Literature DB >> 30229069

Impact of precursor concentration on biological synthesis of cobalt oxide nanoparticles.

Ajuy Sundar Vijayanandan1, Raj Mohan Balakrishnan1.   

Abstract

The data provided in the article is in association with the journal article "Synthesis of cobalt oxide nanoparticles using endophytic fungus Aspergillus nidulans". Characterization data (ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEGSEM)) of nanoparticles synthesized using different precursor concentrations (2 mM and 10 mM) have been presented in this article. Data obtained by t-test and F-test have been given for absorbance values exhibited by nanoparticles synthesized using different concentrations. Required figures and table have been depicted.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30229069      PMCID: PMC6141386          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table

Value of the data

Different precursor concentrations of precursor salt cobalt acetylacetonate (2 mM and 10 mM) were used to synthesize cobalt oxide nanoparticles. UV–vis spectra, particle size distribution from DLS and SEM images of nanoparticles synthesized by 2 mM and 10 mM precursor concentrations were compared. F-test and t-test were performed to check the statistical significance of the absorbance data of nanoparticles obtained using 2 mM and 10 mM precursor salt concentrations.

Data

The synthesis of nanoparticles is done using fungal inoculum of Aspergillus nidulans and precursor salt concentration (cobalt acetylacetonate at 2 mM and 10 mM concentrations). The UV–vis spectrum of synthesized cobalt oxide nanoparticles using 2 mM precursor concentration is given in Fig. 1. Fig. 2 illustrates UV–vis spectrum of nanoparticles synthesized through 10 mM precursor concentration. Fig. 3 represents particle size distribution of nanoparticles (obtained from 2 mM precursor concentration) obtained from DLS analysis. Particle size distribution of nanoparticles (obtained from 10 mM precursor concentration) has been displayed in Fig. 4. Fig. 5, Fig. 6 show SEM image of nanoparticles synthesized by 2 mM and 10 mM precursor concentration respectively. FEGSEM images of nanoparticles synthesized have been displayed in Fig. 7, Fig. 8. Absorbance data obtained at 2 mM and 10 mM precursor concentrations from experimental work were statistically analyzed by t-test and F-test using MaxStat Lite (MaxStat Software, Germany), to determine the effect of precursor concentration on absorbance and statistical significance of data was determined using p-value and F-statistic (Table 1).
Fig. 1

UV–vis spectra of nanoparticles synthesized using 2 mM precursor concentration.

Fig. 2

UV–vis spectrum of nanoparticles synthesized using 10 mM precursor concentration.

Fig. 3

Particle size distribution of nanoparticles from DLS analysis (2 mM precursor concentration).

Fig. 4

Particle size distribution of nanoparticles (10 mM precursor concentration).

Fig. 5

SEM image of nanoparticles (of 2 mM precursor concentration).

Fig. 6

SEM image of nanoparticles (of 10 mM precursor concentration).

Fig. 7

FEGSEM image of nanoparticles (of 2 mM precursor).

Fig. 8

FEGSEM image of nanoparticles (of 10 mM precursor).

Table 1

Statistical analysis: T-test and F-test.

ReplicateAbsorbance at 2mM salt conc.Absorbance at 10mM salt conc.
11.1931.711
21.1921.690
31.1721.689
UV–vis spectra of nanoparticles synthesized using 2 mM precursor concentration. UV–vis spectrum of nanoparticles synthesized using 10 mM precursor concentration. Particle size distribution of nanoparticles from DLS analysis (2 mM precursor concentration). Particle size distribution of nanoparticles (10 mM precursor concentration). SEM image of nanoparticles (of 2 mM precursor concentration). SEM image of nanoparticles (of 10 mM precursor concentration). FEGSEM image of nanoparticles (of 2 mM precursor). FEGSEM image of nanoparticles (of 10 mM precursor). Statistical analysis: T-test and F-test.

Experimental design, materials, and methods

Materials

Potato dextrose broth (PDB) and chloramphenicol (Himedia Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai), cobalt (II) acetylacetonate (Sigma Aldrich, Mumbai).

Synthesis

5 hoops of fungal inocula (Aspergillus nidulans) from the agar plate were taken and inoculated into a conical flask containing 100 mL of PDB medium. The flask was incubated in a rotary shaker at constant room temperature (30 ± 2 °C), 115 rpm for three days. The solution was filtered by Whatman paper No. 1 and biomass was rinsed three to four times with distilled water to remove the medium constituents. The washed biomass was transferred into 100 mL of 2 mM cobalt acetylacetonate solution and kept for stirring at the same condition mentioned above. After five days, the solution was filtered using Whatman paper No. 1 and supernatant was analyzed for the presence of nanoparticles [2], [3]. The precursor concentration was varied to 10 mM keeping the concentration of biomass, rpm and temperature same to study the effect of precursor concentration on the properties of nanoparticles.

Characterization

Cobalt oxide nanoparticles (synthesized using 2 mM and 10 mM precursor concentrations) were characterized by UV–vis spectroscopy and DLS analysis to determine maximum absorbance peak and particle size distribution respectively. The samples were morphologically analyzed using SEM and FEGSEM.

Statistical analysis

To determine the effect of precursor concentration on absorbance, absorbance data of nanoparticles collected using 2 mM and 10 mM precursor concentrations from experimental work were statistically analyzed by t-test and F-test using MaxStat Lite. The significance level (α) was taken as 0.05 and the statistical significance of difference between the means of absorbance was determined by comparing p-value with the value of significance, using null hypothesis. F-statistic was also estimated, which is the ratio of difference between sample means and difference within the samples.
Subject areaBionanotechnology
More specific subject areaNanoparticle synthesis
Type of dataFigures (spectroscopy, microscopy), table
How data was acquiredUV–vis spectroscopy (Shimadzu UV-1800, Labomed USA), DLS analysis (Horiba Scientific Nanopartica SZ-100, Japan), SEM (JEOL-JSM-6380-LA, Japan), FEGSEM (Field Emission Gun Nano Nova Scanning Electron Microscope 450, Thermofisher Scientific, USA), MaxStat Lite (MaxStat Software, Germany).
Data formatFiltered and analyzed.
Experimental factorsmaximum absorbance peak (UV–vis), particle size distribution(DLS), morphology of particles (SEM, FEGSEM).
Experimental featuresThe solution containing nanoparticles was scanned from 200nm to 900nm spectral lines at room temperature in UV–vis analysis, DLS analysis was done with a scattering angle of 90° and medium viscosity of 0.89MPa s at 25°C, supernatant is taken directly for SEM and FEGSEM analysis.
Data source locationDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Karnataka, Surathkal, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Data accessibilityData are with this article
Related research articleTitle: Biosynthesis of cobalt oxide nanoparticles using endophytic fungus Aspergillus nidulans[1]
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.032.
  1 in total

1.  Biosynthesis of cobalt oxide nanoparticles using endophytic fungus Aspergillus nidulans.

Authors:  Ajuy Sundar Vijayanandan; Raj Mohan Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 6.789

  1 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Green Synthesis of Selenium and Tellurium Nanoparticles: Current Trends, Biological Properties and Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Marjorie C Zambonino; Ernesto Mateo Quizhpe; Francisco E Jaramillo; Ashiqur Rahman; Nelson Santiago Vispo; Clayton Jeffryes; Si Amar Dahoumane
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.