| Literature DB >> 30228815 |
Shanglei Ning1, Siquan Ma2, Abdul Qahar Saleh1, Lingyu Guo1, Zixiao Zhao1, Yuxin Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30228815 PMCID: PMC6136477 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4369253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6121 Impact factor: 2.260
Relationship between SHMT2 expression and conventional clinicopathological parameters in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
| Clinicopathological parameters |
| SHMT2 expression |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | |||
| Gender | 0.959 | |||
| Female | 31 | 15 | 16 | |
| Male | 69 | 33 | 36 | |
| Age (years) | 0.987 | |||
| <60 | 52 | 25 | 27 | |
| ≥60 | 48 | 23 | 25 | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.935 | |||
| ≤5 | 40 | 19 | 21 | |
| >5 | 60 | 29 | 31 | |
| Tumor number | 0.351 | |||
| Solitary | 91 | 45 | 46 | |
| Multiple | 9 | 3 | 6 | |
| Vascular invasion | 0.120 | |||
| No | 64 | 27 | 37 | |
| Yes | 36 | 21 | 15 | |
| Pathological grade | 0.361 | |||
| I | 4 | 3 | 1 | |
| II | 62 | 27 | 35 | |
| III | 34 | 18 | 16 | |
| T stage | 0.017∗ | |||
| T1 | 42 | 26 | 16 | |
| T2 | 47 | 20 | 27 | |
| T3–T4 | 11 | 2 | 9 | |
| N stage | 0.318 | |||
| N0 | 86 | 43 | 43 | |
| N1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | |
| Metastasis | 0.261 | |||
| No | 96 | 45 | 51 | |
| Yes | 4 | 3 | 1 | |
| TNM stage | 0.041∗ | |||
| I | 34 | 22 | 12 | |
| II | 42 | 18 | 24 | |
| III–IV | 24 | 8 | 16 | |
Figure 1(a) SHMT2 expression is higher in tumor than in paired nontumor tissue. IHC score results demonstrated that high SHMT2 expression was observed in 52 of the 100 tumor specimens while only 15 of the paired nontumor tissue showed SHMT2 high expression. (b) SHMT2 expression patterns in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. A: negative staining (−), B: weakly positive staining (+), C: positive staining (++), and D: strongly positive staining (+++). Round photographs represent TMA cores, and quadrate photographs represent specific areas from TMA cores at magnification 200x. (c) SHMT2 protein level is significantly higher in representative tumor tissue than in paired nontumor tissue. Representative Western blot images from three independent experiments are shown. T means tumor and N means paired nontumor.
Figure 2Overall survival curves of patients for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with different SHMT2 expression levels. Patients with low expression of SHMT2 have a significantly better survival rate than those with high SHMT2 expression (P = 0.030).
Univariate analysis of clinicopathological features for overall survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
| Characteristics ( | Number | Survival rate (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.064 | ||
| Female | 31 | 32.3 | |
| Male | 69 | 34.8 | |
| Age (years) | 0.325 | ||
| <60 | 52 | 38.5 | |
| ≥60 | 48 | 29.2 | |
| SHMT2 expression | 0.030∗ | ||
| Low | 48 | 45.8 | |
| High | 52 | 23.1 | |
| Vascular invasion | 0.470 | ||
| No | 64 | 31.3 | |
| Yes | 36 | 38.9 | |
| Tumor number | 0.012∗ | ||
| Solitary | 91 | 35.2 | |
| Multiple | 9 | 22.2 | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.484 | ||
| ≤5 | 40 | 32.5 | |
| >5 | 60 | 35.0 | |
| Pathological grade | 0.800 | ||
| I | 4 | 50 | |
| II | 62 | 33.9 | |
| III | 34 | 32.4 | |
| T stage | <0.001∗ | ||
| T1 | 42 | 40.5 | |
| T2 | 47 | 34.0 | |
| T3–T4 | 11 | 9.0 | |
| N stage | 0.888 | ||
| N0 | 86 | 33.7 | |
| N1 | 14 | 35.7 | |
| Metastasis | 0.073 | ||
| No | 96 | 35.4 | |
| Yes | 4 | 0 | |
| TNM stage | 0.058 | ||
| I | 34 | 38.2 | |
| II | 42 | 35.7 | |
| III–IV | 24 | 25.0 |
Multivariate analysis (Cox regression) of clinicopathological characteristics of 100 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
| Variable | Category |
| HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHMT2 expression | Low | |||
| High | 0.021 | 2.746 | 1.168–6.453 | |
| Tumor number | Solitary | |||
| Multiple | 0.114 | 1.937 | 0.854–4.394 | |
| T stage | T1 | 0.001 | 0.258 | 0.115–0.579 |
| T2 | ||||
| T3 T4 |
Abbreviations: HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval.