| Literature DB >> 30229006 |
Monireh Majlesi1, Nad Ali Alavi1, Ali Akbar Mohammadi2, Sima Valipor1.
Abstract
This report investigates to analyse the production of waste in dental offices of Qaem Shahr city. In this study, from 120 dental offices in Qaem Shahr city, 21 offices were selected through random sampling. Sampling taken from 3 offices in 3 consecutive working days (on Sundays, Mondays and Tuesdays). The components were classified into three groups based on their specificity and potential. Total annual waste produced in Dentist Offices in Qaem Shahr city is 557.80 kg. In dental office, the amount of biohazard, chemical and pharmaceutical and domestic type wastes were 64.10, 2.70 and 33.20 respectively. Production percentages of biohazard, the highest weighted mean for potentially biohazard (155.25±0.63 g) and the lowest for chemical and pharmaceutical (6.35±1.85 g).Entities:
Keywords: Biohazard waste; Chemical and pharmaceutical waste; Dental waste; Domestic type waste; Qaem shahr
Year: 2018 PMID: 30229006 PMCID: PMC6140284 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Average of solid waste production in dental clinics in Qaem-Shahr city. Components of dental solid waste in dental clinics.
| Type of waste | Yearly production (kg/year) | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic-like wastes | 185.2 | 33.2 |
| Biohazard wastes | 357.52 | 64.1 |
| Chemical and pharmaceutical | 15.08 | 2.7 |
| Total | 557.8 | 100 |
Average of infection solid waste production in dental clinics in Qaem-Shahr city.
| Saliva-contaminated tissues (infectious) | 41.98 | 11.74 | 17.39 |
| Saliva contaminated gauzes | 19.15 | 5.36 | 27.22 |
| Saliva-contaminated cotton | 13.92 | 3.89 | 35.01 |
| Blood-contaminated cotton rolls (infectious) | 22.3 | 6.24 | 41.25 |
| Saliva-contaminated cotton rolls (infectious) | 14.76 | 4.13 | 45.38 |
| Nylon gloves | 21.52 | 6.02 | 51.4 |
| Latex gloves | 15.93 | 4.45 | 55.85 |
| Suction tips | 20.5 | 5.73 | 61.58 |
| Needles, sharp objects and cutting blades (infectious) | 16.01 | 4.48 | 66.06 |
| Extracted teeth (infectious) | 15.29 | 4.27 | 70.33 |
| Dental mirror | 15.32 | 4.29 | 74.62 |
| Yarn Suture | 5.22 | 1.46 | 76.08 |
| Surgical blade | 15.61 | 4.37 | 80.45 |
| Suture needle | 17.65 | 4.94 | 85.39 |
| Wooden sticks (infectious) | 16.1 | 4.5 | 89.89 |
| Mouth thread | 16.15 | 4.52 | 94.41 |
| Serum chamber | 19.98 | 5.59 | 100 |
| Total (kg) | 357.52 | 100 |
Per capita waste for each patient in different parts of dentistry offices in Gaem-Shahr city.
| Per capita waste per patient | Amount (g/day) |
|---|---|
| Biohazard wastes | 155.25 |
| Domestic-like wastes | 80.6 |
| Chemical and pharmaceutical | 6.35 |
| Total amount | 242.2 |
Management of solid wastes generated by dental offices.
| Management method | Percent of clinics |
|---|---|
| Waste reduction programs | 52.38 |
| Solid waste separation programs | 71.42 |
| Waste recycling programs | 66.66 |
| Method of sterilization | 71.4 |
| Management of amalgam residues and chips | 81 |
| Management of sharp objects and cutting blades | 100 |
| Safety of sharp objects and cutting blades | 0 |
| Weighing and recording the amount of waste produced | 33.3 |
Fig. 1Map of study.
| Subject area | Dental office in Qaem Shahr in Mazandaran Province |
| More specific subject area | Describe narrower subject area |
| Type of data | Tables and figure |
| How data was acquired | In this study, total amount of daily dental wastes from all parts of studied clinics were collected according to WHO guidelines, Basel convention provisions and Iranian national regulations |
| Data format | Raw, Analyzed |
| Experimental factors | The mentioned parameters above, in abstract section, were analyzed according to the production rates of different components of generated dental wastes and completed questionnaires. Sampling was carried out at 3 offices in 3 consecutive working days (on Sundays, Mondays and Tuesdays). Samples were manually separated and weighed to 46 parts. The components were classified into three groups based on their specificity and potential. The data were analyzed using Excel software and the share of each component and each category of three categories of waste was determined. A checklist containing 8 questions was used to evaluate the management of dental wastes. |
| Experimental features | The composition and production rate of dental solid waste and associated management practices were determined. |
| Data source location | Qaem Shahr, Mazandaran province, Iran. |
| Data accessibility | The data are available whit this article |