| Literature DB >> 30229083 |
Kunle E Ogundipe1, Babatunde F Ogunbayo1, Adekunle M Ajao1, Uyoyoghene L Nee Agba Ogundipe2, Patience F Tunji-Olayeni2.
Abstract
The causes of occupational accidents have been classified into unsafe conditions and unsafe behaviour. Interestingly, numerous authors have contributed to the issues of safety practices in managing building production process with different views on factors causing construction accident and insensitiveness to safety practices, but there have been a little efforts to bring together major causes and factors militating against safety practices in unified manners. Therefore, all identified forty nine factors from literature review [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [9], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32] were brought together and grouped into five different categories. Descriptive statistics were performed on the data to rank these factors as affected workmen on construction sites. The results were presented in figures, text file and tables using Mean Score. The data presented in this study were enable construction managers to standardize project risks assessment and management.Entities:
Keywords: Cause of accidents; Construction projects; Factors militating safety practices; Safety practices
Year: 2018 PMID: 30229083 PMCID: PMC6141419 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Survey response rate.
Fig. 2Education background of the respondents.
Fig. 3Category of operation of the respondents.
Fig. 4Age of the respondents.
Fig. 5Respondents years of experience.
Fig. 6Professional׳s workmen ratio.
Fig. 7Workmen made belief factors militating safety practices.
Fig. 8Management structure factors militating safety practices.
Operatives shortage of technical skills as factors militating against safety practices.
| Variables | Mean Score | Ranking |
|---|---|---|
| Problem of adaptability of workers to safety practices as it was against their traditional practices | 3.89 | 1st |
| Inadequate of required experience of the Safety manager to manage workmen | 3.88 | 2nd |
| Wide gaps of workmen ratio between the supervisor and artisans | 3.86 | 3rd |
| Limited technical and financial resources to identify and control risks and operational hazards. | 3.83 | 4th |
| Lack of safety education and commitment from construction professionals | 3.73 | 5th |
| The use of migrant workers on construction sites. | 3.73 | 6th |
| Lack of training on key issues pertaining health and safety consciousness | 3.73 | 6th |
| Manual handling of heavy materials and component | 3.55 | 8th |
| Lack of proper documentation of accidents on site | 3.42 | 9th |
Factors related to safety law enforcement.
| Mean Score | Ranking | |
|---|---|---|
| Corruption due to improper enforcement of laws and regulations. | 4.14 | 1st |
| Low enforcement of construction labour safety law | 4.12 | 2nd |
| Absence of safety monitoring system on construction sites | 3.97 | 3rd |
| Inadequate safety by-laws and standards | 3.89 | 4th |
| Absence of company׳s safety regulations and policies. | 3.83 | 5th |
| Epileptic enforcement mechanism | 3.77 | 6th |
| Wide ratio between safety manager and workmen | 3.64 | 7th |
| Weak safety regulatory authority or non-existent | 3.50 | 8th |
| Weak statutory OSH regulations and provisions. | 3.48 | 9th |
| Limited legislation governing Health and Safety practices | 3.47 | 10th |
| Lack of attention for general conditions of workers | 3.32 | 11th |
| Inadequate support from professionals body for enforcement | 3.30 | 12th |
| Frequent omission of workmen from insurance policy | 2.91 | 13th |
Fig. 9Factors related to work environment.
| Subject area | Building and Civil Construction. |
| More specific subject area | Construction safety practices |
| Type of data | Tables, figures and text files |
| How data was acquired | 66 copies of structured questionnaire were retrieved out of 75 survey data administered and simple statistical methods were used for the comprehensive analyses. |
| Data format | Raw data obtained from field survey |
| Experimental factors | Random sampling of different professionals working on construction sites in the study area. The data gotten were analyzed using SPSS and Microsoft Excel by ranking its Mean Score (MS) and they are presented in tables, figures and text files. Data gotten from the survey were measured on five-point Likert scale 5=Strongly Agreed, 4=Slightly Agreed, 3= Agreed, 2=Disagree, 1=Strongly Disagreed |
| Experimental features | Data were obtained through structured questionnaire to elicit needful information from different professionals working on Construction sites in the study area. Secondary data were gotten from extensive review of articles, conference papers, working papers and thesis that were relevant to this research topic. |
| Data source location | Lagos State, Nigeria. |
| Data accessibility | The research data are available within the article. |