reactive Red 198 in the samples were measured using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (HACH, USA, model DR6000) set at a wavelength 518 nm. The characteristics of the nanoparticles were analyzed using SEM (Tuscan Mira 3 LMU) and XRD (Philips X’Pert, Netherlands). Value of the data The dataset will be useful for the application of the produced Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the removal of Reactive Red 198 dye from water and wastewater. This data offers a simple and environmentally friendly method for preparation of adsorbent from Fe3O4 nanoparticles. This data article presents a user central composite design (CCD) combined with response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize Reactive Red 198 removal from aqueous solution using adsorption process.

Data

This dataset contains 3 Figures and 4 Tables. The XRD analysis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles is shown in Fig. 1. The SEM image of the prepared adsorbent is also illustrated in Fig. 2.
Fig. 1

The XRD images Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized used adsorbent in the RR198 adsorption.

Fig. 2

The SEM images Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized used adsorbent in the RR198 adsorption.

The XRD images Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized used adsorbent in the RR198 adsorption. The SEM images Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized used adsorbent in the RR198 adsorption. Structure and characteristics of a Reactive Red 198 (RR198) dye are seen in Table 1. The design matrix for the central composite designs (CCD) is listed in Table 2, Table 3.
Table 1

Structure and characteristics of RR198.

CAS number18221
Type of dyeAzo
Chemical FormulaC27H18ClN7Na4O15S5
Molecular weight (g mol-1)967.5
Maximum wavelength (λmax), nm518
Molecular Structure
Table 2

Design matrix for the central composite designs.

FactorsLowCentralHigh
pH357
Time (min)305070
Concentration of dye (mg/L)100150200
Adsorbent dosage (g/L)0.250.370.5
Table 3

Design matrix for the CCD.

RunpHTime (min)Concentration of dye (mg/L)Adsorbent dosage (g/L)Efficiency (%)
17702000.586
27702000.2576
37302000.2572
47301000.2578
57701000.581
67701000.2581
77301000.588
87302000.583
95501500.3777
105501500.3777
115501500.3777
129501500.3772
139501500.3772
143701000.576
153302000.568
163702000.571
173302000.2558
183701000.2566
193702000.2561
203301000.2563
213301000.573
225501500.3777
235501500.3777
245501500.3777
25550500.3782
265501500.6277
275901500.3777
285502500.3772
295501500.3767
305101500.3770
311501500.3752
321501500.3751
335501500.3777
345501500.3777
355501500.3777
Structure and characteristics of RR198. Design matrix for the central composite designs. Design matrix for the CCD. The data for Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for second order model in the removal of RR198 show in Table 4. Central composite design 3-D surface plots which showing the effect of various parameters on RR198 removal efficiency with the adsorbent of Fe3O4 nanoparticles are presented in Fig. 3.
Table 4

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for second order model in the removal of RR198.

Fixed Effects
TermErrorFp-value
SourcedfdfProb>F
Whole-plot26.0771.77<0.0001Significant
a-pH15.8377.060.0001
a^216.3466.490.0001
Subplot1214.4212.73<0.0001Significant
B-Dose adsorbate116.5896.20<0.0001
C-Dye Con116.5830.22<0.0001
D-Time116.589.770.0063
aB116.581.410.2515
aC116.581.410.2515
aD116.581.410.2515
BC116.582.110.1651
BD116.582.110.1651
CD116.582.110.1651
B^218.542.450.1541
C^218.540.930.3615
D^218.540.650.4423
Fig. 3

Central composite design 3-D surface plots showing effect of (a) pH and contact time, (b) pH and RR198 concentration, (c) pH and adsorbent dosage on Reactive Red 198 removal efficiency with the adsorbent.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for second order model in the removal of RR198. Central composite design 3-D surface plots showing effect of (a) pH and contact time, (b) pH and RR198 concentration, (c) pH and adsorbent dosage on Reactive Red 198 removal efficiency with the adsorbent.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Materials

Reactive Red 198 dye powder with a purity of 99.6%, sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, FeCl2.6H2O, FeCl3.4H2O, ammonium hydroxide and ammonia were purchased from Merck and Sigma Aldridge companies.

Preparation Fe3O4 nanoparticles

Magnetic nanoparticles were prepared by chemical co-precipitation method. In this method, 16 mmol of FeCl2·6H2O and mmol 8 of FeCl3·4H2O with a stoichiometric ratio of 1 to 2 of Fe2+ and Fe3+ were mixed and in 200 ml of deionized water dissolved. The solution was then completely agitated at ambient temperature using a magnetic stirrer. Under these conditions, 10 ml of 25% ammonia was slowly added to the resulting solution, followed by a black colored sediment at the bottom of the container was formed. This precipitate indicates the presence of magnetic iron nanoparticles. After 10 min, stirring continuously to remove ammonia from the reaction medium, the iron nanoparticles were collected at the end of the container by placing the magnet under the reaction vessel, then the supernatant was removed and the precipitate was washed three times with ionizing water [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Finally, the characteristics of magnetic nanoparticles were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD).

Design of experiments

The pH of the solutions was adjusted prior to the adsorption by using 0.1 M solutions of HCl and NaOH and measured using a pH meter (Sense Ion 378, Hack) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. In this study, Design Expert 7.0.1 software was used to determine the number of experiments, values, and range of variables. The effects of operational parameters including pH (3–7), contact time (30–70 min), RR198 initial concentration (100–200 mg/L) and adsorbent dosage (0.25–0.5 g/L) on the amount of RR198 adsorbed onto the Fe3O4 nanoparticles were assessed and optimized by central composite design (CCD) combined with response surface methodology (RSM) was used to identify the optimum conditions for maximum removal of Reactive Red 198 dye [11], [12], [13]. The data were analyzed by the statistical method (ANOVA). The removal efficiency, RE, (%) and equilibrium adsorption capacity, qe, (mg g−1) were calculated as follows [13]:where C, C and C are the initial, equilibrium and at time t of RR198 concentrations (mg/L), respectively. After statistical analysis, the proposed model was presented as a second order equation in terms of actual parameters by software. This mathematical equation shows the adsorption rate of Reactive Red 198 dye by the adsorption process as a function of the amount of different operating parameters:
Subject areaEnvironmental Chemistry
More specific subject areaAdsorption
Type of dataTable, image and figure
How data was acquired

Design experiments were carried out using Central Composite Design (CCD) and adsorption tests were done in batch mode. The parameters were evaluated using RSM.

The concentrations of Reactive Red 198 in the samples were measured using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (HACH, USA, model DR6000) set at a wavelength 518 nm.

The characteristics of the nanoparticles were analyzed using SEM (Tuscan Mira 3 LMU) and XRD (Philips X’Pert, Netherlands).

Data formatAnalyzed
Experimental factorsThe data of effects of main experimental parameters including contact time, initial dye concentration, adsorbent dosage and solution pH were acquired.
Experimental featuresThe objective of this research were to i) prepare Preparation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles using chemical co-precipitation and ii) to study the Reactive Red 198 adsorption onto the Fe3O4 nanoparticles. iii) Optimization of Reactive Red 198 adsorption onto Fe3O4 nanoparticles adsorbent using RSM
Data source locationTehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Data accessibilityData are available in the paper
  3 in total

1.  Photodegradation of Acid red 18 dye by BiOI/ZnO nanocomposite: A dataset.

Authors:  Sahand Jorfi; Mohammad Javad Barkhordari; Mehdi Ahmadi; Neemat Jaafarzadeh; Azar Moustofi; Bahman Ramavandi
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-11-24

2.  Data on the acid black 1 dye adsorbtion from aqueous solutions by low-cost adsorbent- Cerastoderma lamarcki shell collected from the northern coast of Caspian Sea.

Authors:  Hossein Najafi Saleh; Mohammad Hadi Dehghani; Ramin Nabizadeh; Amir Hossein Mahvi; Kamyar Yaghmaeian; Faraji Hossein; Mansour Ghaderpoori; Mahmood Yousefi; Aliakbar Mohammadi
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-02-07

3.  Abatement of azo dye from wastewater using bimetal-chitosan.

Authors:  Ghorban Asgari; Bahman Ramavandi; Sima Farjadfard
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-11-20
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Data on the bisphenol A adsorption from aqueous solutions on PAC and MgO~PAC crystals.

Authors:  Bahram Kamarehie; Syed Mehrdad Seifi Tizabi; Rouhollah Heydari; Ali Jafari; Mansour Ghaderpoori; Mohammad Amin Karami; Afshin Ghaderpoury
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-10-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.