| Literature DB >> 30229032 |
Mohammad Hadi Dehghani1,2, Maral Fanaei Mosavi3, Ali Asghar Ale-Sheikh3, Zoha Heidarinejad1,4, Mahmood Yousefi1.
Abstract
This study was conducted to correctly manage the system of storage, collection and transfer of wastes in district 22, Tehran. After reviewing existing methods, an optimal system was designed in the GIS environment and appropriate solutions were suggested. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used. After extracting result criteria, these criteria were provided to 15 experts and managers by means of a Delphi questionnaire. Screening of the criteria was done using the criterion importance graph; a necessary condition to apply criteria and sub-criteria, is having at least half the numerical value of each vertical and horizontal vector. The results of the study showed that the most important criterion associated with the selection of waste transfer station is "distance from residential houses" with a final weight of 0.341. "Suitable traffic conditions" and "lack of noise pollution" are the next important criteria with weights of 0.259 and 0.118, respectively. Finally, "non-destruction of recreational facilities" was chosen as the least important (weight of 0.03). Transfer in this district is also 100% mechanized. At the district level, there are 10 garbage trucks, of which 7 collect during night and 3 during day. Given per capita of the district, it takes about 10 min to collect each ton of waste. In general, in order to investigate and plan specific methods in the study district, using Geographic Information System, the location of reservoirs in residential and commercial districts has been determined and suggested with a coefficient of 0.75.Entities:
Keywords: Collection; GIS; Household waste; Storage; Transfer
Year: 2018 PMID: 30229032 PMCID: PMC6141366 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
The status of waste management in district 22 of Tehran municipality in different regions.
| Region | Number of vehicles | Number of reservoir | Number of municipal solid waste workers | Rate of waste generation (kg) | Per capita waste generation (g/person/day) | Labor per capita (per thousand) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 420 | 11 | 30,223 | 704 | 0.323 |
| 2 | 4 | 315 | 8 | 27,707 | 888 | 0.235 |
| 3 | 2 | 80 | 3 | 6927 | 888 | 0.088 |
| 4 | 6 | 570 | 12 | 34,026 | 727 | 0.352 |
| Total | 17 | 1385 | 34 | 98,883 | 802 | 1 |
Duration of waste collection in district 22 of Tehran municipality.
| Region | Pick up time (Hours) | Duration between Pick up time | Pick up time <total> (Hours) | Rate of waste generation (kg) | Average pick up timeper ton of waste (Hours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1:20:06 | 3:45:10 | 5:05:16 | 30,223 | 0:10:25 |
| 2 | 1:41:19 | 3:17:08 | 4:58:27 | 27,707 | 0:08:59 |
| 3 | 1:09:06 | 1:58:27 | 3:07:33 | 6927 | 0:09:25 |
| 4 | 1:13:24 | 3:51:15 | 5:09:09 | 34,026 | 0:12:06 |
| Total | 5:38:20 | 12:52:00 | 18:12:55 | 98,883 | 00:10:023 |
Fig. 1Optimal location of waste reservoirs in region 1.
Fig. 2Optimal location of waste reservoirs in region 2.
Fig. 3Optimal location of waste reservoirs in region 3.
Fig. 4Optimal location of waste reservoirs in region 4.
Fig. 6Traffic routes of waste trucks in region 2.
Fig. 7Traffic routes of waste trucks in region 3.
Fig. 8Traffic routes of waste trucks in region 4.
Fig. 9Classifying information layers (criteria and sub-criteria).
Relative weight and inconsistency rate of the sub-criteria.
| Sub-criteria | Relative weight | Inconsistency rate |
|---|---|---|
| Distance from residential houses | 0.215 | 0.03 |
| Traffic status | 0.189 | 0.04 |
| Noise pollution | 0.144 | 0.05 |
| Pollution and unpleasant smell | 0.127 | 0.04 |
| Wind dominant direction | 0.105 | 0.05 |
| Soil pollution | 0.096 | 0.2 |
| Future enough space | 0.089 | 0.04 |
| Destruction of recreational sites | 0.035 | 0.08 |
| Summary | 1 | 0.35 |
Final weight of the optimal selection options for the urban waste transfer station.
| Options/criteria | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | 0.334 | 0.332 | 0.31 | 0.388 | 0.341 |
| F | 0.265 | 0.254 | 0.281 | 0.237 | 0.259 |
| E | 0.104 | 0.108 | 0.136 | 0.126 | 0.118 |
| B | 0.097 | 0.077 | 0.103 | 0.093 | 0.093 |
| C | 0.078 | 0.064 | 0.062 | 0.057 | 0.065 |
| A | 0.059 | 0.059 | 0.048 | 0.041 | 0.052 |
| H | 0.032 | 0.057 | 0.039 | 0.039 | 0.042 |
| G | 0.031 | 0.049 | 0.021 | 0.019 | 0.03 |
Fig. 10Prioritization of optimal locating options for the urban waste transfer station.
Fig. 11Prioritization of optimal locating criteria for the urban waste transfer station.
Fig. 5Traffic routes of waste trucks in region 1.
| Subject area | Environmental Health |
|---|---|
| More specific subject area | Waste Management |
| Type of data | Table, Figures |
| Data format | Raw, Analyzed |
| Experimental factors | Check the status of waste management district 22, Tehran The optimal storage system for collecting and transporting waste was designed with GIS software. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used to provide a solution. |
| Experimental features | The purpose of this study was to: 1) Design the transport routes and storage system; 2) Provide suitable solutions for improving municipal waste management. |
| Data source location | Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. |
| Data accessibility | The data are available with this article |